Skip one of these and you turn out a complete retard.
>>24695038You're a clear example, for starters.
I think I've mastered grammer more then logik and rethoric.
>>24695038What goes in the medium item slots? Dicks in two holes and a wound?
>>24695038
>>24695042>>24695074>>24695175Thanks for proving my point.
>>24695042fpbp
>>24695042>>24695074>>24695175>>24695609>t. total anti-intellectuals
>>24695038This is my trivium in three books guide.>GrammarChicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation>LogicThe Book of Proof>RhetoricParadise Lost
>>24696103The grammar in the Trivium is Latin and Greek.
>>24696129The grammar is for whatever language you're speaking or writing.
>>24696163Which grammar is? For the Trivium the grammar is Latin and Greek. I looked up your book and it's about English. Also grammar in the past was more of a philosophical subject, with stuff like what you see in picrel.That's from this book: https://archive.org/details/logicorrightuseo00wattHere's another old book:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summa_Grammatica
>>24695038>caring about grammer or rhetoriclol pea brained op back at it
As a general rule avoid anything published in the last century.¤Institutes of Grammar by Priscian of Caesarea¤Summa Grammatica by Roger Bacon¤Summa Logicae by William of Ockham¤Logic or the Right Use of Reason in the Inquiry After Truth by Isaac Watts¤Port-Royal Logic by Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole¤The Organon by Aristotle¤Rhetoric by Aristotle¤Isagoge by Porphyry¤Lectures on Logic by Immanuel Kant¤Lectures of Logic by G.W.F. Hegel¤Metalogicon by John of Salisbury¤Rules for the Direction of the Mind by René Descartes
