[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1761403235146978.png (66 KB, 236x256)
66 KB
66 KB PNG
>look at a random book on my shelf I've read a couple of years ago
>realize I barely remember what happens in it
Is this normal?
>>
>>24828653
apparently for this board it is
>>
>>24828653
>is a normal memory normal
>>
>>24828653
Yes.

Read a summary of the book on Wikipedia or wherever, you probably remember more than you think. Just need something to trigger those memories.
>>
that's what you get for reading "classics"
>>
>>24828653
this is what happens when you're a friendless loser that doesn't talk to others about what you're reading. you need related memories to fix the book in your head for good, like "i read my favorite passage to an arthoe and she gave me head"
>>
>>24828653
I think not remembering exact details and nuances is normal, and i've definitely noticed it happening faster with collections of short stories or plays, but if you completely forget the entire outline that is a little concerning. Read slower perhaps. Reading is not about quantity.
>>
>>24828653
haha OP I love froggo XD



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.