/lit/bros? maybe this whole "female slop" genre isn't actually that bad...
>>24727522>Man doesn’t like books for womenObviously
"Some dumb take." - Some Literally Who
>>24727522By conservative they mean sex between a dominant man and submissive woman, and not some transexual orgy that involves all manner of freaks.
>>24727536your quotation marks should be asterisks btw
>>24727522i keep staring at his handswhy does he have a foot where his hand should bethat has to be some kind of syndrome for the palm to be that larger/long in relation to the fingers
>>24727558Unironically that’s one of the features of Down’s syndrome
>>24727522>conservative propaganda
>>24727560its like a weird gorilla hand. never seen anything quite like it. im pretty sure the proportion is only off by maybe an inch but its very uncanny. if not downs its definitely something. people dont have hands like that.
>Mfw it’s not a qt, composed redhead telling me chicklit is trash, but some seething ogre.Opinion discarded
>>24727561>"STRONG WOMAN" becomes a docile, submissive housewife to an alpha maleI can see it.
>>24727574If anything the greater conservative subtext of smut is that the blank self insert FMCs at the start of the books are always miserable, broke and alone. Regardless of their educational credentials or line of work. They are not strong or happy, they are desperate for Scrooge McKnot to sweep them off their feet.
What’s the designated term or grouping for these types? It’s not Marxist or leftist, there has to be something more on the nose.
porn for women has to be "conservative" because "traditional" thought describes the female libido as is, whereas feminism presents an aspirational view they hope (unrealistically) to achieve through social engineering. actually existing vaginas don't get wet at men crying about their feelings. actually existing vaginas don't care about consent because they predate the concept. so romantasy can only maintain a superficial facade of feminism that comes down as soon as the erotic content begins. i guess from a loony leftist perspective it looks like a purposeful propaganda tactic but it's just how the product needs to be built to meet audience expectations.
>>24727631They're just liberals. Liberalism is the entire ideology of libertarianism, conservatism, and liberals. They're all one box. If they complain about conservatives, they're complaining about liberals that are moving too slow.
>>24727522I’ve always wanted to create a romantasy slop called The Beanflicker Trilogy, but actually be about a main character that flicks magical beans at other characters. Oh, and fucks round a lot.
>>24727544>xir doesn't like being dominated by menI would think most men do not fantasize about being dominated by men. That's very normal.
>>24727647The tranny in the screenshot is a self-identified communist
>>24727522That’s funny because I just listened to that redhead’s video about the degeneracy of romantasy and her video and overall channel appeared to have a conservative slant. Lord willing we can get both sides to condemn slop.
>>24727809>I would think most men do not fantasize about being dominated by menIt's what we call straight men.
>>24727640Good post> "The inability of a woman in being attracted to a man who isn't enough "strong" or "tall" reflects the inability of detaching from the patriarchal order where the man is the leader and the woman a subordinate property".-Weiniger.But I'd argue the patriarchal order is an institutional elaboration on that spontaneous tendency more than the other way around. Women only have the model of success and power men have established and bequeathed onto them, the second they operate within that model they are acting as a proxy male, denying and forfeiting their woman status and along with it their happiness. Even in literature, men primarily relate with characters developing skills and overcoming challenges. Women relate with characters who experience dramatic events around them, some sort of upheaval. Even with the subvention of the girlboss, they fall again in the same pit trap of masculine self-denial, and the need to re affirm the feminine, now through submissiveness to an even more exaggerated male archetype. it Notice that the key difference is participation. Women rarely use words that describe them acting or participating. It's always about things around them just happening. They don't see themselves as agents, perhaps because women are physically weaker and have, historically (in a context of biology) less of an inherent authority to dictate and shape the world around them through force.
