>He could not come to any other conclusion: women were indisputably better than men. They were gentler, more affectionate, more loving and more compassionate, they were rarely violent, selfish, cruel or self-centred. Moreover, they were more rational, more intelligent and more hardworking. What on earth were men for? Michael wondered as he watched sunlight play across the closed curtains. In earlier times, when bears were more common, perhaps masculinity served a particular function, but for centuries now, men served no useful purpose. For the most part, they assuaged their boredom playing squash, which was a lesser evil; but from time to time they felt the need to change history - which expressed itself in leading a revolution or starting a war somewhere. Aside from the senseless suffering they caused, revolutions and war destroyed the achievements of the past, forcing societies to build again. Without the notion of continuous progress, human evolution took random, irregular and violent turns for which men (with their predilection for risk and danger, their repulsive egotism, their volatile nature and their violent tendencies) were directly to blame. A society of women would be immeasurably superior, tracing a slow, unwavering progression, with no U-turns and no chaotic insecurity, towards a general happiness.
Retarded. Women are worse at everything except one.
>>24730637Or you could, you know, watch any sex segregated survival show were despite the best efforts of the producers to craft a narrative of sex equality, women live in abject squalor as they die of cold, thirst and hunger until they crawl to the men's encampment, were they have figured how to fish, make furniture, and construct waterproff shelters. Ive seen this experiment trice and it always ends up the same way.
>>24730637>>tracing a slow, unwavering progression, with no U-turns and no chaotic insecurity, towards a general happiness.It would certainly be the realm of the deepest leveling and chinoiserie.
>>24730637If women ever got the upper hand in society over males, it’d be exceedingly simple to establish a matriarchy. Males lose almost all of their sense of self-control and self-esteem once their dicks are caged in a chastity cage, which would occur in a matriarchy under the guise of preventing sexual crimes by males. Sperm can be stored and frozen, while artificial wombs are a lot harder to make so women are still needed for the population while males mostly aren’t. Males are also more aggressive, risk-taking and tend to more dangerous task/decisions, so stripping them from positions of power in businesses and what not by a matriarchal government under the guise of not taking such risks would effectively render males as blue collar workers at best. It doesn’t take much to go from there to full slavery.
>>24730637>character that is an inhuman fag whose goal is to take the nature out of nature thinks women are better because they're nicerthat's the point, Michael was retarded, a typical contemporary intellectual
>>24730779>protag is fucking retardedI love stories with this trait, you know it’ll be fire but you need to read to find out if it’s fire writing or a dumpster fire
>>24730772That's why its important to eliminate them and replace them with artificial wombs and sex robots
>>24730795Why is it fire writing in this case?
>>24730790Oops, meant to reply to this with this >>24730993
>>24730637Anon by that point in the story the book has already repeatedly obvious that Michel is a sheltered naive sperg with almost no experience with women or social relationships in general
>>24730637I also thought that but look at female politicians like Hillary, Victoria Nuland or Von Der Leyen, they are as callous, psychotic and warmongering as any male politicians
>>24730772And yet women will never do this because they have little agency and are deeply, to the core of their being, dependent on men.
>>24731062I helped some lesbians move recently and it showed me what a zero testosterone environment was like and it was not pretty. I basically had to ok all of their decisions even though I didn't care at all, and the baby they just had kept thinking I was its dad and wanting my attention.
>>24731184> the baby they just had kept thinking I was its dad and wanting my attentionDamn, sad if true
Every decision made by a woman with broad real world impact has been a negative for the society they have power over.
>>24731040Also had an absent father and was raised by his grandmother as an only child>>24731062They are effectively men according to Hbecq. He's not at all a feminist of the kind that thinks men and women are equal. He thinks the character of women in the natural hierarchy - clement, compassionate, empathetic, skillful in child-rearing and caretaking - is what makes them superior to men. This is of course paradoxical and why he had to write the retarded epilogue
>>24730772prison or exile, the choice a man must make
>>24730772Sad, pathetic cope.Weak autistic nerds have for the vast majority of human history exerted complete control over society despite having low aggression or prowess. No matter what point in history you care to jump around to, this was always the case. >Go to stone age pacific island? A spindly shaman is telling the war chief what he can and can't do.>Go to 14th century Poland? A 5'1" bishop who's done nothing with his life but read books is having his ring kissed by a 6'5" gigachad lord of war.>Go to dynastic egypt? Pharaoh must observe the (contrived and compromised) religious advice of his weak chinned high priests>Go to the hordes of Chingas? They're following the advice of his magicians.>Go to.... And so on.The "muh physical strength sexual dimorphism" shit is absolute, ABSOLUTE cope. Transparently so. Nerds with zero comparative strength have been tricking Chad into doing their bidding since before we left the caves. For the majority of history with magic, and currently with the legal and financial system. In spite of this fact, never once, all over the earth, have females achieved anything remotely similar.
>>24730637Okay, nice bait. What did the author write?
>>24730637>They were gentler, more affectionate, more loving and more compassionate, they were rarely violent, selfish, cruel or self-centredHahahahah
>>24730637>they were rarely violent, selfish, cruel or self-centred>selfish>cruel>or self-centred>rarelyBAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHA
>>24730637If women were required to gain power and status to attract a mate then you can bet a million wars would be started by them too. Their meekness is not because of some general goodness or kindness, but because they don't need to be violent or ambitious to procreate.
>>24730637If women controlled society we'd still be living in dirty huts dying from the cold. Matriarchal europe that got destroyed by invaders shows it's a failure
>>24730772I am sure there have been matriarchal societies on this planet but each and every one of them were short-lived and crashed and burned, either dissolving within a generation, dying off, absorbed, captured, what have you.There aren't any records of these because they quickly went away and in human history we tend not have records of short-lived failures, especially ones people want to forget.
>>24731828>if women were different they'd be differentmaybe, but they're not.
>>24731992you missed the point
>>24731490Pretty retarded to turn history into the dichotomy of a 2000s high school movie. The truth is intelligent people dictate history and the stupid masses follow. There have been plenty of virile, stout, tall intelligent men and many weak, decrepit, cowardly golems who do these mens bidding and vice versa.
