There is nothing to be gained from this mans work nowadays. Its read for sentiment and fantasy or knowledge of the history of philosophy, but you will not gain any sort of insight
A pseud beloved by pseuds.>Kant PROVED that the WHOLE WORLD is in our BRAINSlol, lmao even
i liked his books. thought they were interesting
>>24681193I think you meant to post a picture of Descartes.You read the classics to get the basics, then when you want to get anything more modern, Schopenhauer is the first philospher you'll read where you won't immediately be hit with ideas that have been so throroughly debunked since that you're able to instantly see the gaping flaws in the logic. And unlike nietzsche, you can actually understand what he's saying without commentaries.
>>24681193he got nice hairn though
>>24681213If you need commentaries to read an author you’re not ready.
>>24681193Uncomfortable, that fact of the legitimacy of the AN arguments. Uncomfortable that the necessity of the end of the human race is the conclusion that one comes to at the end of an honest pursuit human knowledge.
>>24681193Nothing good to be gained indeed, assuming that avoiding perdition isn't good in itself.
What about if I just find him to be comfy reading? His accessibility is what makes him so great for teenagers getting into philosophy. You don't actually need to read Kant first to understand him, even though he says you do.
>>24681213This>>24681202You sound upset
