Is there a book that will explain to my why chuds primarily use an anonymous social website with flat rep and post architecture where no poster capital can be accumulated, while commies primarily use an anonymous social website where rep/post capital can be accumulated and used to drown out other voices?
>>24772287great question. i've always wondered about the mysterious lack of right-wing accounts on twitter. and those who do post there seem completely uninterested in building a brand and accumulating a following. very well observed, OP.
>>24772290>the mysterious lack of right-wing accounts on twitterhave you checked the site recently
>>24772287Reddit is not anonymous.
>>24772290>mysterious lack of right-wing accounts on twitterLol
>>24772287there’s a louis theroux doc where he meets notorious racist tom metzger, and it turns out he frequently goes to a karaoke bar that’s mostly non-white."i could only assume that, for tom, karaoke sometimes took precedent over racism."
>>24772287Because the latter is psychologically feminine and they want attention and status. Also their entire society is heard to benefit them.The former is here because there is nowhere else to go. If you are anonymous you can say whatever you want. We are also more psychologically masculine and just care about what’s true.
>>24772346
>>24772287The idea that there’s some consistent “right wing” on 4chan is just a gay meme. The consistent feature is antisocial posters and contrarian posters. This has meant just as much libertarianism as left wing posts and right wing posts the bulk shifting with the social changes through decades. >>24772290> lack of right-wing accounts on twitterYou spent at least 3 years under a rock? It’s Xitter now btw bbgorl.
>>24772287In the digital world, communism actually works
>>24772290How is 2020 anon?
you guys remember olive? a trapfag on /b/ who turned out to be moot.
Just a question of censorship. If a chud’s views are literally banned on Reddit, why would he try to go there?
I am a third worlder brown guy and I get along with white chuds fine. White libs tick me the wrong way. Any books for this feel?
>>24772524bwahahaha
>>24772524I'm a 6'4" Aryan liberal and it brings me great joy to tell short, brown Gusanos that Fidel was a great man, or tell Hindoo "Brahmin" types that their caste system is unjust and must be dismantled. I suspect i have spoken with you before.
>>24772547I am a "lib" in my country because it is a contrarian position. Lots of 4chan inspired larpers from my country don't understand the spirit of 4chan so they larp as Sharia extremists which is the default position here. I am not a redditor. I support chuds in west and liberal policies in my country. How about that?
>>24772547 this is the brown guy>>24772555 this is the whitey
>>24772290underrated post
>>24772287Twitter is more racist than 4chan at this point
>>24772352>there's no real right wing on 4chan>anybody who is right wing is just a blind contrarian Found the leftist
>>24772287Commies are very sensitive. A direct line can be drawn to the site's censorship of unpopular voices to forced labor camps and show trials. One might say, "well no moderation will lead to spam and porn" which I will just retort thats a human nature problem which commies are completely blind to because Marx didn't believe in "human nature" anyways and the human subject is always secondary to economic and environmental forces. Its even quite stranger considering that B.F. Skinner is the American answer to that, only from the polar opposite economic viewpoint of John Locke.
>>24772287Communists don't want to share, they want stuff for free.
>>24773650Every time I make an account there i get autobanned
>>24772293They have usernames but you're right essentially. Its not at all comparable.
>>24772451I guess to engage in less controversial topics like handegg or album collecting.
>>24772293Yes it is. >>24773856No he isn't.
>>24772287strong antipathy against censorship and against architectures that encourage appeals-to-authoritylow psychological urge toward or desire for social statusanonymity works as a perfect defense against character assassination / reputation-based attacks
>>24773803Yes
>>24773914>architecturesBuzzword.
