Why hasn’t a woman written a masterpiece? Nothing they have written can really be compared to Joyce or Shakespeare or Cervantes. I always chuckle when holes try to compare Middlemarch to Paradise Lost as if they are even in the same ballpark.
>>24792874Charlie Bone was dope and a woman wrote it
>>24792874Have you ever met a woman? If you have the first thing that stands out about their character is that they're incredibly dumb.
There are more women who have read Jane Austen than have read Cervantes. For all the posturing by men about pretentious shit like James Joyce and intertextuality, the reality is that most men don't read because they're too busy playing video games and the majority of men who do read probably read to impress women. If you're one of the very few men who read for your own pleasure you're probably not the kind to be seething about how much better men are at reading than women, so fuck off and go play Anime Titty Games 4, faggot.
>>24792893>reee you’re an incel gamerYou can tell a hole wrote this post because it doesn’t engage with the OP at all.
>>24792874They have written masterpieces. Just nothing Joyce-level.
>>24792874Middlemarch is a masterpiece, shithead
>>24792874is Kristin Lavransdatter a masterpiece? I havent read it but she got a nobel prize and whatever country shes from put her on their money, most importantly she was very cute when she was young
>>24792896They're so dumb bro.
>>24792900You've never read Genji.
>>24792896It's a fact that women read much more than men. Saying that women haven't written a classic is stupid because it's the minority of men who do read congratulating an even smaller minority of men who write on their awesome man writing. Meanwhile, women are reading and writing books are a much greater rate. I don't think you're capable of even understanding this point because you're a cumbrain retard.
>>24792874>Why hasn’t a woman written a masterpiece?Tolstoy was a woman.
>>24792916Toots, you need to get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich. Tell me what living female author you’re referring to that wrote anything close to Mason and Dixon?
>>24792916>Meanwhile, women are reading and writing books are a much greaterYeah but they're all dumb.
>>24792916how come women were writing all these books back in the day but nobody is still talking about any of them, why do they lack staying power?
>>24792924Mason and Dixon is shit and Thomas Pynchon is woke, faggot.
>>24792934They're dumb. Women don't want to engage with this point because they're just smart enough to know they can't win.
>>24792937Extra mayo on the sandwich hon
>>24792934What are you on about? There's loads of study that happens about historic female authors in academia. Do you just mean they aren't one of the 4 male authors that get spammed on /lit/ constantly? lmfao
>>24792937>Thomas Pynchon is wokebased
men: what if I rendered into iambic pentameter a poem about the timeless struggle of good vs evilwomen: what if a billionaire werewolf pirate kept an average looking personalityless woman as a sex slave and even though he could have any women he chose her and he violently raped her but in a good way
>>24792943There’s loads of academic studies on African authors too. Doesn’t mean they have written anything close to a masterpiece. DEI universities have to do that anyways or the communist governors will cut their funding.
>>24792874Pride and Prejudice is widely considered a masterpiece. If your criteria for masterpiece is "Shakespeare", then Joyce or Cervantes haven't written one either. If it's just your personal opinion, it's as worthless as the ones you attempt to ridicule.
>>24792950If your definition of a masterpiece is ''I like it'' and you only like things that were written are based and redpilled according to your definition, yeah, obviously no woman has written a masterpiece, but you're a faggot gamer cumbrain and nobody cares. It doesn't change that women write and read as well as attempt academia at a higher rate than men do. All you have is stubbornness that asserts men are the best like a 12 year old boy in a playground. All the facts are against you.
>>24792964>attempt academiaNice Freudian slip. I’m sure plenty of women attempt to write things, sounds like we both know they aren’t successful which is why you can’t point to anything worthwhile written by a woman ever, let alone the past 50 years.
