>this isn't a list of best or favorite books, but a list of books they most wish others thought they had readHow do we respond?
>>24682693>man I sure do wish people thought I read Lord of the Rings
>>24682693its really just the top 100 influential books
>>24682693I agree that this is not a favourite top or a best top, this is a popularity top since the places are decided by popularity of votes. On the other hand, voting polls are anonymous. Noboody except the person creating the image has access to the votes. >but they pretend anyways to be perceived as intellectuals! Believe me, there is no /lit/ user that loves /lit/ at that level to put books they didn't like in a popularity top. /lit/ is simply a place where classics are appreciated. This top are the most basic classics ever.
>>24683401>Noboody except the person creating the image has access to the votes.It's literally linked in the upper left corner
>>24683327>no Céline nor ProustInfluential for an online English speaker
>>24683429Both of them are featured in that list.
>>24682693is this the book chart thread?
>>24683444moar 2
>>24683447moar 3
>>24683444>>24683447>>24683449No it isn’t, fuck off to pol
>>24683449moar 4
>>24683453moar 5>>24683452go kys whiney faggot kek
>>24683456moar 6
>>24683460moar 7
>>24683461moar 8
>>24683462moar 9..INFO BLOB MEGA PACKhttp://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13gNcyzC7QvfTbXcVSqorj1pZmFb-csP6google drive easy to use interface
>>24683422I clearly meant specific per person votes. The votes you see are the same as the top. You don't see each person's 6 or 7 books and even if you somehow did it would still be anonymous.
>>24683513>I clearly meant specific per person votes.It's literally the link in the top left
>>24682693its true. Every year you guys make a list of books most anons haven't read and that are rarely discussed here....... to impress upon places like /r/books (where it will inevitably get posted) that /lit/ is some kind of rarefied literary salon.Its pathetic. might aswell post your Amazon wish-list of books you mean to read or feel you ought to have read at some point
>>24682693Most of these aren't difficult reads, and a good chunk are easy read + not boring. It's not that they're particularly great, just top of the iceberg good books. You have to remember these charts are median responses, alot of people have read and liked them that's all
>>24683536>and even if you somehow did it would still be anonymous.I couldn't even find my vote in that excel. Good luck being recognized by it in any way.
>>24682693I respond by reading them all.
>>24683540>that are rarely discussed hereWhat books are even discussed here?
>>24683444I hecking love charts dawg
>>24682693You don't understand what community/society is. Not meaning to defend community/society, they have their strengths but are not the end all of be all. The individual will always exist.
