Controversy aside, it's not even a good readMost of it is just drawn out rambling and boring stories from Hitler's life
>>24795561Well he explains why he's not a fan of Jews fairly well in this
most right-wing drivel is vapid emotional appeal dressed as "common truths"poppycock!
>>24795641Hitler was a socialist, tho?
I like the part where the Nazi party starts out as an underground revolutionary movement, that had a kinda cool political thriller atmosphere. All of the rest is impossibly boring.
>>24795649No he wasn't you stupid faggot
>>24795676National.... Socialist
>>24795676>>24795649It's more complicated than that
>>24795676>>24795686Not really. After WWII ended and left a vacuum where traditional political authority used to be ideologies arose revolving around different theories of socialism. >b-but I like socialism and Nazis are badTime to grow up and see the world for what it is and was. The Nazis had several policies that would make the modern left jizz in their pants if enacted by their favored ideological overlords.
>>24795676In general, Americans can't comprehend what doesn't fit neatly into their modern two-party system
>>24795641Whereas leftism is analytical and scrutinizing?
>>24795641what is a woman?
>>24795641>>24795803what the fuck even is left-wing and right-wing any more? >>24795807a miserable pile of secrets
>>24795641>poppycock!Go back.
>>24795822where? back to ed edd n eddy?
>>24795827>where?Newfag.
>>24795561Is this book the namesake of Meinkraft
>>24795822The election tourist cries out in pain as he strikes you.
>>24795561Only volume one. Volume two is a blast (if you like political theory). But you're probably a fag who doesn't know there are two volumes.
I like how he literally talks about gassing Jews in it and then holocaust deniers are like "who'd even come up with such a thing?!" I mean obviously the guy who implemented Aktion T4 but holocaust deniers don't know anything about that either.
>>24795561I don't agree, actually. The angry and passionate tone keeps in engaging as prose IMO, even though the whole nature of the work is that he's talking about lots of practical/political/cultural stuff.>>24795995Although Volume I seems to be biography and Volume II seems to be party stuff, in fact these two major themes (Hitler's autobiography and Nazi party formulation) straddle both volumes fairly evenly. Toward the back of Volume II he details how they would rent out progressively larger halls to spread their message, and how eventually took control as the main orator, knew exactly how to read a room and adjust his speech in real time, etc. This is at the same time an autobiographical triumph, him boasting about how good he was as a public speaker (which is true, any honest history of oratory includes him as one of the most effective in history, alongside Martin Luther King, to diverge wildly), while at the same time giving concrete history of the party development independently of himself. But he himself pervades the work, since it's his own vision of what the party is and ought to be.
>>24795561What Rothschild was ever a good writer
I dislike how 99.9% of retarded virgin misfit wannabe-natsocs (who would have been put to death as unfit by the real National Socialist party) so conveniently forget that Adolf's dislike of jews rose about because of their frequent associations with marxism, the actual enterprise that he viewed as adversarial, not the other way around.
>>24796706You are jewish, we get it
>>24796286>Source: Wartime OSS propaganda
>>24796151>source: i made it up.
>>24795561I guess the personal stories would be fascinating to a neo naziThe fact they come from a time where the nazi party was a bottom up movement that seemed to have everything stacked against them when fighting the reds will be relatable and invigorating to them
>>24795561>Start reading Mein Kampf expecting an antisemitic pamphlet >it’s actually Hitler’s autobiography >says he wants to be a painter/architect instead of working for the state’s administration like his family desire>mfw I’m literally in the same position>am I literally Hitler?
>>24795808>what the fuck even is left-wing and right-wing any more?Left-wing belief is that we can create a better future for all peoples. Right-wing belief is that we need to punish those we dislike and keep more for ourselves even though there's no need.
>>24797085Shalom
>>24797466>>>left-wing belief is that we can create a better future for all peoples, except for those who face the wall or end up in gulag.
>>24797533I also agree that billionaires should be lined up against the wall and shot.
>>24797533So you don't believe in punishing criminals or what? The hypocrisy of rightoids talking about "oh no my gulags" and then posting "billions must die" the next second.
>>24797542but here's the thing: only a handful of people will realistically get to participate in the lynching of elon musk, so you and 99.9% of your comrades will have to satisfy your bloodlust by murdering your neighbor for the crime of living in a nicer house. a better future for those who don't inspire your envy (everyone inspires your envy).>>24797567there is no contradiction there. communism simply inverts basic values, labeling as criminals the best of humanity - the talented, the principled, the hard-working - while elevating the murderer and the rapist. remember when your idols were executing people for daring to own a few hectares of family farmland, because that's "vampirism"? even as beria the rapist pedophile was picking out child victims from his limo? that's the essence of communism.
>>24797466the right-wing belief is that humanity will always be inherently unequal. the left-wing belief is that humanity can be made equal through the culling of the superior.
