[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>/lit/'s Silksong
>7 days away
>no hype
what gives?
>>
The GR reviews are painting a promising picture, so I'll definitely have to take a look once it comes out. One went as far as to say "It could very well be a century-defining novel . . ."

"The most significant German novel since THE MAGIC MOUNTAIN.
A masterpiece in every sense."

Alright, alright, fine. Jeez.
>>
>>24690645
/lit/'s silksong is the new pynchon novel
>>
>>24690746
aint no one excited for the "new" pynchon
>>
>>24690754
I am. Looks fun. I like Pynchon, simple as. Some people still read on here, shocking as it may sound.
>>
File: 1756227070960796.png (40 KB, 200x200)
40 KB
40 KB PNG
>>24690746
this. we even had multiple threads when his new novel was catalogued to be released.
>>
>>24690766
Still, shouldn't we at least discuss what's interesting about the book in the OP since that's what the thread's ostensibly about? Don't tell me it doesn't look at all worthwhile. You can care about two literary works at once. All the discourse I can find on it online is utterly positive. They throw around titles of comparison like Ulysses and GR and IJ, words like "century" and "Literature" with a capital L.
>>
>>24690766
you read one pynchon you read em all
>>
>>24690746
BASED
>>
>contemporary european doorstopper references kabbalistic mysticism
it's like a cliche at this point, the whole encyclopedic novel is cliche. if you want to "explore" renaissance art or the reformation, publish a real history. i don't care about historical musings by some dude from the english department. i'm over this kind of book.
>>
>>24690771
What's there to discuss? All any of us has to go off of is that one blogger's review from half a decade ago. Not much to talk about
Even when it comes out you don't get to have daily threads about it, reading takes fucking time and this is a doorstopper to boot
Maybe in a year you will see it gain some traction. Literature is not a hype medium unless it is the midnight release of Harry potter
>>
>>24690824
plenty of reviews are starting to come out and they're all raving
>>
>>24690827
And? You want to discuss the reviews and get all giddy like a schoolgirl and have a thread of anons going
>aww man this is going to be soo good!!
Take a hike to r/truelit. See you in a year when someone here will have actually read it and have something to talk about instead of stroking their baby carrot penis to the thought of le century defining masterwork
>>
>>24690810
my feelings exactly
>>
>>24690840
>>24690837
go back to rsbookclub
>>
>>24690645
What is it?
Why is it good?
>>
File: BWEEE.jpg (51 KB, 828x878)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
i'm excited for both pynchon's octogenarian death rattle and lawson's cuck-by-english metatranslation of Scheißefroh's "psychogeography of the hypersoul" !! i'm excited for spring time wind and winter morning clarity !! i'm excited for my suicide and the amnesia of my next birth (likely as an Indian grub farmer) !! i'm excited for the sun's burn out and the coming post-carrying capacity death of 8 billion human beings by starvation and worse !! we've done it before !! we'll do it again !!
>>
>>24690837
Yet people don't complain like this when Pynchon's new novel is announced and people talk about what it'll be like. Whatever. I'm going to get back to my book, since any conversation here's an uphill battle.
>>
>>24690837
>>24690847
Faggots there are exactly four places on the internet to discuss books. There's r/truelit, there's r/rsbookclub, there's twitter, and there's here. Only here do you have to pretend you've never heard of and never go on the other three.
>go back go back go back
We both know you are also on r/rsbookclub.
>>
>>24690865
Ah yes, those riveting thread that get all of two replies "commenting" that pynchon sucks now or has always tucked and then proceed to peter out and fall to page 10 in a half hour (slow board)
Yeah I am sorry schattenfroh doesn't get the same accolade. It must be frustrating
>>
>>24690888
>he immediately outs himself as a redditor
Nice going fag
I only use that site for my niche fetish. My niche hobbies I'll engage with whirl avoiding interactions with bottom feeders such as yourself
Go back
>>
>>24690856
kek wtf
>>
>>24690903
same the only reddit i've ever looked at is /r/tickling
>>
>>24690903
>there's 4 places online to talk about books and two of them are subreddits, so --
>heckin REDDITOR detected! Heckin LE CRINGE!
Alright
>>
warum auf englisch
>>
>>24690645
Max Lawton got outed as a hack translator. I see no reason as to why I should trust his translation. He also admitted to not knowing German and how he had to heavily rely on a German language/culture specialist to complete this translation. Lawton is just completely cooked as a translator. There's no reason to trust him. His only justification is "muh accreditations" and "muh I wrote good English prose" and even that last claim is highly questionable.
>>
>>24690888
Go back faggitor
>>
>>24690926
I didn't start the thread, retard
>>
>>24691077
Ok. Then I guess that makes it two of you who need to go back



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.