It's a shame the west had that whole anti-gay period, because we were denied our own version of the great mirror of male love. The west has a huge lacking in gay stuff from the early modern period because of the old superstitions.What do you think it would have been like?
>>24823577What is that book about dont make me google it please
>>24823583The title explains the book.
>>24823583It has stories with titles like "Though Bearing an Umbrella, he was Rained Upon"
if u into that there's a book called "passions of the cut sleeve" or some shit about gay culture in imperial chinese history u might dig it
>>24823577Anti-(male)homosexuality is Jewish.
>>24823593I mean yeah all the foreign abrahamic religions were kind of what killed it in the west (which is only now recovering)
>>24823577Nanshoku okagami is fun. I guess we have pic related
>>24823577Every story in this book concerns young boys. The type of homosexuality written about in this book is still abhorred in the West.
>>24823606i always imagined socrates as a much older man, ilke a grandpa. was he actually a daddy?
>>24823577I don't necessarily agree
>>24823606>In thys place seemeth to be some sauour of disorderly loue, which the learned call paederastice: but it is gathered beside his meaning. For who that hath red Plato his dialogue called Alcybiades, Xenophon and Maximus Tyrius of Socrates opinions, may easily perceiue, that such loue is muche to be alowed and liked of, specially so meant, as Socrates vsed it: who sayth, that in deede he loued Alcybiades extremely, yet not Alcybiades person, but hys soule, which is Alcybiades owne selfe. And so is paederastice much to be praeferred before gynerastice, that is the loue whiche enflameth men with lust toward woman kind. But yet let no man thinke, that herein I stand with Lucian or hys deuelish disciple Vnico Aretino, in defence of execrable and horrible sinnes of forbidden and vnlawful fleshlinesse. VVhose abominable errour is fully confuted of Perionius, and others.
>>24823577go back to /lgbt/ you disgusting pedo no one gives a fuck about your degeneracy here
>>24823593>>24823595Abrahamism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
>>24823854I think he was pretty old
>>24824456t. christcuck, kike or goatfucker
>>24823593Based Jews.
>>24824461At least recovery has begun
>>24823593>Anti-gay is Jewish>No gay is Jewish>No anti-gay is JewishWhen will people finally accept the reality of the Jews being scapegoated for everything?
>>24825285It's simple. The jews hate male sexuality because it's a bond they can't subvert. Also they've spent thousands of years looking at circumcised dicks
>>24825285It is very strange
>>24825285>mfw scapegoating is literally a Jewish practice
>>24824456okay philo
>>24823593It is Hebrew, and it is also Germanic. If you have a problem with anti-(male)homosexuality, I suggest you take it up with the nearest peatbog. (Proditores et transfugas arboribus suspendunt, ignavos et imbelles et corpore infames caeno ac palude, iniecta insuper crate, mergunt.)>>24823595Homosexuality was only tolerated before Christianity fixed Romes because Rome had fallen at that time, like the West has fallen today. Based Christianity fixed Rome.>>24823607Homosexuals fantasize about abusing boys? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked!
>>24826667>Homosexuality was only tolerated before Christianity fixed Romes because Rome had fallen at that timeThis is false, as right-wing philosopher Hans Blüher (pbuh) points out:>One has to realize that the decline of the Greeks and the emergence of samesex love did not temporally coincide. Precisely the opposite occurred: The decline and disapprobation of this so highly cultivated love-directionality played out simultaneously with the decline of Hellas as a historical phenomenon.
>>24823577tolerance of homo perversity preceeded the collapse of every civilization since the beginning of time
>>24823577gays do much better work in the closethttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XOB5syfDOB0
>>24826679Where do one's start with Bluher?
>>24826667>I suggest you take it up with the nearest peatbogThere isn't enough context to conclude that corpores infames would have referred to homosexuals, and if it would, it would only refer to passive homosexuals. Romans similarly despised passive homosexuals, yet had no issue with a man having sex with a boy from a lower social class. At least one account suggests that Germanic people had a reputation for homosexuality:>For example, amongst us sex with males is regarded as shameful or rather illegal, but by the Germani, they say, it is not looked upon as shameful but as a customary thing.— Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism>Homosexuality was only tolerated before Christianity fixed Romes because Rome had fallen at that timeHomosexuality was more common and accepted when Rome was at its peak, and gradually fell out of favour as Rome declined.
>>24827181faggot curiosly doesn't addres the pedo shit. shocked!
>>24827205curiously* address* typed too fast haha :)
>>24826999Jew
>>24826999It's the opposite actually
>>24823593>pro homosex Its da Jooz>anti-homosexIts da jooz. You niggers are retarded.
>>24823588Golden shower?
>>24826999>Life preceded the death of every individual since the beginning of time