>>24797611>remember when your idols were executing people for daring to own a few hectares of family farmland, because that's "vampirism"? even as beria the rapist pedophile was picking out child victims from his limo? that's the essence of communism.I'm not a Leninist or a Stalinist lmao
>>24797533>GulagYou're one of those, I see.The Marxists were funded by westerners. Statist bankers, Fabians probably, saw the potential of Marxism to ruin the chances of revolution, as it was that gradualist perversion of intent of all power to the people. >>24797611You, you mean you. You're the one with the bloodlust. You are thoroughly inured in capitalist propaganda. "Communism" is communities taking charge of their lives, not your elites. You have read nothing but liberal hit pieces. Did you even know you're a liberal?
>>24797640i don't care.
>>24797652>You have read nothing but liberal hit pieces.i have lived in literal, actually existing communism. go drown in a river you fucking rat.
>>24797622>the right-wing belief is that humanity will always be inherently unequal.The rightwing is always about siding with the controllers, the kings, the popes, the whoever it is that took power. It is rooted in Christo-Romantic slavery/servantry.>>24797663And now you don't read my post as short as it is.I'll repeat. The Fabians/socdems ushered in the Bolsheviks to crush the revolution. The Bolshies called their party "Communist", but like the Democratic party in the US they did not stand for communism, they claimed that would come later after the whole world fell to their totalitarianism.All nonsense and both sides loved that idiots like you fell for the ruse and repeat their lies.What was the USSR? What any other authoritarian state is. That is NOT what the term was for. AGAIN, that term is COMMUNITY. Only a direct democracy can organize that. You lived in a LIE, you fucking idiot rat.
>>24797090>If at the beginning of the war and during the war twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain. Mein Kampf page 766, Stalag Edition, Ostara Publications
>>24795808>what the fuck even is left-wing and right-wing any more?Depends. The terms are reasonable shorthand for political groups and tribes, but the terms are frequently overused and abused.The terms originate from the French Revolution where the Right was the aristocracy and the Left were the revolutionaries. While this revolutionary left espoused liberal ideals, in reality they were still brutal authoritarians more intent on purging Aristocracy and Christianity than implementing a tolerant liberal society. When The Left gained power, they implemented a political Reign of Terror, executing thousands of people.So, they haven't really meant anything concrete for a very long time. Although perhaps not coincidentally, the modern far left still resembles the violent authoritarians of the french revolution, even though they're usually more overtly communist or socialist.
>>24797676>The rightwing is always about siding with the controllers, the kings, the popes, the whoever it is that took power.Not really."The right" is always different, and generally comprises whatever the violent bloodthirsty left is trying to destroy.In present day, they're trying to destroy White European civilization.
>>24797611>communism simply inverts basic values, labeling as criminals the best of humanity - the talented, the principled, the hard-working - while elevating the murderer and the rapistIs this nigga serious?
>>24798054>In present day, they're trying to destroy White European civilization.If modern "White European civilization" represents nothing but the current unfettered ultra capitalist hellscape we've all come to despise then why not destroy it?
>>24798054Yes, really. The term for political "right" was of course from those Frenchmen. The right are those who are pro-monarchy, while the political left was just some tepid liberal shit looking for a constitutional monarchy. *less* centralized control. See?The left want bodily autonomy, they want freedom from the state. Back in the day they simply got up and left to avoid the taxes, the protection racket of the kings/emperor, the filthy cities and the periodic plagues they bred, (breath in that scent of Civilization! *piss and shit*) the conscriptions of your children to die in war of expansion. "Oh, I wanna state mandated wiafu! Bring serfdom back, Mr Yarvin!"Hey, you can't be serious if you don't know damn well this "rightwing" is just as bloodthirsty. Is this not you? You like freedom and democracy? Well you aren't really rightwing then.Wipe the terms away. Wipe out and look, actually LOOK at what people stand for. It is freedom versus control. Now absolute freedom, like a wild animal or some idiotic anarcho-primitivism is not desirable, but don't knee jerk it all the way back to the Control side. Because that is even worse. Fucking North Korea, East Berlin back in the day. That's Control, OBVIOUSLY, and labeling it "leftwing" is a fucking psyops. >White EuropeanThat too is the psyops that breeds your dumbasses so that you beg them for ethnic cleansing and tight fucking boarders and a absolute police state. That's more you? You are on the side of Control. A broken automaton, barely a man, not even human. Just a tool.
>>24797791Mein Kampf: Confessions of a Killer. The new translation (2025)
>>24795561same as unabomber ranting about libtards
>>24798189>the political left was just some tepid liberal shit looking for a constitutional monarchy. *less* centralized control.That's so cool. So what happened to that beautiful movement when they got to power?
>>24798325Lame comparison. Ted was MKultra'ed by the elites that Hitler was from and served their purposes. Ted wasn't at all successful with all these banks backing him like Hitler was.
>>24798472They were resisted by the royals who used to kill them. Are you gonna try and make us cry for the poor innocent aristocrats? "Some of them lost their lives!" And?
>>24798503But treated the general population well, correct? Only pushed for more freedoms?
>>24798512As the middle merchant class they had always thought of themselves as the superiors (some of them scheming Freemasons) and did as they do now, they used the lower classes to secure their power. As Napoleon would also do. He just played a different tune and got even more people killed. It was around this time that the "lower class" Frenchman Proudhon came to a mostly logical conclusion about all those bastards.
