Even they are waking up for the fact that women only read porn.
She is the anti-Leonie
>women
I skip sex scenes in books and TV shows. They add basically nothing to the story. I'm not some puritan - I watch TONS of porn. I'm just bored by reading about or watching people pretend to have sex. It's not interesting or sexy, it's just boring
>>24689120She argues that you watching porn is the same thing as women reading porn. She explicitly says the female brain is wired to respond better to written porn because they crave empathy and the storytelling which men don't. In hindsight this would explain a lot of the bad decisions women make and causes they support.
>>24689134The difference is that i can cum in 60 seconds and get back with my day - i dont spend a few hours a day watching porn
>>24689303Peterson nailed this part. A low status woman meets a high status man who falls madly in love and cares only for her. Women cum buckets for that. They don't talk about babies. But this is a jackpot reproduction wise for women.
>>24689134>because they crave empathy>"I'm not like them; I have feelings!"I believe that they think men don't require empathy but it's laughable.I know it's a cringe example (not any more cringe than werewolves tbf) but there are two reasons why step fantasy got so popular, neither of which are physical or visual:1. The taboo, obviously (social)2. It's one of the only types of porn where the actors show more emotion than if they were assembling an IKEA set (emotional)GFE is also ridiculously popular and frequently has no sexual content at all.>>24689340>But this is a jackpot reproduction wise for women.It has about as much to do with reproduction as gooning to anime characters.
The spergy 20-minute rant on how getting wet from non-consensual fairy fingering does not mean you enjoy it was clearly personal.
>>24689416After 30 years of being attracted to women, I am starting to reconsider my decision.
>>24689395I mean in the novels. It's all about hijacking your reproductive drive. For men it's super cutie youthfull sex nymphs. For women it's rich handsome loner Chad's who love them above all else. There is no better mate to reproduce with from a woman's standpoint.Just like an average guys isn't going to have a uber attractive cutie fall on his lap. The average woman isn't going to have Elon Musk fly them to his space mansion and make love to them. Not for lack of trying on his part.
>>24689442How about poor mid loner chuds? Anyone?
>How could this have happened?
>>24689134I watched the video and I can tell you that her point was woefully puritanical. Notice she can't even pronounce the word "porn" verbally, which is strange. The main problem of the video was saying that modern literature is too lewd, rash and inappropriate and women are evil for doing that. You can easily translate this to men watching anime, videogames with tons of fanservice and bouncing boobs.Many women in the comment section started to say her point of view came as prudish and downright hysterical. Especially because censorship in 2025 is increasing all over the Internet.If anything, literature and entertainment feels so soulless today because is much less transgressive than to say, literature in the 90s or the 80s. You could read all type of shit there and genuinely disturbing things that challenged standard views. You had pulp filled with ultra violence and sex scenes and for women you have all sort of vampire or witch literature dipping in occult stuff, tons of social critique, etc. By asking that women literature to be more prudish and even more sanitized is basically asking to kill literature for good (and eventually killing things like anime or anything actually fun for that matter).
>>24689051I would take this woman more seriously if her writing wasn't so aggresively mediocre.
>>24689637Are you retarded? She doesn't say porn because the algorithm punishes your reach for it. She says as much at the start.>By asking that women literature to be more prudish and even more sanitized???The new york best seller list has literal minotaur bestiality on it. What more do you fucking want. I like writing erotica desu (I've never published it other than showing it to ex gfs) but it should absolutely not be normal or publicly available. Making you coom != good for everyone.
>>24689637I watched it over a week ago so I might be remembering wrong, but I thought she mentioned at one point that she can't say the word "porn" because YouTube's automated censorship system will flag her video as adult content if she does. Her main argument is the familiar one that your brain's long-term reaction to continuous porn consumption works like drug resistance and you will inevitably need increasingly depraved content to feel the same thrill. There might be some truth to that but afaik there isn't enough research to say for sure.The real problem is something else. Women have been reading smut forever, but it used to be quarantined to the smut ghetto in one corner of the bookstore with cover art of hunky men tearing women's clothes off, so you could recognize it for what it is a mile away and nobody pretended it was anything else. Some women got addicted to them, some women read them in moderation, overall it wasn't a big deal. Now this type of book has subdued cover art that doesn't convey much information and stores stock it in the fantasy and sci-fi section mixed in with normal books, and women pretend like it's ordinary genre fiction when they review it on social media. Nobody would have much of an issue with these books or even be aware of them if there wasn't this large scale gaslighting to pretend they're something other than porn. It's like if every third movie coming out of Hollywood was just explicit porn with low production value and porn stars instead of real actors and everyone in Hollywood pretended they were normal movies. Is the issue the porn itself or is it the way it's being mixed in with more mainstream content?