>>24792957the only masterpieces in world literature are hamlet and faust
>>24792969>says women can't engage with the point>doesn't engage with the pointah yes, a tranny cumbrain
>>24792916>It's a fact that women read much more than menWomen read mostly porn; they're porn addicts. https://youtu.be/ffvRhsViyIQ>writing books are a much greater rateProse quality is at an all time low. https://youtu.be/8ynCVmw5AWk
The male vs female IQ distribution samples not only serve as a representation of the fundamental difference between men and women, but also as a reliable analogy for pretty much every single field of human thought and skill.Women always occupy the middle ground of being acceptably competent.Men occupy the extremes. They are more often than not either absolutely terrible, or exceptionally brilliant at everything.A woman can be good at something, but she will never reach the ranks of a 0.1% male at the top of his craft.There will never be a female Tolstoy. There will never be a female Edward Witten.
>>24792943>There's loads of study that happens about historic female authors in academiaESL or just retarded?
>>24792980There will also never be a woman who makes threads as shit as this one.
>>24792976>tranny cumbrain Are you mad that George Eliot was a repressed trans man and the greatest literary work a “woman” has ever written still required a touch of the male?
>>24792874>Why hasn’t a woman written a masterpiece?The one who wrote Legacy of Kain.
>>24792976Lol
>>24792987Are you assuming OP's gender?
>Why hasn’t a woman written a masterpiece?
>>24792899Virginia Woolf is better than Joyce
>>24793000>>24793001>hive mind
>>24793000>>24793001The world needs god, desperately.
>>24793003The retardation is spreading. We must lock down the thread.
>>24792995Yes, the OP is a tranny who hates women because he was born a male and to excuse his own mediocrity he bashes them, wishing he was born a woman so his failures as a man wouldn't be so bad.
>>24792980>A woman can be good at something, but she will never reach the ranks of a 0.1% male at the top of his craft. There will never be a female Tolstoy. There will never be a female Edward WittenYeah, men were destined for greatness or shame. Women were destined for mediocrity
>>24793017source on the bloom pic?
>>24793017>>24793028Fags are gross and without oppression the 0.00001% who could produce art are too busy spreading parasites on grinder.
The problem with women - besides being dumb, which they continue to refuse to engage with, by the way - is that they are completely opposed to truth. Their nature and everything they do is centered around lies and deception.
>>24792980Middlemarch is better than Anna Karenina
>>24793001No, she wasn't. In fact, she was seething about Joyce so bad to the point she started making racist remarks about him being Irish.
>>24792970Both supremely overrated
>>24793003>>24793005>>24793008>>24793064none of you have read her.
>>24792980I see no reason to believe that literary skill is analogous to mathematical problem solving. If your argument were correct then we should expect those with the highest IQs to be the best writers and vice versa but there's little evidence of that.
>>24793083that's because being good at math requires autistic dedication to it to the detriment of everything else
>>24793047The First Circle mogs both.
There is the whole IQ bell curve argument (men being the most retarded and the most genius), but I don't think that gets to the heart of things. On a sociological level, they are also less incentivized towards greatness i.e. a “great woman" is not valued as much as a "great man". But this still lacks explanatory power. Women are overly socialized. They are by nature communalistic and consensus-driven. This means that originality is much less likely from a woman. And even the great works written by women (Middlemarch, Virginia Woolf’s works, Jane Austen) are more or less derivative. They are good students, but usually that is all. This is also partly why MFA literature is dominated by women. The most talented women will go to all the right institutions, incorporate all the "right" technique, but never innovate beyond this, nor think critically about the world in a truly original way. Their philosophy is always mediated and tempered by what consensus and broader society tells them it should be, by nature of their sex, which possesses a weaker and more cowardly spirit. As a result, women lack true individuality, and therefore their work lacks the originality of perspective required of greatness. Beyond this, women are fundamentally carnal creatures. Men have a carnal side as well, but they also possess a duality inside them (spirit and body), and have the ability to suppress their carnality in favor of a higher ideal. By contrast, women in their being are ruled by their emotions and sexuality, and therefore lack a true sense of morality, therefore possessing a fundamentally Jewish character. Women cannot know Platonic love, only the fleeting feeling of romantic love. They cannot know the love of an absolute ideal, which is a crucial component of genius.
