[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1753724672209159.png (639 KB, 642x800)
639 KB
639 KB PNG
Do enjambments belong in heroic couplet? Doesn't it go against the whole point?
>>
>>24802389
Obviously it cannot be used as commonly as in blank verse but I think most poets use enjambment in heroic couplets. Otherwise it would be too sing-song and unnecessarily restrict the possibilities of speech.
>>
File: George_Chapman.jpg (103 KB, 768x850)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>24802389
Chapman uses them all the time to impart momentum to the narrative, and it works brilliantly.
In fact, couplets can sound rather twee after a while without something to shake them up.
>>
>>24802961
Chapman didn't write "heroic couplets", which are, be definition, unenjambed. He wrote what were called "riding rhymes".
>>
>>24803063
>Chapman didn't write "heroic couplets", which are, be definition, unenjambed.
Wow I didn't know Pope didn't write heroic couplets.
>>
>>24802389
>Doesn't it go against the whole point?
in the 17th/18thC heroic couplet verse i've read they love to stylishly deploy the occasional three-line rhyme or line of iambic hexameter, and the same goes for enjambment



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.