>>24773920your comment is retarded, and amounts to>I object to your use of an accurate descriptor because it is currently a fashionable termstructures with mechanisms like upvotes, post history, or forms of credentialism are architectures that encourage appeals-to-authoritynow say something useful or fuck off
>>24772290In fact I was referring to Reddit, which seems like a curious habitat for a communist or a socialist. Many left wing subs are perfect analogs of country clubs with minimum Karma counts, top posters often get pushed to the top of the viewing order simply due to reputation/recognition.4chan is the chosen home of the chud, and yet its borders are open (unlike reddit which is designed to reinforce group purity)However, 4chan does have features which would allow for poster capital accumulation or at least disparity, but quite significantly users have CHOSEN to punish this sort of behavior with mockery and by refusing to engage in "tripfagging" themselves.That chuds gravitated to a website with no means of purity enforcement or mechanism to place the best first and the worst last, while left leaning or pure left individuals did the opposite is interesting, and I would like a book which might offer insight.
>>24773932You'll eventually find that most right-wingers are very proletarian and most leftists are very capitalistic. It isn't much of a secret. I think what throws a lot of people off is that rightists tend to countersignal against leftist socialism (which tends to be of the progressive bourgeois variety) with apology for capitalism, simply because leftists brand themselves as socialist.I wouldn't doubt it if, in a decade or two, rightists are killing all the billionaires (they're globalist jews!), breaking up the banks (they're woke and plundering the Volk!), exterminating the petit bourgeois academics/leftist managerials (woke, not fellow working class patriots/nationalists), and redistributing land and wealth to the PEOPLE who are not woke, bureaucratic, DEI, etc... In a sense, even DEI reflects the same unearned privilege of nobility. Ironically, the modern (alt) right is essentially communism.
>>24773927>all that for a one word responseSeethe.
>>24773650>Twitter is more racist than 4chan at this point>ThisBeing anon, anyone can just roll their eyes at low effort not funny racism, on Xitter I feel their hatred.
>>24772292>>24772352>>24772407NTA but can you retards seriously not into sarcasm?
>>24774034NTAs but First Post Bait Post.
>>24773873OK, whatever.
>>24773873It is pseudonymous, he's right.
>>24774158>>24774162A username that isn't your real name is anonymous. Simple as.
>>24774162u/throwaway8492 is effectively anonymous.
>>24772290Lmfao
>>24772287they would like to be here but we blow them the fuck out when they cannot control the conversation with self-censorship (arising from reputation systems accounts bring) and tranny mod censorship restricting conversation
>>24774014>"haha, tricked you into explaining how retarded I am!"impressive, very nice
>>24774295>>they would like to be here but we blow them the fuck out>weSpeak for yourself retard. This is not an echo chamber.
>>24774228Really? Check my name, it doesn't say Anonymous.
>>24772287 (OP) I think the implication that right-wingers online are in some sense engaging in behavior contrary to their stated beliefs, namely, support for capitalism, by using a site that prevents accumulation of social capital, is not quite right. It's closer to this: >>24773939 >You'll eventually find that most right-wingers are very proletarian and most leftists are very capitalistic. It'd be more accurate to say that they're often members of different social classes, but I'm not using class in the sense of Marx, which I don't think describes the world well in 2025. "What university did you go to?" is a better model of class than Marx at the moment, funnily enough. Many leftists are members of the professional class, and the fight for these jobs is very close to zero-sum hyper-competition, especially in Academia. Therefore, it's important to avoid anything that could sully your reputation in the eyes of other members of this class at all costs, as there are countless other hungry aspiring PMCs waiting in the wings to take your job and position in the social hierarchy. If you don't take part in social media outrage against target of the week, you are complicit and thus morally suspect.This is a weird cross between the old nobility, who believed themselves to be of a higher type (because of their university's pedigree and the righteousness of their concern for official Victims, a funny contradiction) and the bourgeoisie's hyper-conformism and materialism, taking the worst qualities of both. This could only have come out of the Northeastern United States.
>>24774907i know exactly who you are. your secret’s safe… for now.
>>24772351>artists are in touch with their unconsciousmind == blown
>>24772287Espousing a dead socio-economic model is just another form of attention-seeking. "Look at me, I am so edgy and original."It's so surprise that rep-farmers and other narcissists are also self-styled communists. They also tend to be faggots and trannies too. It's all about posturing.
>>24775002>so surpriseno surprise FFS
>>24774999freudian/jungian infiltration into literature & literary criticism has been disastrous.
