[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


It's not even a meme, the absolute state of the femoid is just a void. She unironically has no soul, no self, no real will. She's a metaphysical NPC running on a script of pure necessity. That's why she's completely alogical and amoral, incapable of understanding concepts like justice, truth, or even guilt, because there's no inner "person" there to be accountable. Her entire existence is fragmented, she lacks a continuous memory or a unified identity over time, which is why she has no desire for immortality. What "self" would there be to preserve? She's not a "being" in the same way a man is, she's essentially just matter without form, an ontological nullity that has no intrinsic value, no dignity, and no relationship to anything absolute or real.
>>
>>24753921
Completely cringe take. Go outside, breathe fresh air, spend some time with people, go into the woods/mountains, do some sports.
>>
She rejected you didn't she
>>
>>24753921
Mostly true and based. However, there are very few noticable exceptions. Recently I found a very blackpilled ebony findom who perfectly understands the psychology of depressed beta losers like myself. I already spent more than 500 euros on her. My conclusion is that some women can be capable of empathy, it's just very rare.
>>
>>24753921
you know you could just as well direct all of these criticisms at men and you'd be just as correct? its human beings that are quite horrible and shallow as a whole, not just the women. real human beings are very few and far between in this world. and they seem to come in all shapes and sizes.
>>
>>24753981
This assumes men and women are the same which is demonstrably not true
>>
>>24753994
they are not but both men and women can be good humans in their own unique ways
>>
>>24753921
Machines are capable of logic and apes are capable of being moral. Are you really sure these things indicate a form of higher being?
>>
All the faults of women are ultimately the fault of men, for it is men who are responsible for the maturity of the human spirit. It is men who have turned women into what they are.

She smatters her image all over social media. She damages this world with her every movement. She never speaks the truth but only speaks that which is most convenient. She never has to face the truth because every step she takes in her home of modern marvels is coddled and every brilliant construction of men is hidden from her for her convenience.

The truth is she is pathetically equipped to exist in the uncaring natural world. And she is nothing more than a neurotic skin-bag filled with blood that desperately needs men in order to survive. She is nothing like the spirit of men, a beautiful spirit tasked with overcoming the whole world.
>>
>>24754153
>ll the faults of women are ultimately the fault of men, for it is men who are responsible for the maturity of the human spirit. It is men who have turned women into what they are.

I absolutely disagree and detest this take. if women are supposed to be as rational as we are, then the same rule applies. This is just a roundabout way of saying women are babies, but you'd take issue with that as well. simps are pathetic.
>>
>>24754191
You just said women lack rationality. Now you're saying it's their fault for not acting rationally? Which is it?
>>
>>24753921
It's pretty insane he gets his whole theory of memory from Alyosha's last lesson to the boys that leads to the whole 'hurrah, Karamazov!'. And his whole thing on the awakening of genius conscious is exactly like Alyosha's memory of bowing to the earth in his convention with the spheres.

