[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0063.jpg (35 KB, 612x1000)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
Update on this: I finished reading it, I really had to battle through. The prose never got better, jarring is probably still the best word to describe it. How Döblin structures sentences, makes up words or uses them in a completely false context is just awkward, I didn’t like it, I guess, expressionist prose just isn’t for me, but I’ll steer clear of Döblin in the future.
Not all was bad though, the book also had some impressive vivid scenes of religious ecstasy, communal festivities and especially gory battle scenes. If you’re into Taoism, it’s also interesting, although I didn’t really understand why the protagonist (Wang-lun) did what he did most of the time. If you’re into 18th century China, go for it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.