The skeptics have never been refuted and everyone is effectively sticking their heads in the sand or choking on retard tablets whenever they engage in philosoohy sans skepticism.
>>24775193It's not possible to refute a skeptic, but it's easy to show that the skeptic is refuting himself every time he opens his mouth. I don't see what SSRIs have to do with anything. Perhaps you're the one who needs to be on psych meds.
>>24775193>>24775205Religion refutes skepticism. If you can't prove anything, then faith is the only fulfilling answer.
The skeptics make everyone seethe for some reason.
>>24775205The skeptic is not, in fact, refuting himself when he opens his mouth. People who say this are just knuckledraggers who cannot understand the skeptics because they just want to play around in their meaningless conceptual playgrounds that do absolutely nothing but gratify their egoistic desires.
>>24775213That is not a refutation.
>>24775193I'm skeptical of refutations
>>24775219>dogmatic assertion>dogmatic counter-assertionYou don't even know what a skeptic is. You probably read the SEP page about Pyrrho 40 minutes ago and thought he sounded "based".
>>24775229Don't worry, he was only casually asserting those things.
>>24775229Not at all. I am not a skeptic. I justa dmit to their superiority.
>>24775229I was gonna write a funny refutation. albiet, i am a skeptic, though i would say with 99% certainty that behavior and language doesn't require certainty to utilize.
