I'm in love
>>24705921Who is she (heart eyes emoji)
>>24705921Who is that?Why is she good (is she good)?Why is here nose suspicious?
>>24705921Why is her lower jaw thirty years older than the rest of her?
dont know why she showed up on my youtube recommendations one time. i ignored her because she seemed like pick me, and also i just generally hate gender obsessed analysis' from either side
the Scully phenotype is peak
her hands describe the length of cock she took last time
>>24705921Imagine the paleness of her nipples
women disgust me
>>24705921She looks like a very sniffable dentist
>>24706024No problem. It's not illegal to be gay anymore. Happy you found your boyfriend.
>>24705921She looks really pretentious and insufferable for it.
>>24705921>ring spottedFUCK
>>24706079I've gotten head from a married woman before, it means nothing.
>>24706096Degenerate.
>>24705921mommi
>>24706100It was her choice, I'm a degenerate for allowing it? Am I every woman's keeper?
>>24706133No, but you betrayed your fellow man>>24705921Watch her first video, the scully haircut + hairdye is doing all the work here.
>>24706133>t: Satan
Has anyone read her book?
simps deserve death
>>24706163Simping is peak tradition.
am i autistic because i came here hoping people would discuss her videos and not just her looks
>>24706179No one cares about her videos.As long as they are vaguely anti-modern, it's all fine and good.
>>24706139Your fellow man is the enemy
>>24706139I was in a lot of pain, and needed relief. It felt good having another man's wife wrap her lips around me until I came. People who make me feel good matter more to me than people I don't know.
>>24706139Fellow man is a very open-ended supposition and I encourage anybody to cuck office-drone manchildren if they get the chance. Our true fellow men must understand the consequences of being unworthy of respect.
>>24706191>>24706203>>24706204Manlets detected
>>24706203Black behaviour.
>>24706223Vital, honest behaviour. Some might even say being cucked by your wife is white behaviour.
>>24705941fuck that is a brutal comment.
>>24706204Becoming a manwhore is how you handle pain?
>>24706150I tried it and found things I didn't like immediately. The character 'sniffed' the air and shit like that.
>>24706179The most common comments will always be the ones with the lowest barrier to entry.
>>24706280Nta but yes
>>24705941Pre-aged by promiscuity and/or antidepressants and/or the vaccine
>>24705921The fake skull is gay. Don't show it off if it's not the real thing.
>>24705941Telltale sign of recent peasant ancestry in there somewhere
>>24706150>A note on language pronunciation and naming>A map
>>24705941let me guess she's british
>>24706133Yes retard. Women are like children. My ex tried to hookup recently and shes been married for 10 years. Flattering but she had my kid so i had to turn her down because she would fuck 3 lives up just to get dicked down.
>>24706139>hair dye Into the fucking thrash
>>24705921She knows. That's quite literally her grift, and her own writing sucks.
>>24705946>ugly woman clearly tries to style and dress herself like attractive woman (gillian anderson)>tards like you fall for it
>>24706079Married women are even easier. You think she's fucking her husband still? You gain points for simply not being married to her.
>>24706472I know they are like children. I am not their father.
>>24705921>vocal fry in every fucking sentencedisgusting
>>24705941it's an irish thing, they all look like that. they joke that its a genetic evolution from all the wifebeating over there
>>24708551Layne is an Irish name?
>>24706209Ok beanpole
>>24706359Can I borrow yours?https://youtu.be/6Rgnz_fqpM4?si=SnOY-6OGfV5bis0I
>>24706267>let me insert my specific fetish hereNot today, shlomo
>>24706150It's good. Nothing super mind-blowing and some of the plot-twists are signposted a mile away, but it's an enjoyable enough read.
how's the new video?
>>24709772Terrible
>>24709772>>24698263
>>24709772Diet post-modernism ruined culture but dumbed down for retards who don't actually read books. A better and more coherent argument than Peterson.
>>24709772>>24709896both her take & the contemporary take on evil are lame.like imagine the goofiness of writing a story where you're intentionally going to make a hero and a villain. isn't this dumb to you? doesn't that seem wrong in a way? it's only appropriate for fairy tales to tell children so they don't go getting lost in the woods, because then the big bad evil wolfman will snatch them up. most stories are juvenile in this way because it's the author twisting around reality to get what he wants. a good author only permits himself to design the world, the characters, and the setting & then lets the natural forces play out to their conclusion. it's the only artistic and aesthetic way to design a story. you can really see how childlike and immature pop culture is because literature had this figured out centuries ago.
