>writes a scene in his book about childrens having a gangbang
>"Who is Stephen King?" >"Judges? ...I'm hearing we'll accept Stephen King. We also would have accepted 'I don't know, some Jew probably'."
That tweet of his about the Epstein list was so hilariously self-incriminating.
man that was awful. it sorta ruined the book for me. there’s actually some cool parts in it. but the way he throws that in near the end is such a fucking pedo move.
Who cares
Has anyone ever asked him about this?
In great Brazil, all children participate in a "bombom party" between the ages of 8 — 12. It is something of a rite of passage before the advent of puberty. And yes, due to the crowded nature of our streets, covered in Brazillian motorcyclists, inbred ponies, psychotic crossdressers, experimental drug addicts, and rabid curs, these "bombom parties" often take place in sewer systems beneath our wonderful cities. Perhaps King witnessed one of these events whilst in Rio or Brasilia, and implanted it inside his voice. It's actually quite healthy, I think. Really bonding experience.
>>24694871fpbp
Yeah what the fuck was that, it should've had way more, shit was hot af
>>24695154Is that real? What the fuck. Rancid shit hole country.
>>24694865he strikes me as being jewish
>>24694871>da JOOOS!!Obsessed. Antisemitism is a mental disorder
>>24695308It’s just on BAP’s fantasies that he thinks will come true when America is just like Brazil which he has repeatedly says it needs to become
>>24695531well then so is orthodox jewry xD
>>24695531how convenient for you genocidal faggots
>>24695531Should he have not posted Stephen King either?
>>24694865Literally how is he not in federal prison yet?
>>24695536Every single one of that BAP/Moldbug/Thielian crowd are freaks. They're not guardians of Tradition, they want to use it as a skinsuit to promote their own perverted agenda. They may be useful for now but actual rignt-wingers should keep in mind that they're not viable allies long-term.
>>24694888Link?
>>24694865That's not all>Writes the scene from the point of the girl and describes six dicks and what they doAn weird, almost homoerotic, attraction to boys aged 10-12, not even in puberty, permeates almost all of King's books. >At least one unnecessary and out of place sexual detail about a boy between 10-12 in a book>Weird pairs of an older man, young boy>Young boys are often the subject of violence
>>24695753https://x.com/i/status/1945107938307092765
>>24695909What a shit
>>24694865What a fucking creepy weirdoI bet he's been on the Lolita Express and on Epstein Island Never read It but thought it was dumb, I don't wanna read about children being haunted by a stupid clown. I'd rather read about anthropomorphic cats killing each other in war
>>24695154im brazil and this is bull shit.
>>24695531have you tried not to be jewish?
I've just finished reading Under the Dome. There are four instances of people pissing or shitting themselves in the first 150 pages, and I think I counted eight or nine in the entire book. That's his fetish. But you can't politicise that, so people ignore it.
I can't defend him sometimes and I've read all his stuff multiple times
>>24694865If he was Japanese /lit/ would be calling him based
>>24696727It's not a clown, it's an immortal interdimensional monster>I prefer YAwe know
>>24697184King recounts the moment he first got paid.>looking around our shitty trailer home I tell my wife I just got a $400000 advance for Carrie>she doesn't understand>I tell her again and she looks around our shitty home and starts cryingFuck /lit/ and fuck 4chan, King earned his motherfucking success as a son of the working class. But /pol/tards love to wage war against the poor so there you go.
>>24695531It’s not too late to stop genociding entire peoples and be a good human being
>>24694865I put forward the motion that this board always has more than one SK thread and its unnecessary and it clutters the board up. Just make a standing "SK General" and be done with it.
>>24694865Tell me why you think it's wrong for teenagers who are the same age to have sex with each other. Include your age and ethnicity. I'm doing a survey.
>>24697954this sort of attitude is what led to entire boards full of generals.