>>24793094>therefore possessing a fundamentally Jewish characterYou lost me here chief
>>24793094>therefore possessing a fundamentally Jewish characterYou gave away the satire too easily there bro.
Women don't have the intelligence to be great writers like William Faulkner, George Eliot, or Charles Dickens.
>>24793083>literary skill is analogous to mathematical problem solvingI didn't say that. I said the IQ distribution differences between the sexes are analogous to other fields of human knowledge and skill. Women occupy the middle ground, men occupy the extremes.
>>24793114>george eliotTotally not a tranny and definitely a real woman btw
>>24793126>ugly women don't exist! it's all men!
>>24793126By the way, you know that whole theory about how historical portrait painters would portray their subjects as far more attractive than they really are?Her wikipedia page confirms this theory as unequivocally, undeniably true.Look at the fucking difference between her portrait and her photograph.
>>24793126>>24793133That's a man
>>24793126looks like your typical angloid woman
>>24793139nah, just an average english rose. you know the joke about why the english became good sailors? it's all true
>>24793128He has a 5 oclock shadow and prominent Adam’s apple lol what is this cope and trans erasure
>>24792874Ayn Rand is probably the closest, though calling anything that she wrote "a masterpiece" is a bit of a stretch
can't believe no one ITT has mentioned Mary Shelley yetyou retards don't actually read lmao
>>24793171We are talking about masterpieces not 3rd rate mediocrity. What has she written that compares to Ulysses?
>>24793171Everybody knows Percy wrote Frankenstein.
>>24793179Mary Shelley essentially invented science fiction by writing Frankensteinyou haven't read Ulysses all the way through, so please stop malding about it
>>24793186No, he didn't. He was the editor.
>>24793198Sure, if you think editing means rewriting the entire book to not be about getting raped by an inhuman monster.
>>24793028https://youtu.be/VcZbZ36qh4U?si=hE77Fr9sYLYCe1xm>>24793040You're talking about party-gays, who oftentimes are traumatized by religious fanatics
>>24793193As much as Aldiss is a great writer I despise him for introducing this faggot notion to the world
>>24792874Nice tits
>>24792874read woolf retard
>>24793064>racist remarks>about him being IrishLmao
>>24793486That dogface bitch Virginia Woof was just Leonard in drag prove me wrong (you can't)
>>24792906Norwegian.Coincidentally, the aunt of Rollo and Gorm the Old of Denmark (Gorm = alias of Tore "Teiande" of Norway, Rollos brother) is the only known female author of the OG surviving Norse sagas.
>>24792950>communist governorsyou just might be the most retarded person in the entire thread.
>>24793565Hey, he's not a woman.
>>24793565How do you think the CCP is organized
>>24793568what does the CCP have to do with amerikan universities?
>>24793571>he doesn’t know
>>24793574lol. but still china has absolutely nothing to do with communism. its just as capitalistic as amerika
>>24792916>It's a fact that women read much more than men.They read porn. For their vagina tingles. That's like bragging that men are better film enjoyers because they watch porn, or consume more visual art because they read hentai manga.
>>24793575>real communism has never been triedOh boy...
>>24793577that's a complete non sequitur lmao. china was socialist up to '76. maybe actually read something before making retarded posts.
>>24793581Here we go again...
>>24793595Wrong one
>>24793186This.>>24793198There's a guy who spent decades studying Frankenstein. Originally he aggressively defended against any idea Percy had a major role in writing the book but he came around like 20 years ago and begrudgingly admitted Percy's contributions were substantial.
>>24793595"Not real communism" faggots are the most intellectually stunted midwits imaginable. They make people with TDS look smart by comparison.
>>24793604and what does that have to do with chinese revisionism?
>>24792874>picMemes aside, IQ is not a real factor in the strength of a novelist, being too intelligent can even be a hindrance. And a masterpiece is anything the majority believes it to be, therefore there have been many masterpieces written by women. Who cares anyway, art is about expression and soul, not autistic comptetition.
