>88He's going to die next year at 89, same as Cormac.
>>24710412I was sure he had quietly died sometime during the 2010‘s and am still trying to cope that this could be true and the next whatever will be revealed later as a posthumous assembly of notes.
>>24710468We have at least 3 more novels coming before they tell us he died, Pynchon planned for the future.
>>24710412Is the latest one any good?
>>24710412Wow that's crazy. I always thought Pynchon was much older than McCarthy
>>24710412McCarthys last duet features a rather Pynchonesque character as a self-aware schizophrenic delusion. Will Pynchon's last novel have an appearance by a spitting cowboy who worships violence from afar?
just a remind that no matter how great the art u produce ur still gonna get old and croak
>>24711829Given what we know about the novel, no. >>24712185You must be one of those geniuses I keep hearing about.
>>24712192>doesn't make art for immortalityoh ur one of those dudes who makes art for money/pussy
>>24712211No, just one of those dudes who is sick of people pointing out the obvious and acting like it is secret knowledge that few have.
>>24712321I am... le Ozymandias...! Behold my works, ye wretched, and tremble!!
>>24712328if you do it strictly for money/p***y you degrade yourself. you produce schlock and your soul develops a stink. your very face gives evidence of the corruption within. next thing you know you look at the mirror and you see an andrew tate face. that cartoonish hubris and an ugly emptiness in the eyes.
>>24712321you ... thought that a mementori mori type comment was supposed to be secret knowledge? the fact that you even use terms like "secret knowledge" reveals ur some type of occult clown which is i guess why u post low iq takes
>>247126282/10.
