[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Name a bigger failure. Go on, I'll wait.
>>
>>24795522
He killed himself because he realized his books sucked.
>>
>>24795529
Yes.
>>
literature as a whole.
>>
>>24795537
this fag never read Hemingway
>>
>>24795522
When did DFW ever use the phrase "New Sincerity"?
>>
>>24795522
I don't take advice from dudes who topped themselves
>>
>>24795539
>Hemingway
>good
this fag never read Hemingway
>>
>>24795545
>hemingway
>bad
this fag never read Hilary Mantel
>>
>>24795541
man shut the fuck up
>>
>>24795556
>Hilary Mantel
looked like Gollum
>>
>>24795622
>he bases the literary gods on their visual appearance
embarrassing
>>
>>24795648
people who don't make the effort to try to look good are just self-centered. Why would I care what some narcissist thinks?
>>
>>24795788
lmao
>>
>>24795788
>people who don't make the effort to try to look good are just self-centered
mishima bros keep winning
>>
>>24795522
He literally said it would be a failure.

>The next real literary "rebels" in this country might well emerge as some weird bunch of "anti-rebels," born oglers who dare to back away from ironic watching, who have the childish gall to actually endorse single-entendre values. Who treat old untrendy human troubles and emotions in U.S. life with reverence and conviction. Who eschew self-consciousness and fatigue. These anti-rebels would be outdated, of course, before they even started. Too sincere. Clearly repressed. Backward, quaint, naive, anachronistic. Maybe that'll be the point, why they'll be the next real rebels. Real rebels, as far as I can see, risk things. Risk disapproval. The old postmodern insurgents risked the gasp and squeal: shock, disgust, outrage, censorship, accusations of socialism, anarchism, nihilism. The new rebels might be the ones willing to risk the yawn, the rolled eyes, the cool smile, the nudged ribs, the parody of gifted ironists, the "How banal." Accusations of sentimentality, melodrama. Credulity. Willingness to be suckered by a world of lurkers and starers who fear gaze and ridicule above imprisonment without law. Who knows.
>>
>>24796191
so sitcom writers
>>
>Name a bigger failure

My marriage
My band
My literary career
My education
My last job
My health
My battle with mental illness
My battle with substance abuse
My life as a whole, really



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.