[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5659.jpg (674 KB, 1536x2048)
674 KB
674 KB JPG
>bestseller that set the standards for poetry at the height of British Empire
>completely forgotten today
Was it shit?
>>
>>24829205
i'd guess not. Our society is just stupid and thinks history doesn't matter unless its supports the emotional wants of the mob in the moment.
>>
>>24829205
not as good as the Golden Treasury
>>
>>24829574
It succeeded it though
>>
>>24829205
>>completely forgotten today
Plenty of the poems in there are remembered. Unfortunately, 99% of poetry is absolute dreck, so even a "good" collection will have quite a bit of chaff.
>>
>>24829205
?
The Oxford Book of English Verse is continually revised and sells incredibly well.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.