>>24776029
False premise. The dust has not settled.

File: Gt_kXmJXkAAqAfF.jpg_large.jpg (232 KB, 1080x1529)

232 KB JPG

Master morality incarnate.

File: o4qzet4cgj3c1.jpg (135 KB, 903x1280)

135 KB JPG

>>24776053
Based, we need one for Yemen since their entire military elite and political leadership got ganked and they've been real quite since.

>>24776029
He would be extremely disappointed.

Not with its existence, but with the growing influence of jews on the world, and their insistence on attempting to drag all Masters down to their level.
He makes it explicitly clear, he considers the jews to be chandala.
That he considers abrahamic morality to be Slave Morality.
His most generous compliment to the jews is that they commit to survive, but he clearly preferred the enlightened humanism of Greece and later of Renaissance Europe.

I don't think, at the time of his writing, he would have had a problem with the idea of a jewish state ... but we live in the age of the internet.
If he was able to read about jews, in their own words, to understand them, and what they intend to do, the existential threat they represent to everything he valued, he would have called them for what they are.
A revolt of the chandala that needs to be put down.

He liked jews, did not like nationalism.

>>24776053
>Master morality incarnate.
I think Zionism is more Nietzchean than anything and he apparently had some influence on early Zionist activists. Like the whole transvaluation of values thing and overcoming their own life-denying slave morality and self-hatred. At any rate I read a history of the IDF ("The Sword and the Olive" by the Israeli military historian Martin Van Creveld) which opens with a Nietzsche quote from Thus Sprach Zarathustra. "'What is good? Yes ask. To be brave is good." I don't know what he'd actually think about it though, although it's pretty clear which side is stronger, and Hamas doesn't exactly seem like a life-affirming type of organization.
https://youtu.be/aYM6uV_K7B0
https://youtu.be/cjL0VI2UmMY

>>24776029
He had an opinion on Israel. He advocated for its existence. Idk what he'd think of how it turned out

>>24776366
You are the biggest, most lying retard alive. He literally considered jews to be the most powerful, highest-tier race on the planet and said that Christians only got "saved" through the heckin' awesome supernatural powers of the jews. He said that antisemitism was the biggest cancer on the planet, literally his last letters he wrote after having a stroke and going insane were about abolishing antisemitism. His ideas were never adopted by westerners who saw him as what he really is (a rambling schizo), but they were adopted by the leaders of the Zionist movement and Israel, which Nietszche proudly applauded. Nobody is fooled by your attempt to whitewash Nietszche, he was a kike tool

>Meanwhile, they rather wish and desire, even somewhat importunely, to be insorbed and absorbed by Europe, they long to be finally settled, authorized, and respected somewhere, and wish to put an end to the nomadic life, to the "wandering Jew",—and one should certainly take account of this impulse and tendency, and MAKE ADVANCES to it (it possibly betokens a mitigation of the Jewish instincts) for which purpose it would perhaps be useful and fair to banish the anti-Semitic bawlers out of the country.

>>24776911
The Nazis explicitly adopted Nietzsches ideas, though, it's true they didn't do this with much accuracy.
Saying he was a "kike tool" is an incredible stretch. 90% of his writings were concerned about non Jewish Europeans and their future.
>>24776366
Not entirely accurate. He wasn't that black and white of a thinker. He believed the Jewish religion, genealogically, took on the character of "slave values" following their various losses, particularly after Rome destroyed Judea.
But that within this they also have a strong will toward survival and ensuring their story and identity continue to exist in the world. That their values become represented.
So when he said chandala, he had meant that in Rome, they were the chandala, which they literally were; he did not mean this as an indictment on their character.

>>24776911
I finished re-reading his complete works not but a few months ago.
(You) are the only liar here.

>>24776924
>So when he said chandala, he had meant that in Rome, they were the chandala, which they literally were; he did not mean this as an indictment on their character.
It's not an indictment of character, it's a denotation of caste.
That they commit themselves to their project of resentment, subversion, and destruction of their betters would be Nietzsche's indictment of their character.

