Recent readings of Hegel, such as Malabou, have emphasized the open-ended nature of his system...As opposed to closed metaphysical readings, this ontological reading emphasizes emergence and discontinuity and rupture. Therefore, we may suspect that Absolute Knowing perhaps takes on the shape of a new thoughtform in our contemporary era...There have been many readings of Hegel. For a long time, emphasis in continental circles was upon folx like Hyppolite and Kojeve and Bataille, who alas offered lil more than an aesthetic update and a weak marxist synthesis. However, there are many more interesting Hegelians who hath fallen into obscurity since then. Figures such as FH Bradley and Giovanni Gentile. Appearance and Reality and Theory of Mind as Pure Act are both incredibly lucid and thought-provoking attempts to go beyond Hegel.Is anyone else here aware of any other post-Hegelians worth reading?Also, discuss the future of Hegel! (Both book and idea generally)
>>24700299>At one point he literally told me that all other work either agrees with Hegel so is redundant, or disagrees with Hegel and is wrong.Sounds like he needs to read D&G's Difference and Repetition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculative_realism
Yes OP Hegel’s historicism and historical teleology is his weakest point. I think most 21st century readers would think so. The concept becomes some thing in which consciousness is, but the movement must actually be driven by individual consciousness, and that means it isn’t forecastable, not even retroactively. “Retroactively forecast by Hegel” lol To view time as a linear intuition of the becoming of the concept is actually [vorstellung]. But this isn’t the core of Hegel’s philosophy anyway. You can appreciate the concept of spirit in the Phenomenology without thinking it walks a straight line.
>>24700292Someone needs to make a Middle Path Chuddha edit of this
>>24702089No he doesn't
