I like my women like I like my languages: sophisticated, elegant, beautiful and dead.
Heh, very dark my fellow redditor, take some gold!
>>24720511You calling me a nigger?
>>24720514I ain't calling ya for dinner
>>24720506Awesome, clever post! Keep it up OP.
I lol'd
Ahahah OP made a funnySeriously though, does OP necrophiliac???
Pretty good OP. Keep it up, lol. Proud of you
>>24720506>I like my women like I like my gay mpreg slashfic:Endless shiplists.
I like my women like I like my languages: developed in complete isolation, protected by the hostile geography of Northern Iberia and with no known relations
I am gay and don't like women, that's why I study 4 languages including 2 classical languages
This, but unironically.What are some recommendations for this feel? Preferably involving coitus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91gT68xeDMM
>>24722344you could like women if I passed my mental engrams onto you via a vulkan mind meld.
>>24720506I like my women how I like my writing, underdeveloped
>>24720506I like my men like I like my liquor: straight, no chaser.t.ranny
>>24724335I don’t understand why troons want straight men, but not straight men that like troons.Do they not see the paradox?
>>24724342There's a difference between a straight man who likes trannies and a chaser, just like there's a difference between a straight guy who doesn't mind dating an overweight girl and a chubby chaser.
>>24724344I still don’t understand why the distinction is relevant or why demographics as unmarketable as troons or fat women would cull their meagre options even further.
>>24724354Because when I say "chasers" I mean the men who are creeps about it and treat trannies like interchangeable sex objects to fulfill their fetish. A genetic woman wouldn't want to date a man who treated her like that either.
>>24724356Personally I’m a man who has had sex with trannies, and would do so again, but I would never consider a relationship with because I prefer real women. My intuition on straight men tells me the only ones that aren’t of a similar mind are the chasers that actively prefer troons.>A genetic woman wouldn't want to date a man who treated her like that either.There are thousands, possibly millions, of Asian women and fat women that literally do that though. Choosing a partner that aligns with your kinks isn’t mutually exclusive with having a fulfilling relationship in other dimensions as well.
>>24720506then why do you write and speak in English?
>>24724366>Personally I’m a man who has had sex with trannies, and would do so again, but I would never consider a relationship with because I prefer real women.Would you only consider a relationship with the sort of women who are completely your type?>Choosing a partner that aligns with your kinks isn’t mutually exclusive with having a fulfilling relationship in other dimensions as well.I didn't say choosing a partner that aligns with your kinks, I said they treat us like interchangeable sex objects to fulfill their fetish. A lot of them are willing to fuck us in private but not be seen with us in public, which, at least to my thinking, is just cowardly.
>>24724372Because very few other people here understand Latin or Ancient Greek, presumably.
>>24724366>>24724373To clarify further: I don't think every man who prefers trannies is like that, and I'd be happy to date one who does but isn't like that, but a high enough proportion of those who do are that I tend to be wary by default.
>>24724373Types are more guidelines but there are some hard limits, and hard limits for sex are different to hard limits for relationship. If she doesn’t have brown eyes or a juicy ass or whatever that’s something I can overlook. Having a penis, being excessively overweight, being retarded, stuff like that however is alright for sex but inconceivable for a real relationship.The problem with trannies is not even particularly subjective. It’s a matter of the fact that real vaginas are just better. Having sex with a tranny has its charms in some ways, but if I’m to consider a woman to be rest of my life material then she’s gotta have a real vagina. It’s futile searching for a straight man that wouldn’t think the same. There’s a name for men that prefer anal sex with people that have cocks, it’s called being gay, or perhaps a tranny chaser. But hoping for a straight man that isn’t a chaser? Futile. >A lot of them are willing to fuck us in private but not be seen with us in public, which, at least to my thinking, is just cowardly.If this is what you consider a chaser then any consideration of if you’d date them is irrelevant because you’re talking about a demographic that wouldn’t date you anyway.
>>24724399There are plenty of straight men who are very enthusiastic about having anal sex with cis women, I'll say that much.And, as I said, I know not every man who prefers trannies sexually is an objectifying creep, they're just a large enough portion of that demographic for me to be wary. The original joke is half tongue in cheek to begin with.
>>24724410That’s the thing, anal sex with a cis woman is a novelty. It’s taking advantage of several options that are available. But at the end of the day vagina is still the natural home of the straight penis. Enjoying anal sex isn’t the same as committing to only anal sex forever.
>>24724422r/analonlylifestyle is a thing, those people are a minority but so are trans people. (Also it's not only anal, there's oral, and frotting, and so on and so forth.)
>>24724429This is what I’m saying.Trannies are already drawing their options entirely from bisexual men. That’s about 1.3% of the male population. Of that small minority ones that would consider an LTR with a tranny are even smaller still, easily less than 1%. And of that <1% percentage a significant amount of them are going to be fetishists. The whole anti-chaser thing basically just seems like volcel with extra steps.
>>24724448>Trannies are already drawing their options entirely from bisexual men.Depends on your definition of "bisexual", because there are definitely guys who will fuck trannies but not normal men.