>>24776931
Yeah and that's about as gross a mischaracterization of his words as this anon
>>24776911
Had done. Maybe not as gross. But still off base

>>24776924
>The Nazis explicitly adopted Nietzsches ideas, though
After his sister changed them to be nationalistic. His sister probably also being a kike tool since the Nazis have quite a bit of connection to the Rothschilds and other families which wignats don't like to mention
>Saying he was a "kike tool" is an incredible stretch. 90% of his writings were concerned about non Jewish Europeans and their future
He promoted a variant of the kike philosophy. "Morality is a false concept goy! You are a heckin' slave! Just do what you want and remember that only will matters, good and bad are false and gay!" He failed since he literally failed to sell more than fourty copies of any of his books during his later years, but I digress. We see the same kind of philosphy with other kike authors like Ayn Rand and her (((Objectivism))).
>He believed the Jewish religion, genealogically, took on the character of "slave values" following their various losses
False. He believed CHRISTIANS were the supposed "slaves". He said jews were extremely strong and leaders of the new world. He said the same thing of the Mohammedans, outright claiming Spain was BETTER OFF under caliphate rule even though that's the most pathetic lie one can make. He only taught that Christians were weak, and why? Because he also taught that Jesus was one of his supposed "Ubermensch" because he broke Roman law, and he didn't like that people followed Christ's commandments instead of breaking them again. That was literally his whole justification for why Christians are weak.

>>24776934
I'm not sure how you could reach any other conclusion after reading Anti-Christ, but whatever.

>>24776935
Yeah his kike tool sister who married a proto nazi German that started an Aryan colony in south America. Word.

>He promoted a variant of the kike philosophy. "Morality is a false concept goy! You are a heckin' slave! Just do what you want and remember that only will matters, good and bad are false and gay!"
Flat out wrong

>False. He believed CHRISTIANS were the supposed "slaves". He said jews were extremely strong and leaders of the new world. He said the same thing of the Mohammedans, outright claiming Spain was BETTER OFF under caliphate rule even though that's the most pathetic lie one can make. He only taught that Christians were weak, and why? Because he also taught that Jesus was one of his supposed "Ubermensch" because he broke Roman law, and he didn't like that people followed Christ's commandments instead of breaking them again. That was literally his whole justification for why Christians are weak.
Kinda. Sorta. With the Spain thing what he was getting at was they at least kept the roman elements of civilization intact. Which is true. They kept the bath houses running, had paved streets, and gas lamps. One of the first things that was done after the reconquista was shutting down the baths. The point there is for nietzsche, hellenism was "the true European will" and the bath houses that spread all over Europe during pax Romana were a signpost of that. So Christians shutting them down was a very poignant example of all this, for nietzsche.

>>24776943
Where in the antichrist do you get that? I'm not even expressing doubt so much as asking for specific context. I remember a lot of that book but it's been a long time.

File: gtqt2pg5v8381.png (510 KB, 1440x1665)

510 KB PNG

>>24776931
Who's resentful and who's overcoming?

>>24776951
It is explicitly clear in Anti-Christ he considers Abrahamic morality to be Slave Morality.

>In my “Genealogy of Morals” I give the first psychological explanation
of the concepts underlying those two antithetical things, a noble
morality and a ressentiment morality, the second of which is a mere
product of the denial of the former. The Judaeo-Christian moral system
belongs to the second division, and in every detail. In order to be able
to say Nay to everything representing an ascending evolution of life—
that is, to well-being, to power, to beauty, to self-approval—the
instincts of ressentiment, here become downright genius, had to invent
an other world in which the acceptance of life appeared as the most
evil and abominable thing imaginable. Psychologically, the Jews are a
people gifted with the very strongest vitality, so much so that when
they found themselves facing impossible conditions of life they chose
voluntarily, and with a profound talent for self-preservation, the side of
all those instincts which make for décadence—not as if mastered by
them, but as if detecting in them a power by which “the world” could
be defied.
>The Jews are the very opposite of décadents: they have simply been
forced into appearing in that guise, and with a degree of skill
approaching the non plus ultra of histrionic genius they have managed
to put themselves at the head of all décadent movements (—for
example, the Christianity of Paul—), and so make of them something
stronger than any party frankly saying Yes to life. To the sort of men
who reach out for power under Judaism and Christianity,—that is to
say, to the priestly class—décadence is no more than a means to an
end. Men of this sort have a vital interest in making mankind sick, and
in confusing the values of “good” and “bad,” “true” and “false” in a
manner that is not only dangerous to life, but also slanders it.

