Where should a westerner looking to follow the tenets of Confucianism start? Should I just dive right in and read the Analects?
You wouldn’t understand if you started from there. Begin with Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy by van Norden. Then Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy by the same guy.
>>24829655Why?
>>24829528try suicide
>>24829528Ezra Pound's translations and writings.
>>24829657nta but the raw text presupposes a certain kind of reader, and since you're most likely not chinese and living in 500BC there's large amounts of context you'd be missing that a secondary text can provide
>>24829528It starts with honoring your parents through filial piety and parental love to your children. All else flows from this
>>24829528Yes read the text. So many gatekeeping retards around here. It's a simple text. Short. Start by being polite to everyone as if they were a family member.
>>24829528The Analects: An Illustrated EditionISBN: 9780691179759
>>24829528Remember, anon, books are like a finger pointing to the moon...
>>24829528>Where should a westerner looking to follow the tenets of Confucianism start? Should I just dive right in and read the Analects?Panda Express sells fortune cookies in bulk.
>>24829528>Should I just dive right in and read the Analects?Yeah. Then afterwards go for Mencius and then Xunzi. Philip Ivanhoe wrote some neat scholarly material if you're still keen to go deeper. Or you can just continue with neoconfucianism
Imagine wanting to think like a chinaman
>>24829528Mencius is the pinnacle