[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is the everyman library edition of this good enough or should I look at another? I hate footnotes being on the back of the book and if this is gonna have a fuck ton I want to know.
>>
I heard the Folio Edition is terrible and the Everyman's Library edition is far better
>>
>>24766038
Just use two bookmarks.

What other extant versions are there, unless you go second hand?

Having got a Kindle I only buy physical if they are cornerstone, showcase books, and I've been meaning to buy this very version for so long.
>>
>>24766038
It's the edition I've got, and I've been getting on with it OK.
All the same, the footnotes are fucking insane: in some cases they take up more of a page than the text.
The worst part is some snotty Christfag commentator called Oliphant Smeaton who insists on shitting up the book.
>>
File: s-l1600.jpg (310 KB, 842x1029)
310 KB
310 KB JPG
>>24766071
I've seen this one but have no idea what the footnotes are like
>>
>>24766038
No, those cut out Gibbon's footnotes completely. Get the three volume Penguin release, that one supposedly keeps them. Will probably be cheaper, too.

>t. remember researching which edition to get a couple months ago
>>
>>24766038
Mine moulded really bad which is strange given that none of my other books have mold on them or ever have. I didn’t even have this problem with my other Everyman’s hardcovers
>>
>>24766194
They must be a different Everyman edition to mine, then.
Admittedly mine are hardbacks dating from 1936.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.