File: jewishicon3.jpg (77 KB, 850x400)

77 KB JPG

>>24776949
>his kike tool sister who married a proto nazi German that started an Aryan colony in south America
Right, Nazis are soooo antisemitic. That's why Hitler got backing from the Rothschilds, safely transported thousands of jews to Israel via the Havara Agreement while massacring whites throughout the rest of WWII, and then allowed Israel as a country to exist by letting his country take the blame. Sure.
>Flat out wrong
Flat out right. That is literal kike philosphy and what Nietszche promoted. It's also what most Nietszcheans (or really edgy teens, cause that's what they are) really want. That "might makes right" attitude, that desire to impose yourself over others because of your lack of confidence. Much like Israel does, taking from Nietszche as many Zionists have outright stated they are inspired by the man
>With the Spain thing what he was getting at was they at least kept the roman elements of civilization intact
Bull. Fucking. Shit.
>They kept the bath houses running, had paved streets, and gas lamps
Facades, fake appearances of "civility" when they murdered tons of innocent civilians, destroyed actual scientific progress Christians were doing, imposed their barbarous laws over Spain. Saracens are not "civilized", they are brutes
>One of the first things that was done after the reconquista was shutting down the baths
Because Spain was reeling from the damage the Muslims had made and had to start rebuilding society from the ground up. This meant some sacrifices.
>hellenism was "the true European will"
Then he'd be surprised that Aristotle and his fellow philosphers not only believed in moral standards of extremely similar nature to the Christian faith, and indeed Church Fathers used them as a base alongside the Commandments, but they'd mock Nietszche's ridiculous and delirious conceptions of reality. And really, you know this isn't why he actually likes Islam. He likes Islam because, much like judaism, it is about imposing one's will over others. Muslims are well known for that. Nietszche, being the psycho he was, respects that far more than the peaceful nature of the Christian faith.

>>24776953
(You)

>>24776962
But you see this as a quotation that demonstrates he believed jews were

"commit[ing] themselves to their project of resentment, subversion, and destruction of their betters?"

Because this passage is about how the Jews were forced into a position of needing to adopt apparently decadent values just to maintain power; the subtext there is that they were ghettoized by feudal Christian Europe for thousands of years and that this, within that context, is how they maintained themselves and acquired power.

>>24776963
>Then he'd be surprised that Aristotle and his fellow philosphers not only believed in moral standards of extremely similar nature to the Christian faith
Aristotle believed in slavery as a natural essential quality of people which directly transgresses the Christian faith.

>>24776985
Indeed, not everything was one-to-one, I never claimed that. Christianity changed many things. However, compared to what Nietzsche promoted, Aristotle is way closer to Christianity.

>>24776988
He was also a pedophile. Aristotle.

I'm gonna say nietzsche was closer.

>>24776982
Are you even *capable* of reading?

>To the sort of men
who reach out for power under Judaism and Christianity,—that is to
say, to the priestly class—décadence is no more than a means to an
end. Men of this sort have a vital interest in making mankind sick, and
in confusing the values of “good” and “bad,” “true” and “false” in a
manner that is not only dangerous to life, but also slanders it.
He is asserting that the priests of abrahamic values are against
>an ascending evolution of life—
that is, to well-being, to power, to beauty, to self-approval

He is asserting that the priests of abrahamist values are themselves sick, and, out of resentment, make a business of making others sick.
I am growing tired and have little interesting in continuing this conversation with half-wits.
You can read Anti-Christ yourself.

But frankly, you don't need to read Anti-Christ to understand this.
It is self evident.

