Ummm, optics check, LGB sisters?
>2019looks like you're the only person who cared
>>44963042Stop. No one cares about optics. LGB people have been accepted as people, which means a bad LGB person is now just a bad person.They aren't all treated as representatives of the entire community anymore.
>>44963296When has that ever mattered?>>44963351Ummm.. no.
>>44963376Ummm, yes.
>>44963514Do you have any idea how FUCKED you are?
>>44963564According to that chart? Not fucked at all.A small drop in acceptance does not mean the trend will keep going in that direction. 10 percentage points isn't even much of a setback.
>>44963042i thought the one on the right was the 9 year old son at first
>>44963801Faggot cope.
>>44963831Literally both controversial and extreme based on the previous graph you presented, but sure.
>>4496390535% of the country thinks you should be arresting for fucking, much less ""marrying"". You think 35% of the population is controversial and extreme?
>>44963943yep
>>44963988LOLYou are FUCKED. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/19/opinion/heated-rivalry-gay-prejudice.html?eafs_enabled=false
>>44964039Notice that it's still more acceptable than back in 2014-15, and those were good years.Pundit articles arn't going to get you far.
>>44963376nigga, even someone like Peter Thiel can get by while being gay and he's the antichrist
>>44964572>what is trajectory>what is velocityFucked.
>>44964807Imagine if the only way you could analyze social behavior is Newtonian physics word vomitLife must be hard being a pseud
>>44964807> What are complex social patterns> What is "human societies aren't Newtonian physics"> What is sociologyCome on, you know as well as anyone else that society doesn't work that way. Don't play dumb.
I discriminate against homofaggots IRL at every chance I get
>>44963564I want to know how the fuck 15% of the population between 2019 and 2020 was convinced that cheating on your partner is okay actually.
>>44967883Could be a few things (or a combination of them)* Sample error: it's possible the sample was randomly not representative of the general population. Alternatively, it could just be that the sampling was off for a non-random reason.* People who have been mostly monogamous don't have a good framework for differentiating an extramarital afair (cheating), swinging, open relationships, polyamory, and even premarital sex. It's possible people didn't know which one they were being asked about.* The rise of shows like "sister wives," followed by a rapid on-screen collapse of the sister-wives' family, may account for the graph if people misunderstood the question.* I have not looked into this, but were the question phrasings changed at all?There could also be other factors; that's all I got.
>>44963943>You think 35% of the population is controversial and extreme?if we're talking about America then yesAmericans are dysgenic cattle subhumans incapable of rational thought
