Imagine filling your mind with this much complete trash
>>24722740>He has TikT*kGo back.
>>24722740>I actually had a legitimate breakdown the other daywhy do people feel the need to tell thisand why am I not surprised in the slightest
>>247227401/2048th of what you get on a single visit to /lit/?
incoming cope & seethe, she has a growing social media presence and will probably grow it to a significant sizeshe is achieving self-actualization (peak of the pyramid - in Maslow's hierarchy of needs) while you chuds keep seething
>>24722740>4chan user complaining about someone filling their mind with trash
>>24722740imagine filling your mind with the memes you parents told you are real and believing this illusion you call world is reality
>>24722757gr8 b8 m8
>>24722757>self-actualizationHebrew nonsense
>>24722757Unironically this
Platonically speaking not everyone was born to be a philosopher. If she's inclined to read trash so be it, as long as it's not degenerate stuff women read, in that case it would be sinful and debasing
>>24722740to be expected. she has the uniform on
>>24722740This is why "reading makes you smart" is such a jokd nowadays.
>>24722871Booktubers would be smarter if they actually read books and continually challenged themselves. But I get what you mean: these performative airheads give literature a bad name
>>24722847Look at the colour of those spines—unequivocally pornographic romantasy, all of it.
>>24722926Let's hope not
>>24722933Popular + Fantasy + that many pages (inequivocably modern) = smutslop.I read an anon leaving a scalding review of Warded Man the other day (500 pages of cuckporn crownee by gangrape) only to find it has like 200k reviews and a 4.25stats on goodreads.
>>24722757>you’re juzt jeluozz12 year old tier post
>>24722740What even are those.
>>24723227Romantasy slop trash
>>24723227You see, you need to understand, Women won't read something unless it promises to provide an erotic ("spicey") experience to stimulate her insane emotional fee fees. Romantasy provides a soft 'cover' for the sex obsessed lit-erotica she's consuming like catnip by disguising the erotic purpose behind the fantasy facade.Women obviously despise space abd science as well so it's not likely you'll find many (any) of these set in a science fiction genre
You can see on basically every page the undercurrent if every interaction between the sexes is sexualized (but only the hawt guys), which is frankly exhausting and ridiculous. In this exert from the appalling Rebecca Yarros massive bestseller the protag has barely survived a harrowing ordeal and is being saved by an old friend yet of course her first thoughts are about fucking.If the story has any teleos its the creation of constant sexual tension which we must unfortunately assume is how women actually experience the world.
>>24723497>>24723227>>24723466Why don't these girls just read books with graphic rape scenes like Clockwork Orange?
>>24723526It's vaugely a homosexual experience for the women as they're really partaking in the fantasy of another women.
>>24723526The teleos of clockwork orange isnt sex. You don't seem to understand that the entire book must exist solely for the purpose of the protag having sex.
Indeed, nothing could be more dissapointing to a romantasy addict than starting an "erotic" novel only to discover its really about philosophical concepts or politics or something equally "boring" to the hypersocialized modern sexual women.
>>24723519the day women discover ai smut is the day the publishing industry dies
>Imagine filling your mind with this much complete trashYou're scrolling TikTok
>>24723466>matched with a girl on bumble>"I read fantasy and romance, like fluffy romance">in one of her pictures she standing in front of a Booktuber style shelf with multiple copies of Onyx Storm prominently on displayHow over is it? Will the sex be wild? Actually, she hasn't messaged me back after trying to setup a date even though she said she'd like to go on one (common ghosting tactic).
>>24722740What's with Fantasy being so woman focused? I always look at the dustcovers of whats on display at book stores and the summaries of the fantasy stuff is always foid coded.
>>24723802Beyond over
>>24723802Depends, how dominant are you relative to her?
>>24722747>why do women lie for perceived social creditRight up there with why do birds fly
>>24722740I too feel overwhelmed by the amount of series I have started and have not yet completed. Eventually I will run out of space and will have to reluctantly switch to a Ebook.
>>24723831because of insufficient supply of the D in real life.
>spicyHow do we stop the infantilisation of language
>>24724082Social media now has to be approved for toddler's because every baby has an iPhone with TikTok and TikTok can't control that babies use the app. But TikTok can moderate your language.
>>24724084I dunno, millennials latch onto media for children like no one else so they may be the root of that.
>>24724088No. It's 100% because you can't use the word sex or sexy on TikTok.
>>24724170You also can't use words like suicide, murder, or rape, which is why they use words like grape for rape or 733t speak type replacement letters.
>>24723519First person can be done well. Present tense can be done well. But first person present tense is an abomination.
These books have no intellectual or even emotional value outside of sex. I don't get the point. I mean, I do, but the pervasiveness of women claiming this is literature is alarming. The last few girls I asked for book recommendations rec'd me Sarah J. Maas and Rebecca Yarros and when I replied with incredulity they insisted the books really were really good and that I should definitely read them; which just speaks to the intelligence of these chicks.
>>24724403Do women use these as aids to jack off, or do they just watch porn like everyone else? Do they seriously think it's literature? It's a mixed bag in my experience.
>>24723497I'm surprised these women openly admit to reading porn. It used to be it was a subject no one wanted to discuss, let alone let others know they consume.
>>24724082Oldspeak unbellyfeel.
>>24724427Yeah they use them as a masturbation aid.
>>24722740>Imagine filling your mind with this much complete trashA woman's mind should be full of the phallus.Furthermore, it is my opinion that people should read more Lacan.
>>24724088>another episode of braindead zoomcucks blaming millennials for core gen x cultureChange the channel.
>>24724665>Millennial deflectiontypical desu
>>24723831If I were to guess, it's because fantasy usually focuses on the characters whereas science fiction focuses on the environment, so it's a lot easier to adapt the former to romance when everyone gets bored of urban fantasy
>>24723802None of these women can fuck. They're into the idea of fantasizing about getting fucked and emotional high / mind games of it not the act itself. Like ED for porn addicts
>>24722740Bitches going through their YA and teen porn addict stage all in their late 20s - 40s is still funny too me
Rebecca Yarros looks insane to me
>>24724082Then stop the feminization of language first
>>24727006Holy shit she looks like a human labubu, thats fucking grim. You'd only need me to go 24 hours without sleep and you could convince she was some demon of enfebleed minds wearing a human skin.
>>24722740Its a woman. Schopenhauer basically said women are supposed to be loved not understood. You'll get it someday.
>>24723497>women despise spaceYou've clearly not met my exes, thats all they wanted
>>24723662Good thing its primarily a thing for guys
>>24722757DELETE DELETE DELETETHIS IS GOING TOO FARI'M THE CHAD, YOU'RE THE SO_YJACK
>>24722757>self-actualizationWith social media? That shit limits your self-worth, ruins your soul and destroys communities worse than the television did.
