>/lit/ talks all the time about Schopenhauerian pessimism> decide to read his magnum opus>discover there one of the most brilliant metaphysical systems ever conceivedwhy don’t you faggot deal with the fundamental aspects of Schopenhauer’s work? His discoveries and originalities?
yes...YES
>>24770685what?
because he's an unlovable freak
>>24770697wasting words on midwits
>>24770698literally me.
>>24770680Give me an example
>>24770698Settle down Joanna
>>24770698*roastie detected*
>>24770698He's very lovable.
>>24770698you wouldn't let young arthur hit roastie?
>>24770847>that hairline>on a portraitIt was over before it even began for him.
>>24770680For you, anon. Consider reading the first book of the critique of pure reason and Schopenhauer's doctoral thesis.
>>24770680>/lit/You mean Hegel fags
>>24771256Fuck HegelAll my homies hate Hegel
Why didn't Schopenhauer try to integrate his theories on the Will with Darwin's theories on the Origin of Species? They lived around the same time, and the two seem very compatible. The Will could be the explained as the force that drives the evolution of species.
>>24771292>Why didn't Schopenhauer try to integrate his theories on the Will with Darwin's theories on the Origin of Species?darwin was published in 1859. Schopenhauer died in 1860.
>>24770680because its hard to take him serious when he spends a whole chapter coping about being second fiddle to Hegel
>>24771292Because Schopenhauer influenced Darwin LMAO >It has often been argued that Schopenhauer's thoughts on sexuality foreshadowed the theory of evolution, a claim met with satisfaction by Darwin as he included a quotation from Schopenhauer in his Descent of Man.[68]
>>24771292>The Will could be the explained as the force that drives the evolution of species.Because Darwinism doesn't explain it?
bump
