Austrian school, liberal economics, and socialist economics are all totally unconvincing these days which proves they are not relevant to today.Rory Sutherland's takes and solutions immediately come across as reasonable and he has the market credentials to back it all up.What books do I need to read to think like him?>Inheritocracy: It’s Time to Talk About the Bank of Mum and Dad - Eliza Filby>Confessions of an advertiisng man - David OgilvyHe has mentioned, besides the historical classics (von Mises, Adam Smith, etc.) one needs to have read to throw into the trash.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnHkNyPyUTA
>>24839069The Land Trap - Mike BirdThe Fable of the Bees - Bernard MandevilleBottlenecks - Joseph FishkinProgress and Poverty - Henry GeorgeUnreasonable Hospitality - Will GuidaraThe Divided Brain and the Search for Meaning: Why We Are So Unhappy - Iain McGilchristJust from watching two podcasts today. Too much New York Times top books slop desu.
Essay on the nature of trade in general History of central banning and the enslavement of mankindMein Kampf
>>24839069i hate this toad of commerce
>>24839069ask him about replacement/displacement immigration
>>24839069~1 hour in>I'm pro immigration>emphatically not on the flag shagging side of politics
>>24839640he also said immigration is definitely affecting economic strife especially in housing and shouldnt be lied about, you lying long nose.
>>24839648He only cares about the scale and its effect on supply and demand
>>24839665indeed, he is not a racial purist chud like you
>>24839671>chudYou were a bunkertard?
>>24839678>bunkertardis this the lefty pol hideout?No, I said in the OP that shit is equally retarded.
Just watch the Nudgestock catalogue. The whole point is to use psychological trickery to make you accept everything getting worse
>>24839069>approx 1 hour 30Talking of how people shouldn't have anonymity.
>>24839739>Just watch the Nudgestock catalogue.you clearly didnt.>>24839762>>approx 1 hour 30considering you have watched almost 2 hours of him and you only have found two weak maliciously interpreted criticism of him, it seems he is quite convincing to you as well :)
>>24839717It was the precursor to that shithole or competitor I think got shut down, don't really remember, but it's where "chud" came from, so everytime I see it I just think the user is some fat bloated commietard trannie
>>24839770>you only have found two weak maliciously interpreted criticism of himNo, I never said anything like that this wasn't criticism I just think they're worth diving into further.
>>24839069>Mentions fordismAh, so he's in favour of hitler
>>24839809who doesnt like fordism?
>>24839978The Dodge Brothers, probably.
b
>>24839069I used to watch this guy on Spectator TV a few years ago, I never thought in a million years he would become a big name like he is now, especially amongst gen Z.
>>24840885all thanks to tiktok mainly
