/lit/ - Do you ever quote philosophers with whom you've on - Literature

Anonymous

10/31/25(Fri)12:16:40 No.24844224

File: 1744045670771706.png (110 KB, 437x438)

110 KB PNG

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:16:40 No.24844224 Archived

Do you ever quote philosophers with whom you've only interacted through secondary literature? Should it be allowed?

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:30:55 No.24844266

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:30:55 No.24844266

Sometimes I namedrop philosophers that don't exist to see if people play along. Gelbowitz has a really interesting book on this. I don't think this holds up after Händelberg's critiques. This has been thoroughly rebutted by Koldevic.

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:42:17 No.24844310

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:42:17 No.24844310

Anon... tiktoks does not count as secondary literature.

It´s actually more based to discover philosophy orally like the Greeks.

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:43:06 No.24844313

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:43:06 No.24844313

>>24844224
Basically the board

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:44:42 No.24844317

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:44:42 No.24844317

>>24844310
>likes audiobooks
based retard

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:45:01 No.24844319

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:45:01 No.24844319

>>24844310
Where does wikipedia and lectures fall into this

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:50:52 No.24844343

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:50:52 No.24844343

>>24844224
Why did this meme become popular. Ive read all of Nietszches books. They're not even hard to read.
Is this what normals consider humorous? Self reporting that theyre stupid dilettantes, then projecting?

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:58:02 No.24844381

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:58:02 No.24844381

>>24844343
Based pseud

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:59:49 No.24844389

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:59:49 No.24844389

File: IMG_9025.jpg (91 KB, 1080x1113)

91 KB JPG

>>24844224
I prefer this version

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)12:59:51 No.24844390

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)12:59:51 No.24844390

>>24844343
>I don't understand this. Everybody else is retarded.
Honestly, based.

Anonymous
10/31/25(Fri)13:17:08 No.24844460

Anonymous 10/31/25(Fri)13:17:08 No.24844460

>>24844390
Is that not the meme?
Assuming no one reads Nietzsche, because they themselves havent?