It’s Over.
>>24824221Lol
lmaowhat is the first word even?
The bottom 80% of the IQ curve has always been this retarded, you just didnt have the internet to see it 24/7 and they weren't able to collectively rouse each other into new heights of tardfroth
>>24825695I think it's a cartoon worm.
>merriam-websterI see they still haven't retracted their 'offensive' definition of 'preference' and apologized for the brazen, deranged agenda-pushing that it represents
>>24825712The public education system has failed and is continually failing everyone.
>>24825896It's mostly a lack of discipline. People should be hammered into shape by heavy boots and they should have no say over what shape they're being stamped into.
>>24824221When you see that it’s always political bullshit, and that this is constantly on the people’s mind, and you think about the fact that 20th/21st century mass society exists to turn all these billions into political retards and little else, and you think about the fact that directly instead of indirectly programmable bodies will soon be here… well it really gets them gears a turnin don’t it dad?
>>24825731(You) are a cartoon worm.
>>24825712Being retarded doesn't automatically mean you have to speak like niggers. Glorifying retardation is definitely a modern phenomenon.
Where is 6-7
>>24825860actual bizarro world>you can revoke consent anytime for any reason>but also it's bad to suggest people can prefer one thing over another in a sexual context
>>24826998>revoke consent any time for any reason Yes anon that's how consenting to things works, provided no contract is involved. If you don't want to finish your cake, you can revoke the decision to eat said cake. If you consent to letting your friend cut your hair and change your mind halfway through, you can revoke the decision to let said friend cut your hair. You of course can't sue said friend for giving you half a haircut, but noone short of coddled feelgood liberals and neurotic trauma victims has ever actually called for that.>it's bad to suggest people can prefer one thing over another in a sexual contextNow if you look very closely you'll note it says "orientation" as a big blue link, which implies that merriam webster holds that conflating anothers sexual orientation with a preference is offensive. Which is arguably very contextual of course, but I'm sure if a sufficently condescending faggot mentioned "your preferences" in passing you'd see how it can come off as somewhat diminishing in a similar vein to calling it "lifestyle choices", no? Not quite the same as "suggesting people can prefer one thing over another" in any case. (Mind you it's still an odd defintion for the article to contain, preference much like proclivity is sort of beating about the bush, but hardly universally considered offensive. Reeks of HR sensitivity training if you ask me.)>TLDRGetting filtered by the concept of consent and a merriam webster definiton is pretty brutal. Reconsider how your emotions affect your literacy, you can be hard right without being a retard.
>>24827084>Now if you look very closely you'll note it says "orientation" as a big blue link, which implies that merriam webster holds that conflating anothers sexual orientation with a preference is offensive.Who the fuck actually cares though? So sick of these language games. NTA
>>24827084I don't have a problem with the consent bit, the idea is that it has to do with preferences and so contradicts the second thing.>if someone mentioned my "preferences" it would come off as diminishingNot at all. I'll happily say I prefer to do this, I prefer not to do that. Only a very insecure person would suggest that the word "preferences" is diminishing. Aversion to that word suggests something undesirable about preferring one option over another.
>>24827084If you expressed consent to the cake, ate the cake, and 20 years later made a public accusation of having been forcefed cake by an evil baker trying to poison you, that would be analogous to what’s currently happening with “consent”.
>>24827096>Who the fuck actually cares though?Obnoxious activist retards that receive no pushback.
