Are any of his works worth reading?
>>24802168Yea, but his public debates are more entertaining applications of his works in action.
You're good with youtube videos
>>24802168If you're 14 and it's 2008.
Hitchens would have gone absolutely mad at Trump’s presidency. Goddamn cancer made us miss out on his undoubtedly lulzy commentary about Trump. Imagine how Hitchens would react to Trump becoming buddies with Kim Jong Un. KEK
>>24802168>Marxist turned neo-conNo.
>>24802168
>>24802957tale as old as time
>>24802957The Trotskyist to neo-con pipeline is real.
>>24802168Arguably is pretty great
>>24802168>hitchens>worth reading
>>24802448He wouldn’t have spared Biden’s gerontocracy either, especially the attempts at coverups. Remember what he wrote about the Clintons. I wish we’d seen it because there were no good voices laying the hammer down on that bullshit before the debate that swung public sentiment. They barely showed the man in public for his entire presidency. Oh well. Lots of people need skewering. Especially now with the illiberal attacks on the founding principles.
>>24802448>made us miss outWe've been drowning in TDS content for a decade now.
>>24802168Sure. But if the subjects don't grab you, you can skip any of them.Better to read Vidal
