>show someone a piece of poetry>they immediately demand you alter it to meet their needs>refuse>well, don't ask me to read anything if you can't take the criticismI get it, put it out there, you inevitably get shit on, but why is this so common for poetry in particular? No one does it for the short stories I show them, or the essays.Do people do this in art galleries as well? "Oh, that one's shit, he should have held his brush at seventy degrees instead"
>>24837860your poems are shit
>>24837878prove it
>>24837860you should clarify that you are fishing for compliments and not looking for criticism beforehand
>>24837891And if I just want them to read it? Are those the only possible responses?
>>24837891Kek, OP defiled and debased
>>24837885most poems are shit, so the burden of proof is on you to prove it's not shit
>>24837902Oh, I thought you had read the poems. So you really don't know? Huh.
OP, are you making this up? Let's see the poem at least. Maybe try fiction if you like inventing conflict.
>>24837924nah, thanks. I have far too much love for my poetry to expose it to you fellas. no, this thread is to describe a common scenario, and to discuss why every finished piece of poetry gets treated like "happy edit time" by anyone who reads it. i mean these people treat it like it's their fuckin job to tear it down rather than read it, or give it any chance as a finished work. no other type of shared art gets treated this way automatically.
who sits down to read their copy of shakespeare's sonnets and thinks to themselves "time to rip him a new one" with red pen in tow?
Things I left on your paper:one of the craziest episodes that ever overtook me.Do you like espionage? A watered charm?My pod cast aside, I’ll walk in the human street,protect the old jib from new miniseries.I could swear it movedin incomplete back yardsto endorse the conversation, request to be strapped in.Then it will be time to take the stepgiving fragile responses,and finally he wrote the day.It happened in the waterso that was nice.It comes ready conflated:vanilla for get lost, flavor of the timeof his sponsor’s destiny. Be on that sofa.I was crossing the state line as they were reburying the stuff.You break the time lock, the bride’s canister...but we did say that we’d be back.
>>24837946Literally unreadable. No wonder you get laughed at, OP
>>24837935You sound like a huge faggot and I regret posting in this thread.
>>24837970great men are rarely liked.
>>24837970>Writes poetry>Thought he wasn't a faggot from the startAnon, I...
>tfw I wrote every post ITT except two
>>24837885Your poems be shitMy poems be litAdvice I giveListen to itYou could be greatLike me, you hateJust heed my wordsIs all it takes You understandI want to helpYou cannot standWithout some helpYour verse is crudeYour verbiage weakYour flow is wackPlease take a seatProfessor timeIt’s lesson timeI teach, you writeNow for some timeIn time you’ll beBetter than meFor now you trainWith the MC
>>24837860>why is this so common for poetry in particular?Your poems are shit, like basically all poetry. Poetry is gay, that's why the only people writing it are women and blacks. It's dead, you need to accept that and move on, or learn an instrument.
>>24837893>i want you to read my poem>do i get anything out of it>there is a chance you might like itanon poetry is a joke for a reason
>>24838027this. nobody reads poetry anymore.
>>24837860I accept that my writing is shit, and can even see the validity of specific criticisms, but altering it too much feels like it cheapens the expression. Is that pride, or something true? Idk.
>>24837860It's too much effort to fix short stories or essays, poetry is easy as it's all meaningless.
>>24837860This is not your personal blog. Either show us your poem or stop clogging up the board.
>>24838058fina-fuckin-lee. exactly my point. a poem is personal as all get-out, and certain criticisms are absolutely warranted, but at some point it feels as though they just want to break it down for the sake of breaking it down, that because they *can* criticize it, they *must* criticize it.
>>24838077I did already, dumbass
>>24838081>a poem is personal as all get-outNo more so than any other form of writing. What a weird belief to cling to.
>>24838089>academic physics papers are as personal as poetryWhat a weird belief to cling to.
>>24838081>>24838089All expressive writing is personal regardless of the style or form. I agree with you, OP, that criticism itself isn't bad, but there is something suspect at times in people's insistence upon critique before they engage in anything like appreciation. If you've ever attended a CW workshop, most people's writing sucks ass, but the point is to try to understand what they're saying first. Its a good environment to spot those who are compassionate, and those who are self absorbed. In an artistic sense if nothing else
>>24838141all it has done is made me a jealous writer, too timid to share anything i've poured myself into lest the beasts trample it down. i know i won't grow this way, i know i've destroyed my best years, but it's probably just a sign that i'm not cut out for this shit.
>>24838148Nah. That's just cynicism from being around too many small people. Which, you always inevitably will be. But there are always people who aren't like that, too. Whether you share or not is your prerogative, but dont let people who just want to hear themselves talk about how smart and erudite they are, using critique as the vehicle, let you feel like you shouldn't write. Just smile and say, thanks. Lol
>>24838155I appreciate your words of advice, anon.
>>24838091>academic physics papers are as personal as poetryYes. A good academic physics paper reveals a true insight about the world. A good poem reveals a true insight about the world. In both cases, the author has expended a good deal of effort coming to that insight. Why should one be less personal than the other?
>>24838229all right, legal copywrite drafting then.
>>24838235*copyright
so passionate, so personal
I can't believe the author was willing to publish something like this, it really shows who and what they are, deep within. It's amazing, I wish I could unleash myself in this way.
Come back, O craven one! Take your concession like a man!
may as well have cracked open the man's diary. holy shit that's raw stuff.
OP, your concessions are all mine.
>>24838235Fair enough. Not all collections of words have personal meaning to the person who wrote them, even if they fulfil the purpose for which they were written. However, good poems are not particularly more personal than other good pieces of writing that might broadly be classed as "intellectual endeavours", such as novels, essays or research papers.And I suppose the complaint about not wanting to alter it too much made by >>24838058 could just as well apply to a novel, essay or research paper, but I suspect that many people view poems as more personal than other forms of writing due to the influence of confessional poetry. Why are confessional novels or essays much less influential? My guess is that, while the confessional style is barely tolerable in small, poem-sized doses, it would become completely unbearable in longer formats.
Poetry is really hard to write and it's very easy to make someone that's absolute garbage and embarassing to read. You basically have to be really good for someone to take you even halfway serious, it's not like with panting where you can be average and people will look and say "well, that's a nice painting". It's either great, or total garbage.
>>24837860>but why is this so common for poetry in particular? No one does it for the short stories I show them, or the essays.I don't think it's common at all. Maybe your poetry is just worse than your prose. I personally find errors in prose more readily than errors in poetry because poetry can be a lot more fluid in its structure.
>>24838942>it's not like with panting where you can be average and people will look and say "well, that's a nice painting". It's either great, or total garbage.Funny, I feel it's the exact opposite, that poetry has a lower barrier to entry than painting.
>>24838988With visual arts, if you follow some basic guides you can paint some nice looking landscapes. Even if your technique is technically shit and the art isn't all that interesting, the average person will look at it and say "well, that looks nice"I guess its technically easier to go and write bad poetry, all you have to do is take a bunch of words and put them on a meter. Or worse, if you can't even do that, you can do free verse. But it's really difficult to do that and have someone read it and say "that's some nice poetry", unless you're actually a good poet.
>>24837946Dropped after the second line
>>24838091>faggy poet is a disingenuous faggotColor me shocked!
>>24838013Better than OP could ever hope to be
>>24837907Prove it's not shit, asshole. Post some of your poems.>inb4 noYeah, they're so shit, you don't want to post them.
>>24838013>white people rappingCringe