File: nietzsche_pedo.png (99 KB, 1858x290)

99 KB PNG

>>24776994
...That isn't a particularly flattering picture of Friedrich, though it certainly IS one consistent with what he thought.

>>24776996
Can you?

>Psychologically, the Jews are a
people gifted with the very strongest vitality, so much so that when
they found themselves facing impossible conditions of life they chose
voluntarily, and with a profound talent for self-preservation, the side of
all those instincts which make for décadence—not as if mastered by
them, but as if detecting in them a power by which “the world” could
be defied.
>The Jews are the very opposite of décadents: they have simply been
forced into appearing in that guise, and with a degree of skill
approaching the non plus ultra of histrionic genius they have managed
to put themselves at the head of all décadent movements (—for
example, the Christianity of Paul—), and so make of them something
stronger than any party frankly saying Yes to life.

>>24776998
NTA
But it certainly *is* true that encountering something more beautiful than oneself forces the noble soul into contemplation and towards the complexity of wisdom.
The ignoble soul reacts with resentment.

>>24776998
The first two quotes are genealogical.

The last one is admittedly pretty gay.

>>24776996
>I am growing tired and have little interesting in continuing this conversation with half-wits.
>You can read Anti-Christ yourself.

Lmao

>>24777003
You cannot read.
The following passage

>The history of Israel is invaluable as a typical history of an attempt to
denaturize all natural values: I point to five facts which bear this out.
Originally, and above all in the time of the monarchy, Israel maintained
the right attitude of things, which is to say, the natural attitude. Its
Jahveh was an expression of its consciousness of power, its joy in itself,
its hopes for itself: to him the Jews looked for victory and salvation and
through him they expected nature to give them whatever was
necessary to their existence—above all, rain. Jahveh is the god of Israel,
and consequently the god of justice: this is the logic of every race that
has power in its hands and a good conscience in the use of it. In the
religious ceremonial of the Jews both aspects of this self-approval stand
revealed. The nation is grateful for the high destiny that has enabled it
to obtain dominion; it is grateful for the benign procession of the
seasons, and for the good fortune attending its herds and its crops.—
This view of things remained an ideal for a long while, even after it had
been robbed of validity by tragic blows: anarchy within and the
Assyrian without.
>But the people still retained, as a projection of their highest yearnings,
that vision of a king who was at once a gallant warrior and an upright
judge—a vision best visualized in the typical prophet (i. e., critic and
satirist of the moment), Isaiah.—But every hope remained unfulfilled.
The old god no longer could do what he used to do. He ought to have
been abandoned. But what actually happened? Simply this: the
conception of him was changed—the conception of him was
denaturized; this was the price that had to be paid for keeping him.—
Jahveh, the god of “justice”—he is in accord with Israel no more, he no
longer vizualizes the national egoism; he is now a god only
conditionally....
>The public notion of this god now becomes merely a weapon in the
hands of clerical agitators, who interpret all happiness as a reward and
all unhappiness as a punishment for obedience or disobedience to him,
for “sin”: that most fraudulent of all imaginable interpretations,
whereby a “moral order of the world” is set up, and the fundamental
concepts, “cause” and “effect,” are stood on their heads. Once natural
causation has been swept out of the world by doctrines of reward and
punishment some sort of un-natural causation becomes necessary: and
all other varieties of the denial of nature follow it. A god who
demands—in place of a god who helps, who gives counsel, who is at
bottom merely a name for every happy inspiration of courage and self-
reliance.... Morality is no longer a reflection of the conditions which
make for the sound life and development of the people; it is no longer
the primary life-instinct; instead it has become abstract and in
opposition to life—a fundamental perversion of the fancy, an “evil eye”
on all things.

>>24777008
But he does agree with the first two making him mega gay and a diddler.

>>24777011
Yes I have read this before.
So did you read the other parts of the antichrist where he's talking about how the modern jews use these values tactically because they do have a sense of themselves as a people with a will, whereas the Christian Europeans don't do this because they've turned into resentful creatures concerned with destroying their own civilization?

