Is this good?
Yes
embrace retard mode
bump
Silly ideas from a silly man.
>>24834701I have an idea. Go on twitter or Goodreads, and look at the faces in the avatars of people who positively review the work. Consider if you'd like to be associated with them.
>>24834703what's wrong with them
evola strikes me as somewhat homosexual
>>24834703let's see the faces of the people who negatively review the book, starting with you
>>24834615That depends. Do you want to unravel the secrets of the cosmos and embrace your destiny as an aristocrat of the soul? Or do you want to have a chance at getting a girlfriend? Choose wisely, retard.
>>24834615>this, in book form.
nahstay away from evola
>>24834703I wanted to, then I actually interacted with them and found they were mostly worse than Redditors in terms of spiritual decadence and general immaturity. Also most of them claim they don’t facedox because it’s about the content but really it’s because they’re gay, brown, or Jewish (sometimes all three).
>>24834615No one actually reads Evola so just say you read it and make stuff up.
>>24834615Has a lot of good ideas, but ultimately misguided when he talks about appropriating buddhism to fit a hindoo warrior caste ideal (as if the dharma of his time is even remotely comparable to now), or "spiritual aryan" nonsense.
It's not about riding a tiger and not a survival manual for the aristocrats of the soul, it's a bunch of commentaries about some philosophers, avoid it unless you like this kind of stuff
>>24834615Why not think for yourself?
