[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why was JK Rowling's portrayal of fat characters in her books so mean- spirited?
>>
To post a picture of yourself as Hannibal from the A-Team to boast that a ruling in the court changes the legal landscape in a way you approve of, knowing the ruling will upset some people and your boastfulness will upset them even more, is a very mean thing to do, and I think JK Rowling may be a very mean lady. It's the same level of meanness as the people celebrating Charlie Kirk's death where for a certain type of person they perceive any disagreement with them as fundamentally evil. This makes meanness justified and even righteous because all opposition deserves humiliation and death. For JK Rowling, this may include fat people.
>>
>>24749066
she felt an obligation to be accurate
>>
Being fat wasn't as common and therefore was seen as undesirable. The common acceptance of undesirable traits is but one example of the dysgenic degeneration of the western world.
>>
>>24749066

Even a broken clock can be based once a day



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.