The Vedantic confession that only Brahman really is:Mark 18:10>And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.The Vedantic confession that self of Christ is the self of Brahman, and that the carnal body is a phantom, illusion, or disguise of Brahman:John 14:28>Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.Philippians 2:9>But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:Romans 8:3>For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:1 Corinthians 6:19>What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?2 Corinthians 5:19>To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.1 Corinthians 15:47>The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.John 2:19>Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.I have read the books of the Sacra Doctrina series published by the Catholic University of America Press, the texts of the ecumenical councils, Prepare the way of the Lord: an introduction to the Old Testament published by Concordia, The dynamics of biblical parallelism published by Eerdmans, and dozens of other books representing the most recent scholarship on what is today's most popular superstition. My reading of these dozens of books has led me inevitably to a single obvious conclusion that arrogant and superstitious Christians attempt, and fail, to obfuscate.Christianity is polytheistic.Boethius defines a person as an individual substance of a rational nature.Three separate rational persons implies three separate natures.Three separate natures implies three separate gods.Dr. Nina E. Livesey reveals that polytheist Marcionites wrote the Pauline epistles:>To better understand early Christianity, we must look to the social and political circumstances surrounding the rise of Pauline letters in the mid-second century. Such an endeavor resists allowing the letters to create social realities– doing historical work for us– and instead opens explorations into questions of events and factors outside the letters, including those of ancient textual production and deployment. By examining Marcion and his circle, and other contemporaneous second-century writers and writings, we will be better informed of the foundations of early Christianity.Marcion attributed aseity and eternity to a second god.Because there is so much evidence even in my brief argument here, I will conclude my argument against the Christian sophists in a reply.
In John 20:28 Thomas the apostle calls Jesus Lord and God (in Greek "ho kurios mou kai ho theos mou"). If he were not God, then that would be blasphemy and surely Jesus would rebuke him. However, Jesus doesn't rebuke Thomas for calling him God. If you read the Greek, then you'll see that the text uses "ho theos" which is the same word used when referring to God the Father.
>>24754619Even the Hebrew texts confess polytheism:>Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.This verse alone refutes the Christianity of the Hebrew texts as monotheistic.Christianity is polytheistic and all confessing Christians are polytheists.The Hebrew prophets all confessed Hinduism.Only ignorance, prejudice, and absolutely pathetic sophistry prevent all Christians from practicing Hinduism. I have the books of the Sacra Doctrina series published by the Catholic University of America Press and texts of the ecumenical councils, which are nothing but misrepresentations and obfuscations of and common sleight-of-hand tricks of sophists employed against the obvious reading of the Christian texts as confessing Hinduism. Catholicism and Orthodoxy represent departures from the Hebrew prophets, who absolutely confessed Hinduism.
St. Paul confesses that Ghost is Brahman:Romans 8:9–10But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.Romans 8:16The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:Romans 8:26–7Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.Romans 8:34Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.1 Corinthians 2:10But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.1 Corinthians 2:12Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.1 Corinthians 3:16Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?1 Corinthians 6:19What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?1 Corinthians 7:40But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.1 Corinthians 12:3Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.1 Corinthians 12:4-6Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.Galatians 4:6And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.1 Timothy 4:1Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;2 Timothy 1:14That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us.2 Corinthians 3:3Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.2 Corinthians 3:17Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.2 Corinthians 6:16And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
>>24754690Titus 3:6Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;Ephesians 3:16That he would grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man;Philippians 1:19For I know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ,
>>24754619>Three separate rational persons implies three separate natures.No.
>>247546621 Corinthians 15:47>The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.St. Paul confesses not that Jesus was God but that Jesus was a ghost from heaven.This is what Hinduism confesses and makes sense to hear from St. Paul because St. Paul confessed Hinduism.
>>24754713That verse is referring to Jesus becoming man which happened through Mary giving birth to him. Jesus is both God and man.
>>24754734Jesus could not have been a man because he did not have the soul of a human nature. Isaiah 1:14 says that God has a soul:>Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.This must be metaphorical, and so must any mention of Jesus having a soul be. Jesus did not have a human nature but only the likeness of human nature.Philippians 2:9>But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:Romans 8:3>For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
>>24754755Jesus did have a human soul as all humans do. He was born.
Amazing how dindus and muzzies can’t even get the basics right. These are people who openly believe in elephant gods, genies, and flying horses with human heads, but all of a sudden they’re incapable of suspending belief at the idea of three persons with the same nature. Hilarious.
>>24754619>>And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.The context: And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.The man approached Jesus as merely a 'teacher' i.e. a man. He didn't suspect Jesus of even being the Messiah much less God. Thus, since as Jesus was approached as just a man he answered like a man. The question posed by Jesus ("Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God") is rhetorical. If only God is good, and you are calling me "Good Master", what does make me? God.>>Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.The Father speaks The Word (The Son) which is compelled to be spoken by the Holy Spirit (Heart of God)—this, however, does not mean that The Father, The Son and The Holy spirit aren't God. Also, the carnal body has been glorified, no longer illusory or less-than-real. It is real and eternal seeing as it has never been stained by sin, and all good things are eternal. I don't believe this could happen in Hinduism.>>I have read the booksThat's great, that's amazing; that does not mean you understood it or possess sound arguments for your inferences.