>>24724457I’d put myself in that category but at the end of the day I need to get real and acknowledge that having sex with a tranny, or indeed a sufficiently feminine looking twink, is gay as fuck. Any man doing this is as straight as a roundabout. Granted I never identify as bisexual IRL because I don’t want to associate myself with the attention seeking scum that would never actually have gay sex.
>>24724468Isn't there some room for argument depending on whether he's primarily attracted to the feminine features and merely doesn't mind the cock (or, in some cases, does mind but is willing to just ignore it- I once fooled around with this boy in a ceramics class I took in college who was very into me from the waist up) vs. specifically liking the cock? (And of course I don't see how you can argue a man who has sex with a post-op tranny without knowing she's a tranny is anything but straight.)
>>24724472There’s a few dimensions to this. A man who does mind the cock is unsustainable relationship material anyway. Perhaps such a man is straight, but an action can be gay in itself. Likewise for the man who doesn’t mind the cock, which already seems a bit less than straight. But this draws attention to the absurdity of modern sexual taxonomy, as Foucault pointed out. It’s only recently that sexuality was pathologised as states of being rather than actions one participated in. First as a disease, and then later as a species, but along the same logic in either case. Real sexuality is not as simple as that. Often gayness is conditional, or situational, but the fact remains in any case that having sex with a man is gay as fuck (insofar as the word gay is defined in our society). >And of course I don't see how you can argue a man who has sex with a post-op tranny without knowing she's a tranny is anything but straight.Any illusion that she’s not a tranny is going to evaporate the minute her pants are off and the mutilated abomination that surgeons are trying to sell to us as a vagina is revealed.
>>24724489Some of those doctors in Thailand have made some real progress in the past few decades, you know, and there's considerable variation between natural vaginas. There have absolutely been men who had sex with post-op trans women without realizing it. (In any case I don't really want SRS but that's because I don't mind what I have anyway.)
>heh, that's a good one, OP>let's see what the rest of the thread is like>it's just 2 spergs talking about trannies
>>24724498The results of state of the art SRS is a google search away and the results are ghastly. Even if they looked realistic, which they don’t, they don’t self lubricate, they lack any of the internal architecture. If there is a man that put his penis in one of these and was deceived that man is simply retarded, a virgin, or both. But predatory surgeons advertising more than they can deliver is nothing new.
>>24724530>The results of state of the art SRS is a google search away and the results are ghastly.And how many of those pictures are from people who are mere weeks post-op because of the context in which they're found?>Even if they looked realistic, which they don’tAgain, natural vaginas have considerable variation.>they don’t self lubricateDepends on the specific procedure, have you not heard of peritoneal pull-through for instance? (But also, you know there are cis women who suffer from lack of adequate self-lubrication?)
>>24720506I love my women how I love my languages: emotive, violent and blasphemous
>>24724542Natural vaginas with no g-spot, no cervix and no self-lubrication? It’s simply not a vagina, it’s the wound where a cock used to be. There’s a good reason discussion about SRS is higher than ever yet visibility of the results of it remains extremely controversial and suppressed, it’s because the results are disgusting. >Depends on the specific procedure, have you not heard of peritoneal pull-through for instance?Doesn’t provide self lubrication comparable to a natural vagina and that’s not the intended function of its use of moist inner tissue anyway, it’s to mitigate infection.
>>24724564There are literally entire porn subreddits about it, and even one for the niche within a niche of post-op trans women peeing.
>>24724342>Do they not see the paradox?The paradox is what attracts them to the phallus as women, read more Lacan.
>>24724582What?
>>24724576There’s also niche fetish communities about having sex with dead people, animals, being raped, being shat on, getting AIDS, and every manner of unspeakable horror conceivable. That does not make it any less gross.
>>24724585Have you actually looked at any fully healed ones?
>>24724593YesI’d rather look at a cock
>>24724595I mean so would I but I'd rather look at a cock in general.
>>24724596I wouldn’t count cocks as my first choice but there’s nothing wrong with a perfectly nice cock. With genitals as with cola you can’t beat the real thing.
>>24724601Granted, I have never actually had sex with someone who has a pussy, though I am interested in doing so at some point if I get the chance.
>>24724607The internal architecture of a pussy is very distinct, there’s a lot more going on in there than just a hole. If you ever get the chance to try it you’ll have a better idea what I’m talking about.
>>24724613I'm sure. Granted, I have difficulty maintaining an erection because of the estrogen, but as I'm sure you know there are plenty of other ways to interact with a pussy besides with a cock.
>>24724616There is, point remains, the finer points of female anatomy are possibly even more evident with your fingers anyway. Without even considering the chemosensory qualities.
>>24724530>internal architecture>>24724613>internal architectureI prefer interior semiotics.>>24724582All human desire is paradoxical, it seeks to substitute the symbol for the signified. In the case of women's phallic fixation, they seek to occupy the phallus, and the man (or less commonly the woman) they project the phallus onto is obliterated by their fixation on puissance.≥Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream.≥You know when fluoridation first began?≥Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.>Uh, Jack, Jack, listen... tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory?≥Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love. Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.>No≥But I... I do deny them my essence.Furthermore, it is my opinion that people ought to read more Lacan.
