Why don't you read Artaud, Bataille, Sade and Genet?
coomer slop
>>24790136Because I don't read petulant frogs. The French seem super astroturfed here.
Genet's gay physiognomy disgusts me to my core.
>>24790142>The French seem super astroturfed hereAre you new? To this board? To this world? To literature? French literature is the most critically acclaimed one in every place but here. Most people here read a few books and never read anything from it again. You seem more people complaining about the French than about the contents of the books they wrote.
not a tranny, sorry
>>24790142everything french is like that. they're the most overrated of the races, at least in Europe but perhaps the world. their art, their language, their food, its all lousy at best. (their music is okay.) It appeals to intellectual, academic types because its so decadent and indulgent. really the only good frog is a belgian, and even they are inferior dutchmen (themselves, inferior Germans)
>>24790160I'm not new i just hate frogs
>>24790160To be fair, most people are dumb as rocks and deserve excruciation
>>24790136I read Artaud, and studied him in school. Been planning to read Bataille for some time now. And I'm unsure whether I would like Genet. On one hand, I enjoy stories about degenerate criminals, on the other his politics were pretty cringe.
>>24790136The goon squad
>>24790167you're just a pussy afraid of transgression
>>24790142>>24790213Imagine thinking you know about literature but excluding the country which had the most influence on the medium because/pol/ told you frog bad.Absolute brainlets.
>>24790136Refer to pornhub
>>24790136Lautréamont should be in it instead of Sade
>>24790628ackshually Rabelais, Lautréamont, Artaud and Genet are the goats of French prose. forget Sade and Bataille (the former is merely a historical curiosity, the latter is best doing theoretical work)
>>24790136Aren't these guys sexual deviants?
>>24790722Fucking prostitutes doesn't make you a sexual deviant
>>24790136>tfw Bataille caused Peter Thiel
>>24790752
>>24790283BEEP BEEP
>>24790519I don't use /pol/
>>24790762how? did he say he read him? I cannot imagine how you would read Bataille and be on that antichrist crap, unless he's fashioning a personal myth about himself lioe Bataille did.
>>24790976he's probably thinking of some influence Bataille had on Girard, who was Thiel's professor and is often mentioned by his midwit pupil
