[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1641360417747.jpg (62 KB, 600x688)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
In my opinion, villians almost always make poor protagonists... they're just one dimensionally evil and have no morality or struggles. How can you make a protagonist exciting and interesting if they are just boring like villians?
>>
>>24850414
haha OP I love froggo XD
>>
>>24850414
Have you considered that villains might be the heroes of their own stories? It's even possible to twist virtue or law to self-serving and evil ends. And some might even say it's necessary to get ahead.
>>
>>24850414
I'm not sure why you thought this dull question would work better as a new thread than a reply on /wg/. I already shared the meme tier list
>>
>>24850414
Read Richard Stark’s Parker series. Protagonist is a sociopathic career criminal. He doesn’t target innocents, not out of a sense of morality, but simply because there’s no profit in it, but if an innocent gets between him and his goal he has zero qualms killing them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.