The duality in people isn't male, female; self, shadow; yin, yang; good, bad; godly, beastly. It's the fantasy of prosecution and defense. The duality in people is the prosecution and defense that he will experience in the last judgement. Women experience sexual maturity from a very young age to the point where all girls have a most startling awareness of 'getting what she wants', experience of what the world truly is through pleasure. It's like when the band kids start getting freaky and their personality totally changes, they become completely self possessed in such an unrecognizable way. It's similar to the thief 'caught in the act', 'without defense'. And even then women plead in the courtroom, man either stoically accepts the charge through actively loving his judge (suspicion), or he 'acts the buffoon' IE humiliates through compensation. That's what creates the whole 'men are infinitely more mysterious', the well of compensation. Woman has despair and hysterics because she has 'being loved' for security. Man experiences suspicion and compensation
>>
>>24754153
Are you saying that men who do not whip and beat their wives and daughters into submission are at fault?
Are you suggesting that men who do not force women to wear full-body niqabs are at fault?
>>
>>24753957
post name
>>
>>24753921
Weininger is a right about a lot of things, actually most things, actually he's more right about the meaning of life than almost anyone I know, but is wrong about what he's most famous for, and he even denounced his work, calling himself a murder, right before his suicide. I suggest one goes to the man besides Jesus who Weininger admired most, Richard Wagner, and experience the poems of Die Walkure, Siegfried, and Gotterdamerung to understand woman's potential for metaphysical greatness.
>>
>>24753921
Not quite wrong, but not quite right either. Left to their own devices, women are much closer to pure physis than most Western men. But one of the ways that you can achieve actualization as a metaphysical being is through elevating women by drawing them out above their own physis through acts of erotic, romantic, and even spiritual worship. There are few real women anymore because few contemporary men have the power to make women real. Blaming the women for this is totally nonsensical because, as you say, their original state is as an ontological void.
>>
>>24754530
>There are few real women anymore because few contemporary men have the power to make women real.
I've noticed this
>>
conclusion: I should read Weininger
>>
File: inuit-warms-wifes-feet.jpg (123 KB, 1239x826)
123 KB
123 KB JPG
be nice 2 women
>>
>>24753921
>the absolute state of the normalfag is just a void. it unironically has no soul, no self, no real will
Fixed you.
All of them are cheap imitations of real deal.
>>
>>24753946
You are either roastoid or knightcuckold in rusty tinfoil armor.
>>
>>24753951
>>24753946
Who asked you?
>>
>>24754982
>>24755004
I think some of you should switch to /out/ and /fit/ for a while. Oh yeah and touch some grass while you’re at it.
>>
>>24754377
Very interesting, who are your favorite writers
>>
>>24753957
You could not have sunk your post any harder
>>
>>24753981
No, that would make no sense. As a criticism of women it makes sense.
>>
>>24754243
Its absolutely not a dichotomy. Your attempt at making it one is feeble.

>>24755018
I dunno does your mom's pubic count as "grass"?
>>
>>24756596
Stack some plates, my guy.
>>
>>24754954
Not a single woman is nice to me, so no.
>>
File: 1740085065092.jpg (233 KB, 1051x1249)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
>>24754390
Unironically yes
>spoil your daughters
>be surprised when they grow up to be spoiled women
>>
>>24753921
Most humans are soulless NPCs with no internal dialogue, you can't generalize broad categories like "Man" and "Woman" without including race and class.
>>
>>24754153
I'd like to ask all "burden of men" posters: Has there been a society, ever, in any time or place, that has elevated women?
>>
>>24756864
It’s disgusting when men hate their sons
>>
>>24756864
>that pic
What's wrong with that, specifically? Do you think your parents and grandparents weren't raised that way?
It even follows logically that the weaker frail child is the one spoiled. You absolute idiot.
>>
>>24753921
Every moron that reads weininger quickly forgets the painstaking detail he goes into to define the words "male" and "female" and those morons then come to stupid conclusions like OP.
His take on geniuses is a lot more controversial and implies some interesting realities of the world.
But hey, lets focus on the feminist/incel ragebait that ultimately stems from not understanding the material.
>>
>>24754153
Correct and the fault in modern society is that women and brown people have any rights at all. Luckily, we're working on that.
>>
>>24756864
Do people/ parents seriously think like this and do this?
This is a messed up thought process. Women arent inherently worth more than men
>>
>>24753957
lmao
>>
>>24758507
>Women arent inherently worth more than men
Yes they are.
>>
File: IMG_0857.png (1.15 MB, 1693x580)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB PNG
>>24755779
First and foremost I consider myself a student of the magi Palingeni Stellato. I get everything from the Vitae. Especially in how it inspired Shakespeare's first poem, Venus and Adonis. It's funny comparing it to Weininger since both of these poems are mostly known now for their pro-sexual union arguments. Their cosmology, their worldview, it takes so much of the typical existential, philosophical, historical arguments and ensouls them in this total Karamazov logic. I think reading them in that knowledge gave me a separate, innocent sense and 'underground' education. I have a discreet, otherworldly true education compared to the intellectual ideas of other young people and the way they conceptualize life thanks to teaching of my magi Palingenius