>>24777017
Where is there agreement? There is genealogical analysis. I don't see an agreement

>>24777018
Yes.
And regardless, to OP's question, Nietzsche would have a serious problem both with the knuckledragging modern christians, and with jews who have promoted their inversion of all good values with profound force in the age of communication.

>>24777023
Ok. Just making sure. I was getting tired of arguing with half wits.

>>24777029
>I did actually read it
>o-ok, I was just making sure

I say this as a Priest myself, as someone who spent many years of my life studying and practicing both Judaism and Christianity

Abrahamic morality is a threat to life.

Nietzsche was opposed to self-deception. Modern Israelis are self-deceiving, to maintain their image of being the only bastion of so-called Judeo-Christian values in the Middle East they rationalise their extraordinarily high civilian kill rate as necessary to self-defence, that their very existence is on the line and that any demurring about overreach demonstrates a lack of concern for the safety of the most unfairly criticised nation in the world. They cloak their will to power in moral pretension. European Jews gab on about “coming home” when they move to Israel, but find themselves so at odds with the environment and their neighbours that they have to antagonise everyone around them. Nietzsche also hoped that Jewish culture could be mingled in with European culture to create “the good European”, and would have seen the Jewish capitulation to nationalism as a shame.

Is Nietzsche discussion sort of like the Starship Troopers movie fandom where both the left and right have extremely shallow critiques of the work in question while the people who are actually interested in learning get crowded out and pushed to the wayside?

>Nietzsche also hoped that Jewish culture could be mingled in with European culture to create “the good European”
why do we take this cripple seriously again?

>>24777153
>Nietzsche also hoped that Jewish culture could be mingled in with European culture to create “the good European”
I'll put some friction to this.
I think he wanted Europeans to become morally sophisticated, not necessarily "good" (depending on how you mean it), and regain their will to survive.
But I don't see this at all as Nietzsche promoting Jewish culture, more that he was trying to save European culture...

>>24777167
I think you could also say very few people are capable of bearing what Nietzsche actually meant.

>>24777167
wtf are you learning from Starship Troopers?

>>24777186
>"Damn, fascism is really cool..."

>>24776040
fpbp. The dust always turns to shit-flinging in N. threads. This will be no exception.

Having said this, wasn't it Cioran via Nietzsche that said that the Jews were the protagonists of World History?

>>24777189
You either die a hero...

>>24777193
Or become a goy.
Many such cases.

>>24777339
Well no the quote ends "...or live long enough to see yourself become the villain"
But jews have been rotten from the start.
There is no way to spin a culture centered around mutilating male children as anything other completely wrong on every level.

You say "or become a goy" like it wouldn't be an improvement on a jew's quality of life.

>>24776029
Jews have resorted to outright misanthropy in their desire to survive as an identity. Zionism is the extremest expression of nationalism (i.e. conformism) we've seen since Nazism.

Question: What would Nietzsche have done if he was alive in 1930's Germany?
Answer: He would probably scratch at his coffin

I don't get why people try to argue whether or not Nietzsche would've supported some particular ideology. Isn't one of his main ideas that concepts are created for the survival and power of those who develop them? Wouldn't it stand to reason that different individuals would develop different, and even mutually opposed concepts due to having different strategies of affecting the world?

>>24776911
Begone, vile rabbi

It would be difficult to imagine him having much nice to say about them, considering that even as they obliterate their enemies they bitch and moan and cry about how unfair everything is and how everybody has to feel bad for them all the time. Deeply neurotic race of people.

>>24777381
>There is no way to spin a culture centered around mutilating male children
Im much more opposed to the autistic strictures to specific arbitrary religious laws rather than the baby mutilation per se. Who cares if little jimmy gets of in 5 seconds instead of 3 'cus his bell is a bit shriveled, its more that they follow the commands of a jealous deity rather than intrinsic truths.

OFC there is something respectable in the sear stick-to-itiveness that the whole system inspires, but even then I find the transition in Jesus's stuff to a more fundemental and internal entity more compelling. Not necissarily christian stuff per se since I think that devolves the purity of jesus to a sort of groveling.

