[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now being accepted. Click here to apply.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1677770507916.png (2.14 MB, 2604x1608)
2.14 MB
2.14 MB PNG
I'll start

"ontological"
>>
"midwit"
>>
>>24732744
being obsessed with categorizing and fitting things into charts
>>
I don't know what ontological means.

Does this mean I'm low IQ? It has something to do with why things are, I think.
>>
>>24732771
as opposed to why they aren't
>>
>>24732767
Spbp
>>
>>24732771
>I don't know what ontological means.
usually meaningless verbal filler used by midwits to sound smart. the /lit/ equivalent of valley girls saying "literally" all the time. it can usually be left out and if it can't there are many better ways to express the same thing.
>>
>>24732780
Cool, I'm gonna stay retarded and not look up the definition.
>>
>>24732744
According to this chart i'm thirties, is it over for me?
>>
>>24732771
>>24732780
It’s similar to saying “inherently.” A person portraying an other as “ontologically” evil is a very specific description: it is not just an attribute, but a fundamental part of what they are.
>>
>>24732793
saying something is evil is the same thing as saying something is "inherently" or "ontologically" evil you fucking midwit
>>
High IQ = whiteness = contribution to capitalist surplus

Pure evil, I’m siding with the animals
>>
>>24732744
dismissing the existence of bigfoot despite compelling evidence
>>
Idk if ramanujan was that smart, many people mention that he didnt have a formal education in mathematics, except he did, he went to college, but he failed every subject that wasnt related to math
>>
File: big keks.png (191 KB, 322x480)
191 KB
191 KB PNG
>many labor all life to formalise what the godspawn mention in passing
>>
On top of that, IQ is a bs metric made up by psychologists, it is not derived from anything observable in the brain
>>
Was Nietzsche a godspawn?
>>
>>24732840
i'll wait until i get my test results before i agree or disagree with you
>>
>>24732801
I could call your mother an nasty bitch. That doesn’t mean being nasty is a fundamental aspect to her, I’m just pointing out one attribute.

But if I called her ontologically fat, then she is inherently fat: being a landwhale is the core of who she is. It’s not something that can be shed away: her fatness is inseparable to who she is as a person. Learn what words mean you ESL faggot.
>>
>>24732841
neetch and jung, i can't tell which one i hate more. reading either will poison your intellect and sanity.
>>
>>24732801
What do you think inherently means? Why do you think that word exists?
>>
>>24732784
I've looked it up 50 times. It's not a complicated concept but the fact that its meaning never sticks in my mind implies it's relatively meaningless, it doesn't do any work.
>>
big mad cuz he cant hang
>>
>>24732851
Reading geneology of morals has made me a human being, but it's possible i'm kinda undereducated. What writers do you recommend?
>>
>>24732858
>Reading geneology of morals has made me a human being

Given that pathetic statement, I'd recommend you start with Saul of Tarsus.
>>
>>24732861
Lol, i was just raised in catholic family, sorry :( Please no more religion
>>
>>24732744
This is a standard term in philosophy so this is very stupid.
>>
File: IMG_1301.gif (1.83 MB, 640x496)
1.83 MB
1.83 MB GIF
>>24732847
>her fatness is inseparable to who she is as a person
>>
>>24732767
Correct.
>>
>>24732876
OP’s mother is Ginny Sack. When she goes camping, the bears gotta hide THEIR food
>>
>>24732744
This is a standard term in philosophy.
>>24732867
Oh..yeah this.
>>
>>24732744
I work among researchers every day and every single one of them is in the 110-140 range.
"Godspawn" would be 140-160. Most IQ tests don't even exceed 160 and those which do are extremely unreliable because of how small the sample size is above that point.
>>
>>24732744
words:
>dunning-kruger
>cognitive dissonance
>slippery slope
>ad hominem
>whataboutism
>AI
>crypto (-currency, not -logy/-graphy)
>here's why
>source?
>NPC
>bugman
>birth rates
>midwit
>brainlet
>chud
>incel
>foid
>IQ
>fascist(s) / fascism
>commie(s) / communis* / Marxis*
>JQ
>(Charlie) Kirk
>Bernie
>imagine if _____ did this
>debate
>wow
>yikes
>seethe
>booster
>diversity
>DEI
>pounce(d)
>dereliction
>[number] ways to ___
>our democracy / threat to democracy
>soience
>trust the science
>my own research
>misinformation / disinformation
>shill
>glowie
>russian bot
>>
>>24732767
thread should have ended here

it does for me, anyway, not reading the rest
>>
File: apu4.png (19 KB, 200x232)
19 KB
19 KB PNG
>>24732744
>tfw 130 IQ sperg
How to avoid trooning out?
>>
>>24733359
if trooning out would make you happier then do it anon
>>
Retarded thread, first of all, most iq tests never get beyond 160, so youre a fucking retarded midwit for that.

But also, the higher iq you are, the stronger correlation with mental illness, its like you retards dont understand IQ, its the same with the opposite side of the IQ curve, its just that their mental illnesses are like disabilities rather than personality dysfunctions.

Your idea of what high IQ people are is a complete fabricated delusion.
>>
>>24733396
>the higher iq you are, the stronger correlation with mental illness
I wonder if back in the cavemen days they thought the same.

>us 60 IQ grugs normal
>100 IQ grug mentally ill
>>
>>24732767
As opposed to fitness dick in your mouth?
>>
>>24732767
>erm, actually everything is a spectrum, sweaty. like gender
this is the true midwit take
>>
>>24732744
>"ontological"

Why? What's wrong with the word? Fuck you.
>>
>>24733425
Cavemen were higher iq than us. They simply chose to live with minimal technology after their Ted K. published his manifesto. Read The Immortal by Borges
>>
>>24732771
That NAFO le maymay saying ontologically evil which used it incorrectly really did damage

A better word to use is ontology, which has to do with how you perceive reality. Like the Ontology of a sodomite is either totally whacko or übermensch to ontologically prefer loose poopy shithole to nice tight pussy for sexual gratification
>>
>>24732744
not 'ontological' but stuff like 'ontological evil', which is meaningless because 'evil' is a privation, and thus has no being in itself.
>>
>>24733596
yeah yeah yeah

raping a child is like... no palpable dark vibes here... just like a "privation" you see... dude's just "missing the mark"
>>
>>24732744
"gifted kids" are almost always in the 110-130 midwit range and they were only "gifted" because they were in a class of retards
>>
>>24732767
Discrete categories exist. only the mentally impaired would dispute this.
>>
>>24732841
Nietzsche was in the thirties and Richard Wagner (PBUH) was a god spawn.
>>
>>24732801
I thought it had to do with being or some shit

if something is ontological it metaphysically exists or something

but non-essential qualities metaphysically exist according to a lot of philosophy niggas

so ontological as an adjective would seem to extend to non inherent shit too

that is to say ontological is over and above essential, its closer in meaning to existent

or so it seems to me
>>
>>24733696
do they exist ontologically or are they a spatial metaphor for our spatial-sensing monkey brains ? ? ?
>>
>>24732932
Based



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.