Honestly, Stephen King is going down with equal importance to say a Dostoyevsky.
>>24700775YesSeriously, are there any contemporary """"literary"""" fiction writers that come even close to matching the King? His finger was almost presciently on the pulse of the zeitgeist, his understanding of the 20th century everyday American psyche, his symbolic language, his provocative themes and ideas. All of it is unmatched. History will vindicate the airport sloppa and crucify the sacred cows of critics and academics.
Epic bait
>>24700795Get your cock sucked and have a real good cum
>>24700798Thanks I will
>>24700804Film it and send it to me
>>24700809Sent ;)
>>24700775Dosto? No. He will be remembered on par with bram stoker or someone like that however
>>24700775I haven't read any of it but as far as I am aware it is slop. Good slop, but pulpy slop nonetheless. Nothing of high art, ground-breaking or revolutionary.He also wrote a child-gang bang, so there is that.
Who is this dovstovsky guy? I’m sorry I am new to this board.
>>24700775What metric? Engagement? Cat videos weigh more than both.
>>24701016Dostoslopsky? He was an orthobro. They are aware there is no eternal truth and don't pretend to have any, it's literally just something to think about before dying in becoming. You have to throw up an orthobro salute. No reason allowed since they aren't Christians and might possess heretical beliefs they can outbro Jesus.
>>24701037I just read a bit and him and it says he was a communist before prison… well, I am glad he returned to the word of god. But Stephen Kimg just has to be a better writer I mean have you seen IT?
>>24701055Yeah that's the problem with trying to outbro Jesus. No orthobro is a christian. Slopsky was whatever he was told to be.
>>24700775King is good, he's alright, fine. I don't like how much he swears tho. 19th century literature turnt me into a prude, the more an authors swears or uses smut the less favourable of an impression they give me. Books can include graphic scenes and themes without being overly gritty. I'm inclined to call it unnecessary, because a good writer can describe an awful situation without having to describe the texture of brains or the hardness of a quivering cock or whatever. King is a potty mouth and that bothers me. People should swear less.
>2+2=5>ha ha ha>now all the newfags who don't know what a shill is will respond, to "correct" me that it's 4>I am paid for all the replies>I do not see them, I'm already starting another zero effort one-post spamthread>ha ha ha
>>24701099So you’re saying Stephen kind isn’t the better writer? I don’t believe you. How come this is my first time hearing about dostosky then?
He'll be largely forgotten like Harold Robbins/Georges Simenon within 20-30 years after his death.
>>24701129who?
>>24701138Exactly. Two all-time bestselling authors who have been dead for a few decades.
Stop shilling your crappy books, Stephen. Go be a pedo some more.
I have read or listened to most of King's books.I don't think he is a Hemingway or a Steinbeck. The writing is simple.There may be a few novels or stories that disappoint. Reading his whole library boils down to a year of my existence. I would not trade that year for anything. I am the "dear constant reader." His auto biography "On Writing" is his best work. His politics are wrong. He will be known as the GOAT in 50 years.
>>24700775I reread a bunch of his books. I remember I loved them as a kid, but now they bore me to death, all his characters feel incredibly samey and his endings are always ass (except Pet Semetery)
>>24700775We would be better off if we held Dostoevsky to the same level of esteem that we do King. In many ways he is is the superior of that silly Russian mystic.
>>24700775Stephen King is like "oooOooh let's come up with a spooky gimmick to entice middle aged housewives, and then ramble on about an unnecessarily convoluted plot that ultimately says very little of value"