>>24697961I don't care if they are teenagers. But it should only be with one person in a lifetime. Bound by holy matrimony>31>North Indian Kshatriya
>>24695732None of them profess as conservatives, methinks you don't know what you talk about
>>24697954But that's not very "/lit/" of you, these spazzes love to hate King because it's a contrarian opinion and by the way? None of the anons screaming about the underage sex scene actually give a fuck about it. It's all performative.
>>24697907Retard he writes like a homosexual pedophile, it doesn't make him evil but it's a flaw
>>24697947There is something extremely perverse about an antisemite trying to lecture others on being “a good human being”
>>24698011I think it's sadly amusing how they turned you into them. Let's see if your fall is as spectacular as theirs.
>>24698011
>>24697907What the fuck are you babbling about?
>>24695531I can see your nose
>>24697978>None of the anons screaming about the underage sex scene actually give a fuck about it. It's all performative.slide thread. or just plain shitty posting. Contained in a big SK GENERAL, all these malcontents can all get "performative" with each other. I mean they'll just have that much more fun.
>>24698087That post was just too fucking hard for you to understand huh? Okay let me break it down.>Stephen King is popular>on his own merits>this makes loser anons mad
>>24698211People ITT we're calling him out for his pedophiliac tendencies then you got really defensive and started crying about the heckin /pol/tards. Makes you think
>>24694865I can go to ao3 and find a lot worse.
>>24698789Ok so King and Fujoshis both get thrown into the sun
>>24695531This. We are so fucking persecuted you can't even suck a baby penis ritually anymore.
>>24697961>11 year olds who don't even know how to masturbate (their sex knowledge is explicitly detailed in the book)>TeenagersIf the protagonist were at least - at least - 13 or 14, the scene wouldn't hit as much. But you have kids who barely crossed the threshold of puberty, who don't even know what their dicks and cunts do (there's a scene describing how Beverly get aroused from seeing dicks for the first time), suddenly having an orgy in the sewer, right after they defeated a monster. It's one of the most stupid scenes in an already stupid and lazy book. Furthermore, the only older kids, kids that are aged 12, are the bullies, which are only one grade above the Losers (5 to 6, so 11 to 12).It breaks the immersion and was written with one hand.>Kids too young to know the dynamic of sex, with undeveloped physiological abilities, have an adult style orgy in the sewer right after defeating a monsterAll the normie talk about Beverly being molested (King isn't a subtle writer; if she were molested, you'd know all the details in a 20 pages monograph) or about the ending of childhood or loss if innocence (it's implied they returned to being kids and forgot all about the sex and each other, as if never happened, right in September - this being the sudden amnesia and memory recovery plot that forms the propulsive backbone of IT: fragments of something horrible resurface from the heroes as they get a call; this hooks the reader; the reader keeps reading) is an attempt by normies who can't even parse elementary symbolism in Ulysses (Bloom's journey mirrors that of Odysseus) to pretend to be literary critics and seeing meaning where there isn't and never was one - in a Stephen King book, and especially in one obvious masturbatory, for the writer, scene. King, by the way, explains his philosophy of writing in the Bill Denbrough's first chapter in IT - there's nothing wrong with an entertaining story and depth and symbolism and themes aren't important. He spelled the whole matter, through his self insert, in the story; there's no reason to excavate for something that isn't there because there's one simple reason the orgy there - King found it entertaining.And I'm saying this as someone who has read more King than is necessary for a /lit/ poster, from all his career.>99>Janitor from Tamil Nadu
>>24694865>childrensHELLO SAAR!
>>24695531post nose shlomo
>>24694871Aldous Huxley would also have been acceptable. >>24695531The definition of antisemitism is telling the truth about jewish history and behavior.
he earned that orgy
>>24698782Because it's lazy and predictable. People who've never read King will cite this shit. They're targeting him because he's a leftist, not because he writes about SA or whatever. If you read IT you could talk about his deconstruction of 50s Americana (btw it's explicitly stated that Bev was NOT molested by her father) but it's easier to cry about a "child gangbang" and leave it at that. It's lazy. You have a lazy mind.
