>>43643558
no

>>43643558
yes, so is being poor, ugly, disabled and so on

>>43643581
Wouldn't have happen if you had maintained good karma in the previous life-cycle.

There is a specific look to someone who is morally repugnant, and it's outside of just being attractive or unattractive.

>>43643558
i try my best to be kind and genuinely caring and understanding in all interactions, but i also unfortunately have very large bones and height

>>43643676
It's okay baby girl

>>43643558
It's not immoral to be ugly but it is immoral to insist that your ugliness has to be regarded as beauty

>>43643661
It's kind of like when you keep making evil decisions in fable or one of those old republic star wars rpgs. I don't know what it is but when I let go of shame, projection and hate and worked to be a kinder gentler person it's like this aura of ugliness left my face

>>43643558
I don't think so
but then again I became less kind and more judgemental, now I am uglier and mannish

>>43643558
Probably not!

>>43643581
im so sorry im sorry i failed

>>43643558
Would you feel better about being a hon if it wasn't

>>43643928
yea

>>43643558
no but assuming hons are rapey is a good rule of thumb and is right more than wrong

>>43643558
actually this is a cis woman depicted so its kind of misogynistic for you to say shes a hon

>>43643558
it's a personal failing due to not transitioning early or being working hard enough to be rich enough to pass via surgery

>>43643947
Wouldn't it be better to be an evil passoid than a morally righteous hon

>>43643558
nope. being a passoid is.