[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


This is terrible to read. Idk if it's the translation, but I'd rather read Hugo than this and Hugo is famous for being wordy. I thought Dickens wrote for the uneducated, however it is hard to imagine some 19th cenzury person who only barely reads reading this and having Fun. Twain is the real Dickens.
>>
Retarded poors in the 19th century went home from the factory and read for their 2 free hours before bedtime.
>>
>>24726392
Dickens is great, especially Oliver Twist.
>>
>>24726392
It's one of his starker novels; the musical tricks people into thinking (it should be) otherwise
>>
>>24726422
19th century factory workers were more literate than modern Oxford grads.
>>
>>24726392
...so what is the twist?
>>
>>24726707
The twist is that it's almost void of that Dickensian sentiment and intimacy for which he's famous, and loved
Only the poor and very poor figure is perhaps why
>>
>>24726392
I read it and I expected it to be all about Oliver Twist and the Artful Dodger and their boyish adventures, and it just ended up being a stupid ad*lt romance novel. Lame.
>>
>>24726862
>and it just ended up being
a proto-existential novel of incredible bleakness (ftfy)
>I read it
simpleton



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.