[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Existing is inherently painful and non-existence is the only real escape from suffering.
Is he right?
>>
>>24747576
Nope
>>
Non-existence doesn't exist
>>
>>24747589
kek
>>
>>24747576
What pessimists tend to underestimate is that humans can develop masochistic beliefs and practices to cope with that notion, also that German Idealism in all of its charlatanism and sophistry is more attention grabbing than a sob story about this “evil” world.
He’s right but Mainlander and others have dangerous beliefs since if life is about avoiding suffering then you may forfeit life altogether to be complacent and resign yourself into submission of it through forced solitude and inaction which Nietzsche critiqued as being the “Last Man”.
In a sense we are all pessimistic but more like Hartmann in that we deny its residence in our minds in order to push our troubles onto others or for a later date
>>
>>24747576
no one is right and no one is wrong
>>
>>24747576
Not for me.
>>
>>24747576
Wow what a unique thought
NOT
>>
>>24747576
>non-existence is the only real escape from suffering
happiness is also a real escape from suffering
>>
>>24747576
let me guess he didn't off himself right after saying that
>>
>>24748042
That's a pretty good point anon.
>>
>>24748181
He did, actually
>>
It may be true but doesn't mean one is preferable over the other. Pain is only one facet of life (usually)
>>
>>24747576
>Mainländer expressed the desire "to be absolutely in all things submitted to another one once, to do the lowermost work, to have to obey blindly"
>kills himself
I don't think this guy could be right about anything
>>
>>24747576
depends,for some people theres a lot of pleasure to be had.
but personally after ~20 years (ever since i had conscious thought) of almost constant anguish i agree,i am at my breaking point and will end it soon otherwise i would just end up lashing out on someone else because the pain has put an endless anger inside my heart,i am perpetually raging and thus unable to even distract myself so its better if i kill myself.
>>
>>24747576
>Now, if death is without all sensation, a dreamless sleep, as it were, it would be indeed a wonderful gain. For I think if any one selected a night in which he had slept so soundly as to have had no dream, and then compared this night with the other nights and days of his life, and after serious consideration declared how many days and nights he had spent better and more pleasantly than this one, that not merely an ordinary mortal, but the great king of Persia himself, would find these but few in number as compared with all his other days and nights.
- Plato
>>
Lichtenberg says something to the effect that the memory of past pleasure is pleasurable; the memory of past pain is also pleasurable; it is only present pain that is painful: therefore existence is more pleasant than painful. Something to consider.
>>
Hes right about existing being inherently painful but theres no escape from it due to the scientific fact that time is circular. The second you die, you're consciousness is teleported back to your birth, you live the same life over and over again for eternity. all you can do is try to make you're eternal suffering a little worse.
>>
File: julio_cabrera.jpg (7 KB, 200x280)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>Philosophers and people in general should understand that what they call “value of human life” is not value of human life in its being, but they are pointing to the values which humans are compelled to create precisely because life, in its being, is not good. (We do not need to give value to something already valuable). Our defensive and vindicatory actions try to make life something good (or at least tolerable), and these actions are confused with the being of life itself. Human life is, in any case, a conjunction of structural disvalue and positive intra-worldly invented values. And the persistent tendency is to take the seconds as if they were refutations of the first. (I call this the “fallacy of the way back”). But the existence of positive values is not the refutation of the disvalue of the being of life, but, on the contrary, its powerful confirmation: the worse are the rigors of being the more intense and dazzling are valuing intra-worldly inventions.
>>
>>24748421
Books for this feel?
>>
>>24748485
spiderman
>>
>>24748042
>le cope
Stopped reading there.
>>
File: spock_incredulous.jpg (15 KB, 272x296)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>24748421
Big if true.
>>
>>24749423
I read the rest and you absolutely made the right decision.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.