>>24689051I like her aesthetic is she single
i'm a man and i thought Twilight was good
>>24689822How bad can it b->Blue Prince>On royalslop Its xianxia slop isn't it?
>>24689134>She argues that you watching porn is the same thing as women reading pornit obviously is, you will just never see any man pretend porn is high art and that they cultured for engaging with it
>>24689637>If anything, literature and entertainment feels so soulless today because is much less transgressive than to say, literature in the 90s or the 80s.When everything became permissible, there was nothing left to be edgy/transgressive. You NEED a conservative mainstream culture to get cool countercultures.
>>24689892Wasn't that the point of Playboy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8ATT6Ffd88How to find a qt fat hairy Jewess who reads and didn't go to college to marry and live happily with ever after, /lit/?
>>24689442>The average woman isn't going to have Elon Musk fly them to his space mansion and make love to them.Didn't he literally already do this to 20+ average and below average women?
>>24689999Well he's giving it an honest go, he's only human after all. For now.
>>24689999If you were the richest man on earth wouldn't you knock up as many women as possible like Genghis Khan?
>>24689637Smut, porn, and fanservice are not transgressive. They are inferior products for inferior people, and the fact that they are so popular today IS bad, which is her point. Smut does not good literature make.>>24689879I actually went out of my way to read it and while it looks like that on the surface it's more a regular low fantasy set in not-china and not half-bad desu. Plot is a bit unsubtle but I enjoyed it.
>>24690055You’re a moron. I’d hire the ultimate matchmaking service to find me a wife 100% compatible with me across every possible metric.
>>24690066>has more money than anybody>wants a wifelol retard, absolute buffoonmonogamy is slave morality invented to keep proles in their place, it doesn't apply to god-kings
I’m a man and I read pornSmut is better than cinematic porn. More vivid views into the thoughts of the characters. More room to explore kinks that can’t quite be captured on film. You can build hotter scenarios by having a wider cast of characters whereas porno clips usually stick to the bare minimum of the people having sex in that clip. The acting in porno movies is also consistently bad and the dialogue is almost never good. Things are possible in smut that are unfilmable, or even illegal to film. It’s the pinnacle of pornography.
>>24689637You either didn't watch it or you did and managed to miss the entire point holy. Her point is that using sex to sell books is transforming the industry into low quality hornybait. The sex scene is the entire book objective and build up and everything else is secondary and getting hammered into the bare minimum.She is not asking for prudish books, she is asking for books to not be porn which is not the same thing as sanitizing.It is literally happening to videogames too. When games are not a souless DEI fest like Veilguard or Concord they are gacha games.>>24689822desu i don't subscribe to the view that you need to be good at something to recognize when it is bad. I'm not a good football player but i know when i see a bad one and i can identify why he is bad.>>24690066>I’d hire the ultimate matchmaking service to find me a wife 100% compatible with me across every possible metricThe degenerates have already done that in pic rel
>>24689637>eventually killing things like anime or anything actually fun"If I can't watch PORN then what's even the point of life??" fags are the most insufferable retards on the planet
>>24690080> i don't subscribe to the view that you need to be good at something to recognize when it is badOh yeah I agree. I mostly agree with her points in the smut video (although I think she has slightly too much radfem anti sex neuroticism). I meant her writing advice in her other videos, I've watched most of them.
>>24690079Me too but it's still bad to have it normalized. Apparently feminist librarians are handing it out to 12 year olds. It's immensely fucked.Wireheading should be resisted.
>>24689967But we do have a conservative mainstream culture.21st century western “liberalism”, contrary to its self image, is extremely reactionary and puritanical>Democracy and freedom are bad, aristocracy by another name and authoritarianism are good>Moral norms are strict, rigid and unquestionable>Heterosexual sex is more repressed and policed than it has been since the 1960sThings like rape smut and lolicon are the epitome of 21st century counterculturalism. What we have today is not actually liberal at all, it’s an extremely rigid civic religion based on a cargo cult of various civil rights movements that calls itself liberal because those movements were liberal, but under the skin the real bones of that civic religion are technocracy.
>>24690108>>Democracy and freedom are bad, aristocracy by another name and authoritarianism are good>>Moral norms are strict, rigid and unquestionable>>Heterosexual sex is more repressed and policed than it has been since the 1960sThose are based though why would I change that
