How many times did you get a boner while reading lolita
>>24788651I- I'm not... not gonna be answering that, dude
>>24788651Zero?
>>24788651Last time this happened to me was when I was reading 1001 Nights, where the guy fucked 40 girls.
>>24788651only once, and near the beginning when he licks both her eyes because she got something in one of them. good scene and really adds to the book
>>24788651zero but I'm not sure if it's because my dick is numb from porn or not
>>24788665This.Lolita has a good premise but terrible execution
>>24788651None. It's intentionally vulgar."Ada" however got me good. Particularly the part with the shaking bottle. I feel something of a connection with Nabokov because that infernal demon haunted my nightmares long before I saw her represented as a character in a novel.
>>24788665spbp>>24788774it was probably made to troll womenthey'll believe anything
was too busy admiring the pristine prose to be aroused by whatever was happening in the story
>>24789066>not reading purely to admire the endless river of letters set in a beautiful typefacengmi
>>24788774What is the premise? I've never looked into what this book actually is
I don't think I was ever aroused by this book, it isn't really smut. The average LN has more.
>>24788651Impossible to fap to. A boring, boring book. Dull. Droll. Too long. It insists on itself. Nabokov's ego glares at me from every page, demanding validation, expecting praise, begging for attention.
>>24789414>Impossible to fap to. A boring, boring book. Dull. Droll. Too long. It insists on itself. Nabokov's ego glares at me from every page, demanding validation, expecting praise, begging for attention.Please elaborate on your entire point. I want to hear more of what you have to say, and no this is not sarcasm. Please reply.
>>24789414Complaints about prominent authors’ egos are veiled insecurities stemming from the complainer’s own lack of praise
>>24789430yikes, you kinda burned him
>>24789183>not taking LSD and admiring the patterns the letters on the pages makeYou'll never be a writer.>>24789430He's correct, though.Nabokov's prose wants you to pay attention to it. It purposefully forces you to admire it, making a stumbling and stuttering experience out of reading.Joyce's prose, on the other hand, is as flowing and subtly beautiful as water.