>>24780148
>Who cares if little jimmy gets of in 5 seconds
instead of 3 'cus his bell is a bit shriveled
NTA
The Overman would care.
As a victim of this practice I have become very painfully aware of how deeply it is fucking everything up.
The problem is not limited to the vicitms, it extends to everyone who has to live with the victims, and put up with their warped psychology.
An Overman would be able to tell the jews who are committed to this insanity to stop hurting themselves, both for their sake, and for everyone else.

>OFC there is something respectable in the sear stick-to-itiveness that the whole system inspires
No, there is something deeply deeply horrifying about it.
It's institutionalized sexual sadism directed at children.
In any good and just society the practice would be illegal.

Frankly, I hope you die tonight.

File: Israel IQ in 2024.jpg (142 KB, 1131x837)

142 KB JPG

He would look at the Israeli's taking gibs and milking off of others and go to calling them the parasites of all parasites.

File: Israel IQ in 2022.jpg (263 KB, 1282x892)

263 KB JPG

He may even lament that they aren't even capable of fighting wars, but rather attacking women and children is the death knell of Israel as a result of that being the final expression of their military capacity.

File: classic jew face.gif (2.69 MB, 480x270)

2.69 MB GIF

>>24776029
he'd 100% be shabbos goy.
who could deny the jews collective will-to-power of their values?
truly the ubermench people...

>>24780409
The jews don't have will to power.
They only have a will to live in pointless neurotic agony, and to drag everyone down with them into their brand of hell.

I feel like Nietzsche is more interesting if you treat him as this guy intellectually fighting to the death with modernity rather than this spiritual guru whose every word you are supposed to hang on to like your life depended on it. It's less what he says about things that is interesting and more the questions he asks. Like reading Nietzsche should be more about "what do I think about this issue he brings up in work X or Y" and less "let me see what I should think about this issue according to this great Polish philosopher".

>>24780419
That is a solid summation.

>>24780148
the whole thing about a jealous God was most likely to hammer the point that there's just one external and objective reality. that also answers some questions about why sometimes the Jews are defeated because God allowed that an enemy tribe should defeat them, because the point is is that reality will do what it does, and whatever happens happens outside of your control, because reality is larger than you are, and everyone and everything is at the mercy of it.

>>24780432
He's more mystic than philosopher and his entire method is instigation, which also happens to be his purpose. He says things about Poles and jews to get Germans riled up. At certain points you have to understand he's periphrastically antagonizing Germans into action. If you want to see what the moderate mystic might look like, that would be Friedrich Hoelderlin.

>>24780419
Wow. you had me fooled.
I mean they got the whole world to sit down while they got to genocide their perceived enemies. Not China or Russia or Iran or anyone is really stopping them; hell the US paradoxically aids them both eagerly/reluctantly them like some kinda compelled schizoid golem... like a slave.
Yeah. I don't think your argument holds water against perceived reality. Their will is sovereign globally and the fact we can't admit this openly is testament to their power.

>>24780446
>I mean they got the whole world to sit down
...Did you not see the UN walk out on him? Did you not see everyone from Spain to North Korea send aid to the Gazan natives? Israel was an Anglo project from the very beginning. The Anglo is clearly pulling the strings, using the jews to break the power of possible caliphates from building up.

>>24776953
The European is shown on the right side and the Semitic is on the left side for the last one, you should correct and reverse

>>24780446
Will to Power is far more than the mere will to conquer one's perceived enemies.
You are the Last Man.

>>24780461
The UN is powerless. I've known that since childhood; it takes place in New York City which itself is under rule of an of an occupied government. How someone can deny ZOG at this point is beyond the pale of reason and just delusional/hasbara.
The reality is that Israel could nuke Iran right now and no one would stop them or retaliate.
This is an exceptional value among the universal values: the jews are the exception.
This is the core of Nichaenism and seemingly fuels these exceptional "value creations" exclusive to themselves.
They are crafting their own apotheosis and want us to worship them as gods: a gestalt ubermensch/messianic people who enforce their values on goyim/slaves.