>>24709772sex
>>24710240Her view of evil is a very traditional one rooted in classical philosophy, I wouldn't call it lame. Deliberately creating a villain to oppose the hero is an ancient practice, and it's at the heart of a wealth of classic literature; Arthurian romances, Shakespeare, Dickens, Faust. Granted, it's not the only way to write a story, but calling it just fit for juvenile fairy tales is a gross distortion of the craft.
>>24710272that's just an appeal to authority, and i disagree with it. i could bring up philosophy too and mention how plato pointed out the danger of stories as a form of propaganda, how they make us care about things that didn't happen and their power to brainwash us. the actual high point of the european literary tradition is the evolution toward realism because it's not meant to brainwash you, it cannot trick you, it's just slicing a piece of reality out and putting it into a book as if you had lived it, and gaining the wisdom from that experience.what is the actual use of crafting a villain? why are you willingly propagandizing yourself, to view the world through a more emotional and less realistic lens? if you do this with fiction, i assume you do it with real life as well, and you are quick to both villainize and to lionize people IRL. which is a shame. it's bad judgment, and it won't help you at all with life. it won't help your morality, it won't help your knowledge, it won't get you anything but a cheap emotional high.
>>24710307"Heh isn't the story more adult and complex when everyone and everything is amoral grey goo?"Calm down grrm
>>24710307>because it's not meant to brainwash you, it cannot trick you, it's just slicing a piece of reality out and putting it into a bookL o lEven a tiny fragment of writing is steeped in the bias and noise of the person who wrote it.
>>24710335does your house have morality? do trees, birds, rocks have morality? is it a moral event when a person crosses a street, or is that just something that happens?>>24710340there's probably always some bias, so with that in mind why would you try to amplify it even more?
>>24710350You don't. But you also don't make retard 19th century delusional claims about language being perfectly rational and a 1:1 map to reality. Your postulates are wrong.
>>24710350Okay you're kind of being an Insufferable pedant. Obviously when we are talking about good and evil we are talking about conscious entities. Literature has used villains to explore the human psyche since the very first story was written down. Stories aren't instruction manuals, so it's not propaganda for a story to have a villain. An antagonist to a protagonist allows a writer to externalize internal conflicts and dramatize choices and consequences, and provide a dialectic to explore morality, psychology, and philosophy.Villains and heroes predate the concept of a children's story and are vital and fundamental to the greatest literary fiction that has ever been produced by mankind.Fuck outta here with your sophomoric postmodern drivel
>>24710356language doesn't have to perfectly map to reality because it does map neatly to concepts in our minds. like if you read a good memoir you're genuinely gaining wisdom from another person without having to live out all those years. but it can only be a good memoir if it's honest. if they instead come up with some bullshit fanfiction version of their life that distorts all events like an unreliable narrator, then you can't actually take anything away from it because it's just jumbled nonsense, whereas real life does have order and meaningful patterns.but i really think most people hate realistic literature because they lack a sense of interior judgment and need to be told from above how to interpret things. that's why the authorial hand is so incredibly strong in most stories and myths, they're meant for the masses. this is also why visual art that's popular among the masses increasingly leans into fantasy and ignores realism, and it's only in cultural golden ages where the importance of realism shines through in the arts. for as contrived as shakespeare's writing can sometimes seem, it still has incredible depth even now and a deep understanding of human nature>>24710377it's not post-modern at all, it's realism.
>>24705921I'm in love too, but even more uwuposhi is love. posh is life!
>>24710307No, fuck you. The portrayal of only absolute realism inevitable devolves into materialism, obsession with the physical, the vulgar. Literature and art are not and never can be an expression of pure reality, they never have been, and it has never been their goal. You think Michelangelo's David could ever be real? The myths of every world-culture depictions of something that could be real? The greatest literature in every age and culture has always been reaching for the sublime, something that for lack of a better word can be termed "greater". And that can never be found in shallow realism which only conceives of what can be seen with the eye.Let's try changing things up a little, because people always get caught out at this part. What do YOU think is a good story that exemplifies everything you're talking about? Something that takes a slice of reality and puts it into a book, as you have said. I've already given examples of my side, what's something that embodies your supposed ideal literature?
>>24706150she writes chinese fantasy?