>>24793619
>>24793633again, what does this have to do with the current day revisionism of the CCP? I get that you haven't read Marx, let alone Mao, but still...
>>24793614Not that guy but it's true the US has been actively sabotaging attempts at communism since the 50s, Korea, Vietnam, Venezuela, Cuba. The only countries who haven't been successfully bullied into capitalist submission have been countries with nukes like China and North Korea.Side tangent: get nukes and keep them. If Ukraine didn't forfeit their nuclear weapons in a deal with the US they wouldn't be in their current mess. Mutually assurred destruction is the only thing that keeps imperialist niggers in line.
>>24793639
>>24793645read marx, not wikipedia...
>>24793647>right back to real communism has never been triedWikipedia is full of Marxist editors, but surely they and all communist countries are wrong and you are right.
>>24793654not everyone who proclaims themselves marxist is marxist, you retard. do you even know what revisionism means? fucking hell, what has lit turned into...
>>24793660>no true scotsmanOf coouuuuurrrssseeee. Naturally where this was going.
>>24793666oh well. my fault for expecting a mutt to understand anything.
>>24793669Non-sequitor.
>fallacy andybrown
>>24793683He would break his hand if he tried to punch me with that
>>24792874Where did she get those
>>24793643>These poor innocent communist totalitarian dictatorships were just going about their own business building utopias and the mean old USA ruined everything! Fuck you people are retards.
Middlemarch is pretty good op
>>24793720Salvador Allende, notorious dictator.
>>24792874Blackpill: most books “written” by men were written by their wives and just published by the men. Most males are functionally illiterate for deep-seated neurological reasons.
>>24793762Get a load of this hole
>>24792874Read Willa Cather
>>24793736Seeing as the commies in his coalition wanted to take over parliament and establish a dictatorship I'd say he was nipped in the bud. >NOOOOOO, THE SOCIALIST UTOPIA IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER THIS TIME I SWEARFuck off, retard.
>>24792874why hasn’t an ovum ever outrun a sperm cell? woman is the form everything moves toward. there would be no masterpieces if there weren’t any women either. all true poetry is matriarchal in origin. the most venerated poem in the west, the iliad, starts off ‘sing to me, o goddess.’
>>24793576For example, the current NYT bestseller is yet another tome of romantasy slop. This one is about a girl kidnapped, imprisoned, and raped by a necromancer until she develops stockholm syndrome and falls in love with him.The publishing industry is just a bunch of female authors and readers gooning to 600+ page rape fantasies.
>>24792874you must be new like new new this has been a flannery o'connor board since forever
>>24793720history is written by the victors indeed
>>24793762Impossible, a woman would never be so selfless and generous to a man.
>>24793908>my entire understanding of history can be expressed by a clicheYep. You guys are retards.
>>24793911>maybe if i say retard over and over people will think I'm correctretard
>>24793912The rationale for calling you a retard was in the greentext, retard.
>>24793935You are fat and brown, retard.
>>24793939>can't think of an original insult and has to go with brown/fatLol, retard.
>>24792893I love women don't get me wrong, but I think objectively speaking they are far, far more likely to only read contemporary fiction. The literary canon consists almost entirely of male authors so naturally they feel alienated. In consequence they are less inclined to read works of fiction that are aesthetically, philosophically edifying, that are so good that they continue to be relevant and enjoyed by readers generation after generation. This to me seems like a fairly uncontroversial observation.
>>24792874Too busy getting their tits sucked by (You)r trully.
>>24792874you almost had me there
>>24793942sez u, retard
>>24792893This anon is right
>>24793945Maybe if you self select for readers first. Male readers are more likely to read the canon because men are generally more interested in being impressive, building their resume, etc. Not saying all canon readers are like this, but a good many are. Men are so unlikely to read though that your average woman is more likely to read classics than your average man, especially if you include stuff like Austen and the Brontes.
