[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1.34 MB, 667x1000)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB PNG
its "The Book of Enoch" but with several advantages:
>rewritten in plain modern english
>take the confusing vague parts and rewrite them to clearly say the most popular interpretation instead
>add parts that arent strictly in the original book of enoch but come from surrounding texts and add them to the story, because they are, they're just scattered across other texts. to create a coherent narrative
>be willing to be a little inaccurate for the sake of creating a more appealing read
>give it a really appealing and aesthetic cover
>add AI illustrations here and there
think i can sell this?
>>
>>24776253
Norman Mailer already did that with the gospels.
It's shit. Funny regardless seeing the bad christfag reviews pile up, despite literally repeating their own shit back at them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.