>>24710406>You think Michelangelo's David could ever be real? The myths of every world-culture depictions of something that could be real? The greatest literature in every age and culture has always been reaching for the sublime, something that for lack of a better word can be termed "greater". And that can never be found in shallow realism which only conceives of what can be seen with the eye.i'm not saying there's such a thing as true artistic realism. the very fact that it's art precludes it from being a truly faithful representation of whatever it's depicting. my view is that art falls on a scale from realism to fantasy, and art generally suffers across the board from leaning far too heavily into fantasy. the claim is not that art needs to be like those photorealistic paintings of a dog or whatever. something like hemingway's the sun also rises is a perfect example of a stylized novel with a realistic core. of human bondage is another great example. my favorite film ever is the great happiness space, it follows these principles to a tee. the pursuit of the sublime remains the same in any case. a person with high intuition may come off as a materialist because he sees more in material reality than the typical person. but it's the same principle at play. in fact, a person who's a complete daydreamer would look at you and ask why you demand any realism at all, and feel any attachment to the material world. your response would be that the material world is the source of your values and aesthetics. well, the same applies to me. that's why i am a realist. it's full of value and aesthetics everywhere you look.
>>24705936She's Irish likely you paranoid fuck
>>24710429>art generally suffers across the board from leaning far too heavily into fantasy.But that is how it has always been. The greatest artists, going by your definition, have always leaned to the fantastical. Furthermore, there is no necessary disagreement between them. The entire art of the medieval age was a blend of the fantastical and the real. And this of course does not preclude the realism you enjoy from being considered worthy, but you can't just go dismissing most of world-art as juvenile because it doesn't suit your tastes for realism. And besides, values and aesthetics have no physical basis in reality, they are themselves immaterial.
>>24710520>The greatest artists, going by your definition, have always leaned to the fantastical.by my definition, they lean heavily toward realism. the classical european art tradition for example puts an extreme emphasis on realism compared to other art traditions of the world, and the periods where it does this less are rightfully considered mediocre. and speaking of the medieval age, i think this period is mediocre in terms of art for the exact same reason our current era of art is mediocre. both eras approach art as a way to express old, decrepit, stale ideas that are always the same, whereas in good art the message is always changing, because the artist simply acts as a medium through which messages arrive from nature, which is the only place that messages actually come from. the greeks even had a personification of this creative side of nature through the muses.how can you create art without the muses? it doesn't make sense. without realism there is no muse. if you don't constantly live with your ear to reality, the muses are silent. you would probably assume id criticize van gogh for being unrealistic, but i admire van gogh because he really was in touch with the muses. he was deeply in contact with reality, and you can tell this because his art style always changed by slight degrees, it evolved in subtle ways for the subject matter. an AI could never do this, because an AI can't study nature, it cannot read nature like a book, it cant understand the subtle feeling that a particular wheat field or hospital room evokes & pull that thread out. van gogh is a beautiful example of stylized realism because his works are deeply immersed in the particulars of the world around him. and that's what modern artists never do now, they don't look toward particulars, they don't look toward their own lives, they can't read the forms of the world around them. that's why they're bad. does that help explain it
>>24710240She seems to despise formulas, but then makes several videos about how things are straying too far from formulas. I don't really get it.
>>24705921she talked shit about pulps so she's clearly a dumb bitch.
>>24710385>realism is when abortions and murder
>>24705934>>24705946>>24706068Samefag kys
>>24709772Who cares.
>>24709772In the age that I'm pretty sure she and her viewers idolize, it would be considered evil to let a woman speak her mind on serious topics and have any sort of influence.
>>24706075Mad she criticized your booktok books?
>>24709772>>24709896>>24710240Good and evil are unhelpful distinctions.Benefit and harm are much more useful.
>>24705941kek
>>24705921So am I.
>>24706472If you didn't call her a whore and told her to stop trying to ruin everybody's life you only did half your duty.
>>24709772It was okay.
>>24705921>we have scully at home
>>24710648>She seems to despise formulas (masculinity), but then makes several videos about how things are straying too far from formulas (masculinity)So your average woman then
Her video on "Why we never got another LotR" was so wildly misinformed that I'm pretty sure she hasn't read most of the books she talks about or done any research into the actual history of fantasy/SF fiction. She seems to think that some of the genre's pioneers are in fact derivative of books that were written much later and in fact were aping those original writers.
>>24711295but she is hot though
>>24711733>anons find midwit jowls-scully hotGrim. Chudbaiting must be one of the easiest grifts around.
>>24705941The meistro!
>>24705921She looks like a down syndrome version of Dana Scully