>>24793608Kek, I asked my Romantics professor about this once and he instantly knew who I was talking about. He said the sperg goes to every conference and submits to every magazine trying to convince all the others, but they mainly ignore his schizo ramblings. My professor said that the common belief is that Percy probably helped edit the book, but it was largely written by Mary
>>24792874A woman wrote the most popular and influential series of novels ever. More people enjoy Rowling than Joyce and Shakespeare and Cervantes combined. Popularity is the only true measure of objective quality. Anything else is appeal to authority cope.
>>24792893I don't think men read to impress women. I think they read to impress other men. Stuff like the /lit/ 100 is basically just a way of keeping score.
>>24794345>Popularity is the only true measure of objective quality. >Anything else is appeal to authority cope.That's literally an appeal to authority cope.
>>24794345Have you read James Whitcomb Riley?
>>24793094>t. Otto Anoninger
>>24793000Literally the most overrated writer in the history of writing. A spoiled, self-centered retard.
>>24793081I've read To the Lighthouse, Orlando, The Waves, and Between the Acts. The only one I thought was overrated was Orlando but it had its moments.
>>24794344Cool but the guy was widely respected until he said Percy had contributed substantially to Frankenstein and he still minimizes it as much as he can. Either you're lying, your professor is retarded, or it's a different guy.
>>24794424I've had this exact conversation on this website before, and I remember taking away that you might just be that guy. If that's the case, they're never gonna invest in your ramblings bro
>>24794431>I've made the same appeal to authority and been called out by multiple anons Sucks to be you.
>>24793608who’s the guy
>>24794454Can't remember. He published an edition of Frankenstein around 2010 that highlighted Percy's contributions and feminists had a meltie.
>>24794476not charles e robinson? he never said percy’s contributions were ‘substantial.’ he said his role was that of literary editor and stylistic advisor, not a co-writer.
>>24794440No shot. Are the the anon that goes from thread to thread pointing out the sama fallacy incorrectly, too? Holy shit, how many conversations have we had? Also kek at you claiming appeal to authority when the initial argument was based on some scholar spend "decades" studying to come to some conclusion and that was the only evidence provided. This board man
>>24794483If that's all he said the fact that saying it set off a shit storm of seethe should clue you in to embedded biases, anon. >>24794487>pointing out the sama fallacy incorrectly, tooAgain, not me. You need to take a break from this website, bud. >Also kek at you claiming appeal to authorityI noticed I should have said "anecdotal appeal to authority" right after I posted but I didn't think you'd be enough of a faggot to cry about it. Get a life, bro.
>>24794513the fact that you’ve apparently cited this story a few times but never cared to remember the scholar’s name is telling. starting to wonder you really care about evidence or some personal agenda.
>>24794522>the fact that you’ve apparently cited this story a few timesWhat the fuck are you talking about? Are you samefagging or something? >never cared to remember the scholar’s nameI'm posting on 4chan. I'm not writing an essay on the authorship or Frankenstein you pretentious pseud. >tellingAh, you were setting up a "no you". Lol. >starting to wonder you really care about evidence or some personal agendaYou're projecting an awful lot to the point it's pretty creepy. This is probably why you've been friendzoned by every girl you've ever been attracted to, if they even let you get that close, despite the fact you anonymously defend Mary Shelley's reputation as if you're an esteemed expert. Again: get a life.
They keep laughing at me and won't take me seriously.
>>24794539You should go after girls like the sneaky link one. She isn't the prettiest of the bunch but she gives off pick me vibes and the hair flip indicates she's probably has some moves.
Women just don't live the same lives men do. There was a point over the last century where a great female work was possible because women were not being as gamed by modernity as they now are, so they could actually hone their skill decently. Now, women are encouraged to be incredibly stupid, anxious, etc. But men are too. It's just awful
>>24794513>the autistic greentext point-by-point reply to an at-arms-length putdownwhy are you lashing out eh?just saying you didn’t remember dates or names - it shines a light on whether you’re interested in facts at all.