The first thing I consider myself to have ever seriously read was Dostoevsky's 'A Gentle Creature'. I didn't like Dostoevsky before that, I was annoyed with his image. But reading that I found the most perfect aesthetic sense and moral coloring I ever believe believe possible to be found. I’ll have respect for Dostoevsky forever after that. The last outburst of the pawnbroker
>>
>>24754191
>if women are supposed to be as rational as we are
shit literally no one said besides liberal feminist apologists.
>>
File: 15678524145.jpg (93 KB, 588x700)
93 KB
93 KB JPG
>>24753921
basado
>>
File: 1747670469410404.jpg (92 KB, 976x850)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>24753957
>>
>>24758109
>Do you think your parents and grandparents weren't raised that way?
They had to work for a living retard
>>
>>24756677
I'm going to stack my balls on your mom's chin
>>
>>24760980
They solely exist as walking incubators so no. Most discoveries in science and the creation of art and culture come from men. A society ran by women would fall apart in a week. There has been literal experiments done on this.
>>
>>24760994
Well then why does the majority of society take it at face value?
>>
>>24753957
> who perfectly understands the psychology of depressed beta losers like myself.
An LLM can do the same and even gives solid advice. Understanding and knowing are two different things.
>>
>>24753921
Unfortunately, Weininger's wisdom is wasted on those who understand him, and those who instinctively accept his premises either lack interest or need to become aware of such things. Men are completely fascinated by the female figure, to the point that even their escapism often includes fantasy versions of them. Society is degenerating and will continue to degenerate into a whim that men will constantly indulge in in exchange for a promise of love.
>>
>the philosopher always becomes such as the result of a perplexity from which he tries to disengage himself. this is plato's thaumazein, astonishment - a very philosophical emotion (theatetus, 155D). but what distinguishes ungenuine from genuine philosophers is that this perplexity comes to the latter from looking at the world itself, to the former merely from a book, a philosophical system which lies in front of them. this was also the case with Weininger, for he became a philosopher merely over my world as will and representation, and had it not been for this would most probably have concerned himself with quite different things with much greater success, for he possessed considerable rhetorical talent.

t. Schopenhauer
>>
>>24753921
>She unironically has no soul, no self, no real will.
Mfs straight up don't see how they tell on themselves when they characterize their own mothers in this way.
>>
>>24761347
>They had to work for a living retard
And you don't? kek, gave yourself away there you absolute NEET parasite.
>>
File: Wow Chimp.jpg (63 KB, 524x476)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
>>24753921
>All women are philosophical zombies.
That doesn't just extend to women. The philosophical zombie/NPC/Hylic is real, but what percentage of the human species are they? Hard to say.
>>24754530
>>24754645
>There are few real women anymore because few contemporary men have the power to make women real
That reminds me of 15:24 foward in this video https://youtube.com/watch?v=lmHO1R1A4l0l about how modern women are copying the mere shadow of a real man that modern men are.
>>24760993
>Tarkovsky
It is truly strange how different Andrei Tarkovsky's views on art are from basically anyone, for a man of the Soviet Union to have had a true belief in trancedant beauty is astonishing to me.
>>
>>24760993
never heard of Stellato or Novalis, thank you they seem cool
>>
File: Philosophers Women.jpg (168 KB, 667x1024)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
2mpnj
>>
>>24763376
>modern women are copying the mere shadow of a real man that modern men are.
Wouldn't that necessitate that women would follow the manliest men into becoming manlier?
>>
>>24757600
Yes. Women have never actually been oppressed, hot take. Everything men have done or will do is in the service of women because men can't make babies on their own. "Male freedom" is an oxymoron. Though it ought not be.
>>
>>24761698
it must be difficult to live your life thinking entirety of your existence is just your problems with your mother or father. like imagine from the moment you get this retarded idea until your death everything is just somehow has to do with your father or your mother.
>>
>>24753921
there is no point trying to reason with a woman, it's like trying to ask a mosquito to leave your house.
Women's superpower is that they convince men to contest them with words, when they don't particularly care about language, and they usually succeed.
>>
>>24761698
I don't see your point here, not all mothers are benevolent, and not every child was planned, in fact it may be the case that a benevolent mother deciding to have a child is rather rare.
>>
>>24760993
just a follow-up on Palingeni Stellato, how did you read it? I’m not seeing a plethora of editions or resources. Thanks in advance.
>>
>>24753921
I can't be the only one who always reads his name as Weinigger
>>
>>24767468
You are not, brother.
>>
>>24753921
Woman are weak and retarded fuckable males, this was common knowledge for 1000 of years, incels are reinventing the wheel.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.