Post a book you refuse to read but you're not allowed to say why.
>>24798879
>>24798879Missing out of some prime cooming material.
>>24798879I would read it again. What's more interesting about it is that it was published more as a collection of his novel as it was mid-edit, combined with changes spurred by his notes. So if anything, it's like reading an autopsy of a work in progress. I liked that a whole lot. Some parts of it were sacrilegious and I didn't so much care for them, but if you want to be a writer it's worth looking at simply for the sake of seeing something in the throes of its creation.
>>24798928Wish I could find and sue the retards on this board that wasted my time with this crap
>>24798916Good luck. Everyone who likes this guy seems so obnoxious + I'm so sick of hearing about him.
>>24798941Good pick*+ adding my contribution
>>24798945>refusing to read a book because you have an e-grudge against the translatorwow. just wow.
>>24798879All book awards are political, so that book must be a piece of shit, and I'm not reading it
>>24798955Blow me, max.
>>24798879All of Henry James.
>>24798918Isn't it worst that half the popes in the last 100 years covered up child molestation or were faggots?
>>24798941I read 100 pages of the first book. Second rate memoir and tenth rate philosophy.
