[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1756541466968284.jpg (67 KB, 1024x1024)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>had had
English is so ugly bros
>>
>I do do that
heh
doo-doo
>>
>>24683852
Just use different words bozo
>>
When do you HAVE to say that though
>I had eaten
>I had received
>I had owned
>I had gotten
>>
>>24684125
Just replace "had" with "once"
>>
>>24683852
>He had had
>He'd had
Contractions to the rescue
>>
>>24684130
Doesn't solve anything, dumby.
>>
>>24684128
that's even worse
>>24684125
I'd raped before
>>
meanwhile in russian
>cock ya
>cock tack
lol
>>
>>24683852
You are blaming English, the real issues is retards who don't know how to effectively use constructions like "had had."
>>
>he used to have
How did the past participle of"use" mean 'once'?
>>
James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.
>>
>>24684131
>t. esltard
>>
File: 1748852897621286.jpg (101 KB, 823x900)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>24683852
It does make sense THOUGH. The problem is the past tense and the participle of "have" are the same.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.