>>24794569>why are you lashing out eh?I'm making fun of you for being a fag who's carrying around arguments he's had on this website. >just saying you didn’t remember dates or namesSo? Do you expect everyone to be as dishonest as you obviously are and consult Wikipedia in order to gain your level of pseudery? >it shines a light on whether you’re interested in facts Not really but this conversation sure "shines a light" on the fact you're a disingenuous fag who lives online.
>>24794579anyone who’s interested enough to question the authorship of a novel, i probably would expect to check, yeah.i’m sure this won’t get far with someone as fighting-mad as you but this is my first time talking about frankenstein on this website. a lot of ad hominem for someone who recently cried appeal to authority fallacy.
>>24794589>y-you didn't know a name and a dateAnd you looked it up on Wikipedia in order to feign intelligence. >people who make fun of me are just madAwwww, did your mom tell you that to help you cope with the bullying? How long did it take them to realize you were never going to have a social life anyway so they might as well home school you? Lol.
>>24793017>Yeah, men were destined for greatness or shame. Women were destined for mediocrityWhy are so many men just mediocre then?
>>24794631take a mental step back and reread our interaction. would like to see an otherwise sensible person say it’s me who’s upset.>You’re projecting an awful lot> help you cope with the bullying? How long did it take them to realize you were never going to have a social life anyway so they might as well home school you?you couldn’t write it.
>>24794538>projecting>This is probably why you've been friendzoned by every girl you've ever been attracted to
>>24794641From only a few posts I was able to tell you're a retarded loser who lives his life online. The first clue was your admission that you carry around arguments you've had with random anons as if they're life events. The second clue was the obvious samefagging. The third clue was your pretense that we're writing research essays and not simply posting online. The fourth clue was your continued attempt to disingenuously shift from the subject of conversation to hold on to a gotcha that isn't actually a gotcha. So yes, anon. In only a few short posts anyone can tell you're a retarded loser who lives his life online and that your primary source of self-esteem is imagining you're winning arguments with strangers who are actually laughing at you.
>>24792874Lady Murasaki's "Genji Monogatari" is considered a masterpiece.>>24792906I think so. It is criminally underrated. Undset is IMO the best Catholic author of the last century.
>>24794673Kek, you're replying to multiple people, one of them me
>>24794673this is my first replyi did see that other anon accuse you of being some other anon. but you’re also playing that same card here, aren’t you?
>>24794686Yeah, don't believe you and even if I'm wrong about the samefagging there's still the other points. >>24794688Yeah,still don't believe you. All indications point to you being the type of loser who would use his phone and a computer to pretend to be 2 different people.
>>24794695did you stop to think that this would just make you look stupider to me if it wasn’t true?either way my point was you’re guilty of the exact same charge you’re pushing
>>24794720>did you stop to think that this would just make you look stupider to me if it wasn’t trueI figured you'd probably get hung up on it and I could make fun of you either way, lol. Also: other points. Doesn't really make a difference if I'm mocking 2 retards or just one.
Women are vapid whores
>>24794726am i hung up? feel like i’ve been pulling punches. & is it that fun if you don’t take into account the other persons angle though? i only thought you were a regular 4chan chud but now it looks more like i’m talking to a bona fide diagnosed autist.
>>24794735>am i hung up?Definitely. Like I said, I figured you'd get really hung up on being called a samefag. You turned a trivial conversation about Frankenstein into a weird pseudo-debate that only served to prove you're both an idiot and a loser.
>>24794743can you point to where i did that exactly?
>>24794751>exactly?Lol, fag.
>>24794761and that is that.
>>24794764I already pointed out to you, anon. You're an idiot and you post like a fag. Simple as.
>>24794766omg, both of you stfu
>>24794790who tf is this guy now
Interesting thread ruined by two redditors trying to out retard each other.
>>24794886very interesting thread. never been done before i’d say.
>>24794633Because the tails are still smaller than the average??? Are you a woman?
>>24793047She was a fairly masculine woman
>>24792893they hated them because they spoke the truth
>>24794539>>24794551For me it has always been 5'3" and an attitude.
>>24792874booba
>>24793000She was a nasty classist
