>>24851174
I remember Alex Jones was where I first heard of this, but in 2010.
It was like "the elites admit it all but then at the last second got coy but Quigley at least tells us this."
Then no other details at all about what it is.
Then I read it's all about power and how it works and some sort of review of the post-war post-Nuremburg transition.

If it's genuinely revelatory there would be more 'there' there. It sounds long and boring.
Glad I never bothered to touch it.

It think it's just about mind-numbing details of how and through which offices the early 1950s version of the post-war order was constructed.
If you're an absolute dunce it might be revelatory to learn our entire society and global society itself are centrally planned to a degree that is not taught in schools. But, if you are halfway familiar with elite theory, geopolitics, or even basic history with any depth, or have ever read any revision, I think this book's a waste of time.

Poorly written, outdated, and boring history of the 20th century, with one interesting claim about a clandestine globalist group that directed Atlanticist foreign policy, the veracity of which supposed attendees dispute. You can read this claim in an archived copy of the book online, and read far better history elsewhere.

>>24851886
Astonishingly consistent with my intuition above.

>>24851886
>the veracity of which supposed attendees dispute.
Well if you say so… sure don’t want to lift the stage-curtain up after all, that would be bad for imperial power politics.

>>24851174
An S tier history book. I recommend listening to this audiobook while you read
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLu5tKfQq0iybY2hiWze543ew_zqVo8il0&si=uCT_OJH4WrvKZJaN