eternal reminder
Gedanken ohne Inhalt sind leer, Anschauungen ohne Begriffe sind blind.
>>24685095I approve this message.
Sorry, I don't read books written by anyone whose place of origin wasn't part of Rome.
>>24685121Then you are lost.
>>24685095This pseud spamming will continue regardless
Honestly love it to death. I don't believe anyone is prefactored or pre manufactured with anything other than prejudice though. Hard to suggest another narrative than god
>>24685080We already have a Kant thread >>24683233
>>24686346This is the B version, make sure you read both
What’s the point of reading philosophy?like I get the Greeks and Romans as well as religious philosophy but the renaissance-modern world philosophy seems pointless
>>24686386Renaissance is moreso for aesthetics value. Greeks have good philosophical foundations, hence the rebirth and if you don't take the enlightenment into consideration then the modern world would be pointless. It's the industrial revolution baby
>>24685121but aren't the Germans in the tradition of Rome which was in the tradition of the Greeks?
>>24686393Right but how can stuff like Kant or Hegel help me understand the esoteric warfare the elites are raining down upon us. I know it won’t help me make money
>>24686409Nothing ?
>>24686409literally enlightens you
>>24686744On what? Nobody on /lit/ seems to have transcended or becomes enlightened… that just argue about whether Hegel or Kant is better
>>24686767They*
>we need a concept of a god to understand moral obligations and justice kek'dso enlightening
>>24686858nope. filtered.
>>24686767How would you know what enlightenment looks like?
>>24686945>Kant argues that a god is necessary as a postulate of practical reason to make the fulfillment of the moral law comprehensible and the ultimate aim of morality achievableWoah the enlightenment....is entering me
>>24686970not the same as moral obligations midwit. admittedly filtered. try actually reading it.
>>24686977based on>>Kant argues that a god is necessary as a postulate of practical reason to make the fulfillment of the moral law comprehensible and the ultimate aim of morality achievableI'll pass, peak midwit pseud shit.
>>24686980mental midget copefulfillment of moral law =/= moral obligationyour puny brain is too weak. it has not been pumped up by the gaunlet of transcendental critique. go cry about it girly man.
>>24686386It’s fun
>>24687014NTA I’m the anon asking what the fuck is the point of knowing this? How to it apply to anything exist arguing with other philosophers? It doesn’t seem to have any use in government or living
>>24687202Except *
>>24687202You to know what is true and right first to live according to what's true and right. If you don't know the laws, you will break them and suffer accordingly. Only knowledge is salvation.
>>24687241*You have to know what is true and right...
>>24687202Since you mentioned government, I can assure you with near certainty that a government made up of people who read Critique for reasons such as their own interest, curiosity, amusement, or the challenge of doing so, would be immensely better to live with than a government who’s body is made up of those whose interest in things are as much as there is a tangible and material benefit to be gained from them.
>>24687395Why would it be better than just reading “the republic?”
>>24685080>Human reason has the peculiar fate in one species of its cognitions that>it is burdened with questions which it cannot dismiss, since they are>given to it as problemsb by the nature of reason itself, but which it also>cannot answer, since they transcend every capacity" of human reason.And dropped. I can't understand what my philosopher is saying.
The best thing about Kant is he is only the beginning....
>>24685080what's critique's about please?
>>24688837what can the mind know through pure thinking? and know it for sure. and the the implications snd consequences of the results of that investigation.
>>24688852I see, thank you very much. is it easy to read or not?
>>24688926not easy to read at all as many will likely confirm. if you finish the book you will have turbocharged attention span.
>>24688931damn it, I wanted to read it. and did kant found the answer to >>24688852 ?
>>24688980yes
>>24688459TL;DR: Kant: "I have therefore found it necessary to deny reason in order to make room for faith."
>>24688437Significantly deeper level of reasoning and self awareness.
>>24688459ngl it's crazy that this is the part that filtered you
>>24688993Esoteric Kant: I have therefore found it necessary to overaffirm reason and underdeny faith to make room for pure fucking magic
>>24689427uh...explain?