>>24780475
Don't talk to me like you know me or know my thinking.
I'm just an internet entity to you.
For all you know, I'm a chatbot as you are to me:
a perceived lower resolution being.
Say something worthy that makes me question my ontological standing; otherwise don't waste my time.

What was it about the Kali Yuga ... and wicked men in charge...?

>>24780494
I will address you as the Last Man that you are.

>>24780496
Why?
Because I didn't string together words in the exact syntax that suited you?
You inferred all this from one post about me?
Or are you bluffing with knowledge & wisdom you clearly don't have in hand.

>>24780486
>it takes place in New York City which itself is under rule of an of an occupied government
So some freaks hang up some string so they can buy groceries on Saturday. That's just proof that they don't take their religion seriously.
>The reality is that Israel could nuke Iran right now and no one would stop them or retaliate.
If they could have, they would have. Netanyahu stays on his leash. When Obama, or Trump, or whoever tugs- the prime minister of Israel sits like a good little boy.
>They are crafting their own apotheosis and want us to worship them as gods
Supremacism by delusion is more akin to the story Repairer of Reputations, where the feebleminded mentally ill character puts on a crown of brass and imagines it is made of gold and embedded with jewels in his own mind, than anything resembling actual generative growth. If Israel were stable it would not rely on the US for everything from economic aid to military engagement and even security training. Neo-rabbinicalists are basically helpless without us but keep wearing their ridiculous brass crown which is embarrassing for us because we know they belong in the asylum.

>>24780499
Because you are a Last Man.

>>24780502
I guess that's it.
End of discussion.

File: 5mw71okmban71.jpg (47 KB, 410x600)

47 KB JPG

>>24780506
Indeed.

>>24780512
is that Shadow from FF6?

>>24780523
It's Amano, but I couldn't tell you.

>>24780393
>As a victim of this practice I have become very painfully aware of how deeply it is fucking everything up.
>The problem is not limited to the vicitms, it extends to everyone who has to live with the victims, and put up with their warped psychology.
Think you are over reacting. Im cut too.
>The Overman would care.
I dont think he would all that much. It practically does nothing. The overman would find it a petty minor worldly offering to do away with, not a grievous offence. Maybe im more desensitized to it then most cause Im familar with all the weird foreskin things anchient peoples did. Like the greeks having a little knot to tie their forskin off because showing your bell end was considered indecent.

>>24780442
Far enough. though I think its more an element of Jeudisms pagan past. with a more emotional, animal, and terbulent god

File: egon schiele.jpg (534 KB, 1066x1104)

534 KB JPG

>>24780532
yeah could tell.
always felt he got a lot off egon shaal...

>>24776029
He'd be their biggest advocate, and would be a frequent pundit on Hannity were he alive today.

>>24780533
One day you'll see things my way.

File: sad bolton.jpg (45 KB, 636x424)

45 KB JPG

>>24780535
he would be a neocon wouldn't he...

>>24780546
Definitely. He'd jizz his pants over what Jews have accomplished in the 20th century, and beg for the West to emulate every facet of their culture.

He'd also be very confused as to why the Americans didn't nuke the entire world into submission in the 50s, and bring that up every 5 minutes as an example of Western Christian weakness.

>>24780626
Nietzsche never made that argument and he had the chance to.

>>24780546
Just the opposite. Nietzsche claimed to be a Pole and praised jews when it was convenient. He did so because he was expressly attempting to instigate Germans to be a certain way. If he saw what was happening in Gaza and Ukraine, he would praise the Palestinians and claim to be a Ukrainian, and instigate from the position of strategic weakness.

>>24780627
He had a chance to speak on the 20th century? Wow!

>>24780626
>He'd also be very confused as to why the Americans didn't nuke the entire world into submission in the 50s, and bring that up every 5 minutes as an example of Western Christian weakness.
yeah real "life affirming" guy; he'd kill everyone for petty godhood inside a material prison

>>24780632
Nietzsche is a jew in spirit.